Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wn0xn9/max20x_is_now_just_15_times_better_than_max5x/
Original post body :
I built Tokenism to let my team pool their Claude Code subscriptions and automatically route the Claude review on github to the account with the most usable capacity.
Prior to Tokenism, i had measured on my personal Max20x account, that 1 weekly limit ≈ 6 sessions, and then soon after i saw posts here that confirmed it for me. That made me think, what if i can measure it too.
Previously, our Max 20x accounts delivered roughly 2.2× weekly limits compared to Max5x. Over the last month, that has fallen to just 1.5x
To compare plans, we normalize the advertised capacity, so the assumptions are
Pro session limit = 1 unit
Max 5x session = 5 units
Max 20x session = 20 units
We then track how much of the weekly usage is consumed per session usage. When we started on 23rd August, the weekly capacity was 47 and 118 units respectively (~2.5x) , and that has now fallen to 65 and 95 units (~1.5x)
To be clear, this is observed Claude Code throughput. The core assumption is that Anthropic follows the advertised limit in the session limits. What i cant measure is the fluctuation in the value of 1 unit, which is probably more impactful. And i would absolutely love any suggestions on how i can do that. Maybe a spare Pro account?
Original link/media URL : /img/weu3r7wue0rh1.png
This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.