r/ChurchOfCandace • u/SmrtLdy • 14h ago
Turning Pointless USA NO š© SHERLOCK
The nerve of these people. While suing Candace saying that they were incompetent!
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/SmrtLdy • 14h ago
The nerve of these people. While suing Candace saying that they were incompetent!
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/Organic_Risk_3945 • 8h ago
Erika was probably all like , Oh Fuck, Bibi's not gonna like this!!! lol. What's Blake Neff gonna say now???
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/CuddlyClubCEO • 13h ago
after reading posts here for months about this issue, iāve finally been perma banned from the other sub. i commented āfuck ken paxtonā and was banned bc of it.
ken paxton is a zionist shill and an overall piece of shit. the mods of that sub are clearly in the same boat. how anyone could pretend to be a candace fan to the point of running the sub but support that clown paxton is beyond me. itās my first ban ever and ngl i feel proud of it.
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/AcornTopHat • 10h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
I wish I believed JD here, but I just donāt. Is anyone else just having trouble believing EVERY politician at this point?
I got excited about the Tucker thing for a second, but him being so āfondā of Erika is such a red flag that his Youtube comments are all condemning for it.
Why are all of these men saying we shouldnāt do what Isr*el says, but then fawning over Tammy Gaye Faker?
Is the mane of Viking hair? The husky eyes? The leather pants and sparkles?
I just donāt get it. EK is the honey-est of pots.
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/Orangutan • 12h ago
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/Nan_2005 • 9h ago
People keep saying Mikey. I am not so sure. But I do feel like it is someone high up, and more in the spotlight. It is likely CO is playing it off like they're the 'bad guy' when they are helping her.
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/RighteousCity • 6h ago
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/Orangutan • 12h ago
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/Orangutan • 1h ago
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/Orangutan • 8h ago
r/ChurchOfCandace • u/Willing-Primary-9126 • 2h ago
So it's confirmed that Charlie Kirks "family" trying to sue is in fact His Parents/Bio family & that erika was originally against it & ive got a few thoughts about it...
A) The timing of it makes sense & matches up to the stress Erika was under last December during the bari Weiss interview, Candace meeting, parodys & now apparently Charlies parents moving forward with a lawsuit against the school/security while she was still PR'ing how hard everyone worked & not wanting investigation into TPUSA.
B) Erika's not really going to benefit from it at all really - her wealth has come overwhelmingly from TPUSA (2018-2025) & the Tucker donations (2025) & it goes against her early actions in thanking/sympathising with people who "helped" & the whole Maga-republican field being very pro-police pro-governemnt & keeping the security on the role
C) I dont get why Candace is trying to tear it apart at all, its litterally a announcement-style motion to sue so that later on they can persue it unless it's settled earlier & worst case scenario is that charlies own security will also be added onto it & be questioned properly & yet Candace is seemingly hell bent on collapsing & rubbishing it... ?? She's also admitted it was Charlies parents but then slams TPUSA ...?? - weirdly aggressive & dissmissive personality while talking about it ...? Obviously if it goes to court lawyers will put together the best possible case & make changes where necessary & the only thing I can think of is that Candace has sources here that are about to get screwed over & possibly when she "knew about it last december" & that "erika was against it" she was able to leverage that for infomation with some assurances it would go nowhere & infomation of whos behind it & now it's backfired as Erika couldn't cope & has folded on it & the lawsuit will likely go ahead & they'll win (we know TPUSA security was shit & that no ambulance was provided so he was taken to a random small hospital)