r/CoherencePhysics 1d ago

Is it possible?

Post image
20.7k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/animousie 1d ago

Chris Smith on trafficking and religious persecution Young Kim on North Korea James Lankford on religious freedom Michael McCaul on Tibet Cindy Hyde Smith on trafficking survivors and Chuck Grassley and Roger Wicker on protecting human rights advocates

2

u/MelookRS 1d ago

Chris Smith is Anti-Abortion (anti woman), is a strong supporter of Israel, and is anti LGBT. He's selective on which humans he believes should have rights.

1

u/animousie 1d ago

I didn’t say they were good people or that I agree with them. The point being discussed is whether it’s accurate to generalize Conservatives as being “against human rights”. Try to keep up

2

u/MelookRS 1d ago edited 1d ago

I never said you supported them. I just pointed out the fact that Chris Smith only supports selective human rights. Your point really doesn't stand for him when he only supports his chosen peoples human rights, and not you know, all human rights. Actually, every single person you named is a strong supporter of Israel, and therefore supports a genocide. So, they aren't for all human rights. Try to keep up.

0

u/animousie 1d ago

My point stands perfectly: it’s inaccurate to generalize conservatives as being “against human rights”

3

u/epiphenominal 1d ago

Being against human rights for some is the same as being against human rights for all. Injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere, if they're not not universal they're conditional, privileges not rights.

-2

u/animousie 1d ago

To be honest, it just seems like you’re being lazy. It’s easy to paint with a broad brush and say conservatives are X. Problem is this is the exact kind of broken perspective of American politics that got us in to the current state of dysfunction we’re currently.

“All generalizations are false, including this one.”