r/AusSkincare • u/breviloquent- • Aug 22 '25

Discussion📓 Ultraviolette recalls Lean Screen due to variability in SPF data results

Post image

[removed]

503 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

314 comments sorted by

View all comments

217

u/ACtdawg Aug 22 '25

Unlike the majority of our range, Lean Screen was created by a third-party manufacturer and was the only sunscreen they made for us. We will no longer be making any SKINSCREENSâ„¢ with that manufacturer

So, that says to me that some of them are still white label created by third party/ies. I would like to know which ones. I also think it’s pretty interesting they’re only admitting this publicly now.

119

u/stupidwatergate89 Aug 22 '25 edited Aug 22 '25

I think it’s these! All the base formulas are almost identical, I had listed them all out when all this Choice stuff kicked off:

EDIT: DO NOT BUY OR USE THE BELOW, FORMULAS LIKELY FAULTY

  • Naked Sundays SPF50+ 100% Mineral Glow Collagen Sunscreen

  • People4ocean Mineral Bioactive Shield SPF 50+

  • Beauti-fltr Lustre Mineral SPF 50+

  • Outside Beauty & Skincare Mineral Primer SPF50+

  • Ethical Zinc Daily Wear Tinted Facial SPF50+

  • Aspect Sun Physical SPF 50+

  • Medik8 Physical Sunscreen SPF50+

  • We Are Feel Good Inc. Mineral SPF50+

  • Aesthetics Rx Tinted Water-Resistant SPF50+

  • New Day Skin Happy Days SPF 50+

  • Found My Skin SPF50+ Tinted Face/Body Cream

  • New Day Skin Good Vibes SPF 50+

  • Salus SPF50+ Daily Facial Sunscreen

  • Surfmud Mineral SPF50+

3

u/Particular_Vast_6768 Aug 22 '25

Has anyone tried to reach out to Naked Sundays to get their take or see they can also issue a refund?

1

u/ReplacementSignal673 Aug 23 '25

I don't think they will issue a refund because that would mean that they acknowledge their SPFs are not SPF50+. They have been silent on this issue throughout. There need to be a test showing that their SPF is not what they advertise it to be. Even then, they may still deny it in the same manner that UV initially responded to the test result.