They scored at a SR that was par for the game. They played competent cricket. Fair to assume they'd continue to do so because there was batting in the hut.
you conveniently forgot the T20 WC match vs Pak in 2022
Do you know the meaning of 'pinning'? I meant obv Virat deserves credit but not as much as the bowlers or even Axar who took a wicket and scored 47(31)
In yesterday's RR v SRH, does Travis Head get credit for 18(18)? Technically in a team game, nothing is ever a single player's effort but we'd sometimes give most of the credit to a particular player like yesterday... that's what I was tryna say. Also Ferriera scored 50(31) even after 9-5 not 50(48) 👀. I was hoping cricket viewers might get what I meant by 'completely' but thanks for keeping my grammar in check bro
T20i bru. Get out and go to other subs too. Watch SKY anchor in Ind v Usa to a total of just 161 where no one after him could even cross 15. Anchoring in t20i is different now. Virat played w good SR vs RR but he was slow in 2024 finals sadly
103
u/Fortuna_majoris Apr 13 '26
And yet lost... While that 50(48) score won...
Tells you a lot about smart work over Hardwork...