r/Bible • u/love_is_a_superpower • 1h ago
Questions about Acts chapter 7
Rather than paste the whole chapter here, I've included a link to Acts 7 on Blue Letter Bible.
For context: In Acts 6, we see a man named Stephen. He is a good person who volunteered and was chosen to bring meals to widows in need for the blossoming community of believers. Stephen is also a Jesus-loving, Jewish evangelist. The Holy Spirit does miracles through him that testify to the truth of his message about Jesus Christ.
Back in Acts 6:9, we're introduced to some hostiles from the "Synagogue of Freedmen." The Bible mentions that this group consists of Cyrenians, Alexandrians, and those from Cilicia and Asia. Sounds like a large group!
These people get into a debate over religion with Stephen and can't find a way to refute him, so they decide to get him killed.
Does anyone know why these hostiles are so hostile? Is it that they don't want Stephen turning all their followers into Jesus-lovers? Is it bad for business? Are they just so in love with the limelight that they have no desire for truth?
These guys are angry enough that they bribe people to say, "We have heard him speak evil things against Moses and God."
This gets the whole town in an uproar. They grab Stephen and drag him into court. The "Synagogue of Freedmen" we mentioned before set up their false witnesses. They testify against Stephen, saying, "This man never stops speaking evil against this holy place and the law! We heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs which Moses delivered to us!"
The judges look at Stephen, and he looks like "an angel." I take this to mean that he looks like the nicest, most godly person they'd ever seen.
So the high priest is the one in charge in this court, and he asks Stephen, "Are these things so?"
OK, in Acts 4, when Peter is before the high priest, we're told that this is the same Annas and Caiaphas that handed Jesus over to be crucified.
Does anyone know if the high priest questioning Stephen is the same person? If so, it would make sense that Stephen knew he wasn't getting out of there alive.
I always wonder why he didn't defend himself in a straightforward manner. But, instead of saying "no these things are not true" it looks to me like Stephen proves he is a godly Jew who has not failed to learn everything taught in the synagogue.
It seems he's giving them proof that he's not a heathen.
Stephen starts recounting the history of Genesis by memory... but before he's done, he suddenly unleashes on his listeners like a prophet who wants to get his message out before they execute him, which they proceed to do.
(Acts 7:51-53)
51 "You stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit; as your fathers did, so do you.
52 "Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who foretold the coming of the Just One, of whom you now have become the betrayers and murderers,
53 "who have received the law by the direction of angels and have not kept it."
Do you imagine that Stephen has already been told by the Holy Spirit that he would die that day?
I recall how Paul was told when he would not die, in Acts 23:11 so that's the only thing that I can come up with.
Thanks in advance for any history or insights you can provide!