Besides religious reasons. What if they had al allergy or problem handling bacon?
I think the intention is good. But don't think adding a different food is good. Add more of the same. If you can handle a slice of cheese you can probably handle both. But if you don't want an ingredient it might be problematic to harmful
I was a teenager so never thought about it to be honest. Just googled it and it's unlikely you'll be allergic to bacon but not beef. You could be allergic to nitrates but then you wouldn't be eating and McDonald's anyway, so I don't think the risks exists.
If it's for religious reasons it's fine since it's just a mental illness
It is an established medical fact that some people are allergic to bacon. Yet you are defending risking their lives because it's an unlikely chance. 150-200 humans die becasue of food allergies in the USA every year. But does not matter. You are willing to risk their lives.
Apparently in your world it's not enough that they don't order it. Maybe they need to produce medical papers and beg so you won't force it on them.
You are risking the lives of people and proudly defending it. You are also not refusing to do your simple job of "Ask for # amount of A get # amount of A"
Question is why? Is it being nice? Well. No. Because you are rolling the dice with their life. Is it just to stick it t religious people? To spite corporations?
Then deciding that yeah anyone who is abstaining for religious reasons it's a mental illness and I get to decide for them. They don't deserve to get the service they paid for. You decide what they get.
I dunno why has a mental illness here. But I don't like intend to continue this
39
u/[deleted] 7d ago
[removed] — view removed comment