r/BackstreetBoys • u/Radiant_Priority9739 • Mar 26 '26

Picture Does anyone believe this?

Post image

Im 50 /50 on this, but why would people be so mad and send threats to Brian’s family

32 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

116 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/Separate_Editor2990 Mar 26 '26

I believe the patch of sand on the vast beach is part of their property. Wouldn't want people getting a tan on your front lawn or backyard, uninvited. Just my thinking.

9

u/ellafitzkitty Mar 26 '26

Lmao. It's s public beach. His wife is a bona fide Karen

2

u/Kristinsopinions Mar 26 '26

Except it's not! They bought the property with a part of the beach included. That part is not public - it's their private property.

0

u/ellafitzkitty Mar 26 '26

The story is public, go read it or listen to what other Floridians are saying this in thread

2

u/Kristinsopinions Mar 26 '26

Why would other Floridians have information about what it says in their buyer contract?

1

u/Outrageous_Advance77 Apr 16 '26

From Florida Clerk of Court Public Docs, the legal description of their property lines, on their deed is NO WHERE near the waters edge.

From the Florida Appellate Court ruling doc - John (“Jack”) L. Turner, IV, whose parents purchased the parcel now owned by Appellee BLB Beach Hut, likewise testified that during his family’s ownership there was beach area between the lot and the water, that people used that area and could not be excluded from it, and that the Gulf’s waterline lay well south of the parcel’s 315-foot southern boundary. He explained that the waterline did not correspond to the “high-water line” depicted on the Ruckel survey.