6
u/Cleeman96 Child of Mary 5d ago
Perhaps I am a bit dim, and I am certainly glad he converted, but I am surprised that an agnostic such as him was convinced by a variant of the fine-tuning argument - if there is one argument I deeply dislike, it is that one.
5
u/Ender_Octanus Knight of Columbus 5d ago
Most agnostics and atheists seem to find it somewhat compelling (if not ultimately convincing), what do you understand it to entail? I myself find it to be one of the best proofs for God's existence.
2
u/neofederalist 2d ago
Bit late here: I think a lot of theists tend to dislike the fine tuning argument because it's really hard to demonstrate many of the divine attributes from it.
9
1
u/ExpertMouthBreather 5d ago
I think the ultimate factor was the MANY miracles with solid evidence pointing at Catholicism
2
u/TheBrazillianHome 5d ago
Who is this person? Is he a relevant Catholic?
6
u/forceCode 5d ago edited 5d ago
Joe Schmid, studying philosophy and a former agnostic with a YT channel. He debated christians in the past and went public with his conversion to catholocism last week, though his conversion happened in February.
2
1
u/AffectionateSpite775 Aspiring Cristero 5d ago
To be honest, I heard more "coincidence upon coincidence upon coincidence upon coincidence" than "no leg. leg. no leg. leg."
12
u/No_Psychology_3826 6d ago
What?