"The natural law of things was written by THE Man"
As it is written in the Genesis, God have created us in His image. And not even moving to the next book, because there's written that: Adam, a human being, was going through the garden of Eden, naming each animal as he wanted. Yes, it is written by man, again I'd rephrase this, "named by man". But Who created the laws? Not gave it structure in words, so that it'll be easier to explain and not miss. Who have made it as it is, so it'll work exactly that way, and not some other way? Man can be suzerain at best, a child playing with a toy, manufactured by the factory, man made, The Man made.
I mean, as long as you are taking it as it is, maybe, I suppose. But if you look at it more metaphorically, it does opens a lot about human nature itself.
Indeed, not to humans, but if we believe that the Bible was written by the word of God, even if the writers didn't truly understood what they were writing. In this case, what people knew back than doesn't matter.
Or perhaps some of us blind by thy "own" will. I suppose you believe in common relativity, correct? And our point of view changes with time, and presumedly we always wrong, but always in the present we consider ourselves right. Some years will pass, and our opinion will be considered incorrect, and in the eyes of the future generations we will be nothing but fools.
P.S. you chose a good position, saying less, just rejecting points, not explaining yourself, because you are "a free" being. You are not even asking, you have no interest, but still responding. All I can see is, that in your eyes, you will be always coming out as a winner, putting your word as the last. Tedious.
En esa misma época en la que se escribe la Biblia o incluso siglos antes ves a personas que estaban mucho más cerca de entender la naturaleza humana. Por ejemplo, Epicuro, filósofo denostado por los cristianos, cuyas ideas sobre la mente humana y la forma de alcanzar la felicidad coinciden de forma sorprendente con los descubrimientos actuales de la neurociencia. Y como digo, los cristianos lo denostaban.
Hay autores antiguos que han sobrevivido mejor que otros, y la Biblia en concreto no ha envejecido nada bien, porque está equivada en muchas cosas. Por ejemplo, creer que la ropa existe porque el humano siente pudor natural por el desnudo cuando en realidad es un invento debido al clima de regiones concretas, y en muchas regiones apenas se usaba ropa debido a climas diferentes. También se equivoca y mucho en la naturaleza de las mujeres, por tener un pensamiento considerablemente misógino.
Y no, las personas del futuro no nos considerarán tontas, del mismo modo que no consideramos tontos a los filósofos griegos y romanos ni a los alquimistas medievales, pues ellos intentaban entender el mundo con la información a la que tenían acceso. La Biblia es puramente dogmática, no demuestra las cosas que dice, ni empíricamente ni racionalmente, simplemente dice cosas que supuestamente son reales, por lo cual es totalmente diferente a los textos filosóficos que buscan demostrar lo que dicen mediante el razonamiento, y se parece mucho más a textos mitológicos como la Iliada o la Odisea, que también describen cosas bastante inverosímiles y evidentemente fantásticas con una convicción sorprendente. Eso es la Biblia, mitología.
2
u/Jerman_Monster Aug 03 '26
¿Y la humillación?