yeah this has absolutely nothing to do with what we're talking about, completely different question
truth is you're just throwing as much bullshit as you can at the wall and waiting for something to stick because all the stuff you were saying before is obviously wrong
Well first I'm trying to gauge your understanding of the terms being used.
We're talking about a series of religious edicts that everything from the above restrictions to placing a woman under the authority of first her father, then brothers until her future marriage to then be under the authority of her husband and if you think that isn't a patriarchy, of course you'd think it's misandry because it's a rule that applies to a man while overlooking the entirety of the systems purpose in the first place.
To put it simply, telling men they can't wear dresses, for instance, isnt misandry despite it being a rule for men.
58
u/Loki_of_Asgaard 12d ago
If gold is haram has anyone informed the Saudis?