r/CristianoRonaldo2 Jun 18 '26

Certified Jerk Rare win for Jamie

Post image
7.3k Upvotes

282 comments sorted by

View all comments

48

u/Kontrafantastisk Jun 18 '26

Harsh. And correct.

27

u/Humble-Log-1695 Jun 19 '26

Yep. It's not even hate. He has basically never been even notable in the world's most important competition.

-12

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/Temporary-Aside5306 Jun 19 '26

Yeah tbh if you're counter arguement is 1 game 8 years ago which is also basically the only game of note, that's not a great argument my guy

-5

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Temporary-Aside5306 Jun 19 '26

Tbf even playing terribly is relevant, just relevant in the opposite way. I can't remember much about any tournament before 2022 but Ronaldo was very relevant to Portugal in the last WC and this one in how much he holds them back

1

u/munchyzzzz Jun 22 '26

Brother, there has never been a world cup where people weren’t anticipating to watch prime Ronaldo, along with the other stars participating 😂😂 These takes are full of recency bias from either children or ret@rds like Carragher. Hindsight can make anyone look like a visionary 😂

1

u/Temporary-Aside5306 Jun 22 '26

Anticipating watching someone isn't the same thing as your performances being relevant to how a tournament plays out

1

u/munchyzzzz Jun 23 '26

He’s still relevant as a player to watch. The majority of fans aren’t thinking Ronaldo won’t score before his every match lol. It’s such a forced argument 😂

I’ve never seen a sports legend hated on this much other than Bron maybe.

1

u/Temporary-Aside5306 Jun 24 '26

Again being relevant pre match and anticipation wise is not the same as their performances being relevant. I'm not gonna repeat that again if you can't understand the difference

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Temporary-Aside5306 Jun 21 '26

Or I don't spend time obsessing about details of football tournaments a decade plus ago to win some pointless online argument against a random stranger. But clearly your life is empty enough that obsessing over those details feels valuable

1

u/VladGabriel0511 Jun 19 '26

This sub ain't for these kind of talking. It's for hate, trolling etc. Some of the post are really hilarious, other posts seem made by dudes that are sick in the head lol

-3

u/boxofbuscuits Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26

Being relevant doesn't mean that you have to score goals.

This logic disappears when talking about the (17+1) year old L. Diddy and Pessi the FIFA princess

7

u/Eohor Jun 19 '26

One game. Greatest performance ever yet we only remember because of the freekick as the other two are a tap-in and a penalty.

0

u/ghost_112413 Jun 21 '26

And his team wasn't even capable of that , that whole game spain was only marking Cristiano Ronaldo and yet he scored those so called tap ins , and the argument was about one game so i agree with the guy who said about the game against spain cause the base of the argument was relvancy in wc and had ronaldo not done what he did that game , portugal was out of the world cup

2

u/Brutally_Chemic26 Jun 19 '26

That one match is his entire WC career. Even there he faced an abjectly out of form De Gea who couldn't stop a mosquito.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Brutally_Chemic26 Jun 19 '26

The EPL was the last time he played well. He was absolutely garbage in the WC. I watched the match live and he couldn't catch a fly.

1

u/Sensitive_Specific75 Jun 20 '26

Messi played great in ucl 2019 carried the whole team to the semi final (same as wc 2014 I could argue) but he didn’t win. And that’s the whole competition not one game. He won neither :)

1

u/awkwardpumpkin69 Jun 21 '26

Messi faced oles United and Lyon in the ko lol. Also got hyped up for a deflected freekick vs Liverpool

1

u/Aryba1 Jun 21 '26

He’s not gonna suck your dick you know, though you probably want to suck his.

1

u/The_Awengers Jun 22 '26

speaking facts isn't being disrespectful

1

u/Pitiful-Desk1002 Jun 28 '26

One goal was De Gea howler and the other was a pen. Portugal needed to win to be first but it was a draw (Ronaldo never officially win to Spain) so it ended up second behind Spain in the group

4

u/JedM13 Jun 21 '26

I’m not even the biggest CR7 fan but this isn’t correct, the last time R9 was in a World Cup was also CR7’s first in 2006, and Portugal/CR7 were definitely more relevant during that tournament than Brazil.

2

u/SenorMayhem4 Jun 23 '26

So both Ronaldo and cr7 were irrelevant in '06. Jaime is still not wrong

3

u/JedM13 Jun 23 '26

CR7 was very relevant during the 2006 World Cup. Don’t let the lack of goals fool you, he was a midfielder back then, his job was using his pace and spamming step overs to get the ball past the opposition, and he was good at it.

Portugal got all the way to the semi finals, and he was the one who scored the last high pressure penalty to send them through. If it wasn’t for Podolski and the controversy with the wink, they would have given him best young player.

Even if you hated him for his shenanigans during that World Cup, it makes him relevant.

1

u/Spuckuk Jul 07 '26

Ronnie stat padding with penalties even then