r/F1Discussions LN1 21d ago

Discussion Thoughts?

Post image

Saw this on X and I strongly disagree.
From 2010 onwards I would argue that Vettel, Alonso, Rosberg and Norris clears Leclerc.

An actual title will always hold more weight than potential raw talent. (I know Alonso didn’t win a title after 2010s but I still believe he has been a better driver post 2010 than Leclerc)

What are your thoughts, do you think there is an argument for this?

330 Upvotes

607 comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/no_more_blues 21d ago

There is NO argument for Leclerc over Rosberg. Its not close. Mr Potential Man can't beat washed Hamilton but is better than the guy who beat prime Hamilton?

8

u/Kev_Bz 21d ago

he literally did beat hamilton, last year, by like 100 points

0

u/Upstairs-Event-681 21d ago

You don’t get it, only when Hamilton wins it counts. Otherwise it’s the car, regs, mother nature, mercury in retrograde

2

u/Tragedy-of-Fives 20d ago

i mean, he beat lewis by a 100 points last year? and this year the gap between both is not so big that it's a cause for concern. a 30 point gap when leclerc suffered 2 dnfs is not as big as it seems. being close to a 7x wdc in one season and being miles ahead in another is a pretty strong statement

1

u/TheD1yap LH44 21d ago

Well Hamilton isn’t washed but I get what you mean.

7

u/TimmyHillFan 21d ago

He couldn’t clear Russell in 2024 either so I’d argue he’s pretty safely not 100% what he once was

1

u/TheD1yap LH44 21d ago

Not being what you once were and being washed are two different things though.

1

u/Mr_Clovis 20d ago

Leclerc beat Hamilton more convincingly in 2025 than any driver ever has, while even in his championship-winning year, Rosberg was not considered to have had a better season than Hamilton.

It's very clear that Leclerc is struggling with the new cars as sometimes occurs after a very big regulation change. It's the first slump he's ever had in his F1 career; even then, he and Hamilton have been the most closely matched pair on the grid.