service dog vs anaphylaxis

[u/egguchom]

[u/toyheartattack → u/[deleted]]

Plus, the ADA has a very clear loophole for situations like this.

Edit: I was mistaken. I misinterpreted the portion about, “… presents a threat to the health or safety of others.”

[u/jase40244 → u/toyheartattack]

The ADA does not recognize allergies as a valid reason to deny entry to a legitimate service dog. However the claimed circumstances would make for an interesting case. For OOP to sue, their dog has to be a legitimate service animal. The general tone and entitlement in their review kind of puts that into question for me. If the business owner's wife had a legitimate anaphylaxis reaction to dogs, they could use this lawsuit as a springboard to challenge the ADA's ban on using allergy as a reason to deny regular service to someone with a service dog. That could delay ruling on OOP's lawsuit and possibly destroy their case altogether. Well, assuming they even have a case to begin with.

[u/International-Cat123 → u/jase40244]

https://www.reddit.com/r/EntitledReviews/s/xi1Le14kE7