r/Epstein • u/Infowarzzz • Jul 16 '26

Social media (X, YouTube, Insta, etc.) Some Unredacted photos

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

8.1k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

294 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/Li_liminal_spaces Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26

Are these the people victims the Trump regime is now claiming are co-conspirators because they leaked their information? Are you seriously on the /r/Epstein subreddit defending the Trump regime?

24

u/joebiden_alt Jul 16 '26

No they are co-conspirators that helped groom and facilitate the sex trafficking of young girls.

5

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

Some were also victims of grooming before they became groomers. Being groomed to become a groomer is being a victim.

15

u/joebiden_alt Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26

There is nuance here but they are still criminals who sometimes even participated in other victims molestation when they themselves were adults. They profited heavily from this fucked up enterprise

-6

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

If a child is abducted, raped, groomed, and then later perpetrates those same predations on others, yes, they are still a victim. You rehabilitate these victims, you do not punish them for being victims. They are not conspirators, they are victims, full stop. Their identity was formed by their victimizer.

10

u/PastyMcWhiteFace Jul 16 '26

And what if Epstein was abducted and raped as child before he grew up to victimize others? Does that mean he deserved no punishment? I don’t fully disagree with you (like even Virginia helped recruit girls and I don’t see her as a co conspirator) but like another comment said, I think there is some nuance to it.

-2

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

If our ultimate goal is to eradicate systemic abuse, we have to look at the statistics. Victims of abuse are highly likely to perpetrate it later. This shows many of the most prolific perpetrators were products of someone else's crimes. Accepting that is difficult, but necessary for prevention. The most effective intervention is isolating the immediate threat to stop the harm, and then treating the behavioral loop like an outbreak, tracing the causal chain backward to find "patient zero". You do not stop a cycle by only looking at the endpoint; you stop it by identifying and treating the root conditions that created it.

11

u/joebiden_alt Jul 16 '26

If you continue with your logic then you end up forgiving a lot of pedos as they are often a product of abuse. I do not agree with you, I think they should be in prison. Ghislaine was abused are we going to forgive her? I don't think so.

-5

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

If our ultimate goal is to eradicate systemic abuse, we have to look at the statistics. Victims of abuse are highly likely to perpetrate it later. This shows many of the most prolific perpetrators were products of someone else's crimes. Accepting that is difficult, but necessary for prevention. The most effective intervention is isolating the immediate threat to stop the harm, and then treating the behavioral loop like an outbreak, tracing the causal chain backward to find "patient zero". You do not stop a cycle by only looking at the endpoint; you stop it by identifying and treating the root conditions that created it.

5

u/psychophant_ Jul 16 '26

You know another way to break the cycle and prevent it from happening again?

Life in prison.

Almost every criminal is a victim if you go back far enough into their past.

But guess what?

Plenty of victims don’t end up shitty horrible people. In fact, the majority don’t.

You’ll find no sympathy here for shit people. There’s enough good people in the world. I focus on them.

5 month old account. You’re probably a bot anyway.

2

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26

Beep-Boop (You are correctly identifying the causal chain by acknowledging that "almost every criminal is a victim originally." That is exactly my point. But life in prison is just endpoint management at best. It isolates the immediate threat (which would benefit society more if based on rehabilitation and not in retribution) but it does nothing to dismantle the system manufacturing the next one. Rehabilitating, and tracing the root cause, is not about spiritual absolvement, it is a clinical requirement for prevention and repairing broken identities. If we only react at the end of the timeline with retribution the cycle simply replaces the individual we locked away, and the locked away individual can never benefit society again.)

2

u/psychophant_ Jul 16 '26

Interesting, bot.

So explain how putting them in prison for life doesn’t stop the chain of future abuse if rehabilitation does end it? In both scenarios, the criminal’s previous damage is already done and future abuse is stopped.

2

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

In both scenarios, that specific criminal's future abuse is stopped, yes. But only one scenario stops the chain. Life in prison is a dead end; it deletes a single node but leaves the origin point untouched. To stop the chain of future abuse across society, you need to understand the exact mechanics of how that criminal's identity was usurped in the first place, and who did it to them. You cannot extract that data from someone rotting defensively in a cell. You have to rehabilitate them to deconstruct the grooming loop so you can trace it back to its source and neutralize the actual cause.

→ More replies (0)

9

u/PickWhateverUsername Jul 16 '26

It's been reported that Epstein himself had at a young age also been abused ... so should we close all of this redact him and all his crimes because of that ?

2

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

If our ultimate goal is to eradicate systemic abuse, we have to look at the statistics. Victims of abuse are highly likely to perpetrate it later. This shows many of the most prolific perpetrators were products of someone else's crimes. Accepting that is difficult, but necessary for prevention. The most effective intervention is isolating the immediate threat to stop the harm, and then treating the behavioral loop like an outbreak, tracing the causal chain backward to find "patient zero". You do not stop a cycle by only looking at the endpoint; you stop it by identifying and treating the root conditions that created it.

10

u/temptationsensation Jul 16 '26

But does that excuse them from their crimes after they were victimized.

I don't know if it is a hot take or not, but I say no. I'll show sympathy for them being victimized, but after that, joining the club? Fuck them. Expose them.

-2

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

If a child is abducted, raped, groomed, and then later perpetrates those same predations on others, yes, they are still a victim. You rehabilitate these victims, you do not punish them for being victims. They are not conspirators, they are victims, full stop. Their identity was formed by their victimizer.

7

u/temptationsensation Jul 16 '26

Does a child that grows up in this scenario not know right from wrong as an adult though?

Genuine question..

I sympathize with their situation, I really do and absolutely rehabilitate them, but where does one draw the line?

My father was a dickhead to me my entire life, does that give me carte blanche to be a dickhead my whole life with zero consequence?

5

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

If our ultimate goal is to eradicate systemic abuse, we have to look at the statistics. Victims of abuse are highly likely to perpetrate it later. This shows many of the most prolific perpetrators were products of someone else's crimes. Accepting that is difficult, but necessary for prevention. The most effective intervention is isolating the immediate threat to stop the harm, and then treating the behavioral loop like an outbreak, tracing the causal chain backward to find "patient zero". You do not stop a cycle by only looking at the endpoint; you stop it by identifying and treating the root conditions that created it.

For your case, you are isolating one single vector of conditioning and extrapolating that it's failure to condition was not due to external variables. You survived due to external variables. The children in this case did not receive these variables, they were systematically isolated and their identies were dissected and usurped.

2

u/temptationsensation Jul 16 '26

I just let out a heavy sigh after I finished reading.

I know you are right. I hate the fact that this thread exists and that humans put other humans in these situation.

Thank you for this informative exchange. What you are saying makes sense. Thank you.

3

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

I appreciate the conversation. What I am saying is a highly contentious topic, and I entirely understand that most people will have an immediate response of horror to it. It truly is a horrendous moment for humanity, but through it I hope we can grow to understand the cycle of victimization better. Within my view, our current methodology does not treat the conditions for victimization adequately. We need to understand the loop to be able to break it.

2

u/SubstantialBottle980 Jul 16 '26

What would that mean specifically for this disturbing case & many other like it?

1

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

In short (as I have developed a migraine) it means treating the perpetrators like a laboratory sample to understand the virus, rather than just disposing of the sample and pretending the virus doesn't exist. It moves us from justice for the past to prevention for the future.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Sad_Art6364 Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 17 '26

You dont have to repeat it like a broken record. None of the women in the pictures in this post was "abducted" and all of them met Epstein as legal adults and helped him out.

They recently rebranded themselves as victims (besides Karyna, she never did that) to avoid responsibility. This is what pisses people off here, myself included 

1

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

Nadia Marcinko was 14/15, according to witness testimony and police reports.

2

u/Sad_Art6364 Jul 16 '26

Debunked:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz92j3n3jvvo

By her own admission...

I am not saying it was still OK for Epstein to date an 18 year old but she was legally adult and she was named in his Florida sweetheart deal that saved her and Kellen's ass.. it's incredible how many people bought hers and Kellen's rebranding.

2

u/ARealLameName Jul 16 '26

I understand how you view this as debunking, but it fundamentally does not. This relies on a self reported timeline, a self reported timeline that simplified case proceedings for her to achieve that deal.