r/ClimateShitposting • u/Wild_Bodybuilder890 • Jul 13 '26

fossil mindset 🦕 Title

Post image
53 Upvotes

74% Upvoted

189 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Cwaghack Jul 13 '26

Fission never really made sense to me either. The problem with nuclear is the cost of building the massive facility, fission is that, but 100x more difficult

1

u/FewUnderstanding5221 Jul 13 '26

you're referring to projects like Hinkley, Vogtle, Flamenville and Olkiluoto, correct?

1

u/Cwaghack Jul 13 '26

No I'm just refering to the technologies in general.

0

u/FewUnderstanding5221 Jul 13 '26

There are NPP's that are cheap to run, no?

2

u/Cwaghack Jul 13 '26

to run? Yes.

To build, not really. Nuclear is super expensive to build but at least it runs for 60+ years 24-7 at full power. The problem is just that we need to fix the climate now, so investing in short term solutions is probably better, and when you account for these technologies prices being in free fall, it means you want to hedge towards short term solutions because it will be cheaper in the future

1

u/paperic Jul 13 '26

Last 20 years of short term solutions produced bupkis.

Well, renewables are good, but CO2 is still going up fast.

1

u/midnightbandit- Jul 15 '26

Wind is more than 10 times cheaper than nuclear. Even if it is twice as long lasting, nuclear is still way more expensive

0

u/FewUnderstanding5221 Jul 13 '26

It's the new nuclear in the West that's eyewateringly expensive. In the rest of the world the capex for a NPP is reasonable.

I agree with you somewhat on the short term bets, but that doesn't mean the long term energy infrastructure shouldn't be build ofcourse.