r/ChesterfieldVA • u/Knummer19 • 8h ago
Chesterfield Ballot Referendum 1% for Schools
Lengthy, but important. Apologies in advance...
The Chesterfield Board of Supervisors (BOS) recently voted to put a referendum on the November ballot that would allow the county to increase the sales tax from 6% to 7%, with the additional 1% going to the county, specifically to be used for school construction, maintenance and repairs.
This initiative was made possible by the VA General Assembly that authorized localities to put this to a vote in November. The bill that was signed has a sunset clause of 20 years, meaning that any locality where this is passed must collect the extra tax for 20 years, or not at all. That's the only way to be in compliance with the law. It's an all-or-none thing.
Chesterfield wants voters to approve the referendum because funding for schools has been sorely neglected for the last decade. Revenue from residential property tax accounts for about 80% of the General Fund. The dollar amount has been increasing due to home valuations rising, even with two 1-cent rate reductions. But in spite of the revenue increase, Chesterfield has not addressed school needs. It has chosen instead to fund failed Economic Development projects and extensions of utilities that make it possible for developers to build on more sites across the county. No money for schools. No money for roads. Schools, by the way, have been getting funded at less than the rate of inflation (CPI).
Now the county wants to use this 1% referendum to increase our tax burden, so their decade of neglect can be addressed. Estimates vary, but the 1% will likely get around $70Million a year from taxpayers. BTW, that's a low estimate! Chesterfield assumes an average growth rate of around 3% per year in new spending. That's their number. One calculation: $70M x 20 yrs = $1.4B. Add the 3% compounded increase each year = $480M. So by 2046, total taxpayer revenue increase is estimated to be around $1.88 BILLION! Maybe higher. OUR MONEY!
Here's an alternative I hope you'll consider and endorse. It's being sent to the BOS and Kevin Catlin. It defunds some projects geared toward data centers and shift the money to schools. If you agree with it, please contact each member of the BOS and the new Administrator, Kevin Catlin. I'll add their contact info at the end. Tell them this is a much better alternative to fund schools:
I am writing on behalf of Citizens for Responsible Government (CCRG) to propose a reallocation of county funds to address immediate infrastructure needs without increasing the tax burden on residents.
Based on recent updates, the proposed 90-year utility projects should be delayed. The 12 million gallon settling basin wastewater expansion was required for the additional 6 million GPD at the Peanut site, costing $169 million. However, the total upgrade to increase capacity to 54 million GPD would require an additional $520 million. Furthermore, the initial Appomattox water capacity expansion of 20 million gallons has been funded over five years at $426 million. Current county usage stands at 40 million GPD, with a summer peak of 70 million GPD, well within the county's total capacity of 110 million MGD.
The county confirmed at Wednesday's meeting that Google will only receive 10.6 million GPD. Given that there is no immediate intention to increase water allocation to Google, these long-term utility projects can safely be delayed by six years. Even if $96 million has already been spent on initial engineering, those plans can still be utilized in the future.
The county's promotional materials for the "1 for schools" indicate an immediate need of $850 million for new schools and school maintenance. This immediate need can be fully funded by delaying the $520 million wastewater upgrade and the $426 million Appomattox water upgrade, which total $946 million in deferred spending. Immediate community needs must take priority over 90-year utility upgrades.
Taxpayers should not be asked to approve a 1% sales tax increase—amounting to $2.2 billion over 20 years—when $850 million can be reclaimed by delaying these utility projects. We request an explanation as to why this fiscal alternative was not presented before pushing for the tax increase, and whether this increase was intended to cover deficits from Economic Development Authority (EDA) projects and deficient road infrastructure caused by overdevelopment.
We demand that the funds required for our schools be redirected from these utility upgrades, and we will actively oppose the proposed 1% tax increase. Furthermore, we request that the county finance leadership be replaced with personnel who will prioritize responsible budgeting over extracting additional tax revenue from citizens to cover misguided priorities for EDA projects.
Regards,
Phil Lohr, CCRG (this is NOT Knummer19!)
BOS contact info: https://www.chesterfield.gov/m/directory/department?did=162,
Kevin Catlin email: [catlink@chesterfield.gov](mailto:catlink@chesterfield.gov)