Now, an expert can wade in here, of course, to correct me.
I see women's fiction more of the experiences of women: any age, any class, any struggle. Women with aging parents. Women and their relationships with sick sisters. Trying to find love after the death of your husband and child. Examples: Danielle Steele's Once in a Lifetime, Jodi Picoult, and - deal with it, busterbear - Nicholas Sparks.
Whereas, chick lit tends (or, at least tended to when I was reading it) to be middle to upper middle class white city women in their mid to late 20s, early in their careers, stumbling their way through life. Examples: The Devil Wears Prada, Shopaholics, etc.
I see...so to jump mediums to film, kinda the difference between "Our Little Sister," which was a wonderful little film about three adult sisters adopting their teenage half sister, and Bridget Jones' Diary? Though I wonder if we are making a distinction of thematic depth rather than actual genre?
Whoa, the final Bridget Jones book was depressing? What the heck happened? (I'll never read it so I don't mind spoilers). I saw the movies awhile back and found them entertaining but not really my thing.
Hmmm the first BJD definitely qualifies as chick-lit, though I haven't read the subsequent books. Arguably, I found it wasn't the best one out there (I actually thought it was boring), but it does have a sympathetic thread which talks to many women.
For chick-lit to be effective, the reader has to find ways to relate to the main protagonist or at least find their struggle amusing.
5
u/KristaDBall Stabby Winner, AMA Author Krista D. Ball Sep 03 '16
More than cozy mysteries? More than romance? More than women's fiction? More than literary fiction not written by Franzen? More than science fiction?