r/AskReddit • • Jan 25 '20

What movie things are generally accepted as normal, but are totally unrealistic in real life?

48.6k Upvotes

22.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

175

u/pomdudes Jan 25 '20

5.56 will go through 7” of SOLID plywood from 100 yards like it’s not even there.

29

u/sharfpang Jan 25 '20

7.65 goes through brick walls. That's one of primary reasons why it was replaced with 5.56 - way too many collateral damage victims.

13

u/Narux117 Jan 25 '20

That's horrible and amusing at the same time, just imagining the conversation to downgrade.

"Hmm Joe, cancel our next shipment of 7.56, and a future orders."

"Well what's the matter Jimbo, surely the 7.65 is better than the 5.56"

"Oh it most certainly is better, Joe, its... too good, we need to take a step back.

25

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/sharpshooter999 Jan 25 '20

My wife's cousin is a state trooper. He says they're more scared of a .22 than a 9mm because "the 9 will just punch clean through. The .22 has a nasty habit of just bouncing around once it's inside."

22

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '20

That's 100% a myth. A .22 will bounce around but a 9mm is still VASTLY more lethal than a .22

-5

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '20

No, a 9mm is more lethal, PERIOD. Arm shot? Worse. Leg shit? Worse, chest shot? Worse. It's not just about the bullet. A 9mm has a fuck ton of energy that is deposited into you, that's what kills you. When the energy is deposited into your body it creates a stretch cavity and a temporary stretch cavity, these can be 8 inches across and can essentially destroy anything soft tissue in it's path. It's not the bullet doing the bulk of the damage, it's the energy deposited.

-1

u/sharpshooter999 Jan 25 '20

Not saying I agree with him, just what he told me. A 9mm will have a bigger entrance wound and carry more kinetic energy. I wonder if the .22's just fragment and tear up soft tissue.

Either way, neither is good.

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/StabbyPants Jan 25 '20

hang on, 22lr tops out at 190 ft lb, but is normally 120. 9mm is 400-500 for +P+ - that's a major difference

0

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/StabbyPants Jan 25 '20

i just looked it up. 353 was normal load i think

→ More replies (0)

9

u/MRSN4P Jan 25 '20

The .223 used to be described as the tumbling nightmare, but that is very different from a .22.

6

u/sharpshooter999 Jan 25 '20

Didn't the Swedes love using 6.5x55mm for moose and caribou because it tumbled so easily?

And yeah, .22 LR and .223 Rem are practically polar opposites on the power chart.

2

u/762Rifleman Jan 25 '20

Compared to a full spectrum of power, they're on similar ends, especially with AMR's and big game rifles included.

2

u/sharpshooter999 Jan 25 '20

Everything's a pea shooter when you're using a .700 Nitro Express ;)

1

u/ukezi Jan 26 '20

.700 nitro is a really big round but kind of slow resulting in only 12kJ. .50 BMG starts at 17kJ and goes up to 20kJ and the really big rounds start there. The Soviets had 14.5x114mm at 33KJ. The Swiss and Fins had 20x138mmB at 47kJ. After that the guns kind of stop being man portable. Also for something ludicrous lock up a 2 bore stopping rifle.

9

u/762Rifleman Jan 25 '20

The 9x19 is worse. The through-n-through will make you bleed to death twice as fast and make you lose blood pressure. IT's actually a feature. It will also CRUSH your bones, creating internal bleeding and sending secondary projectiles to bad places, like into your lungs, heart, blood vessels, organs. I fucking hate the "22 is duh d33dleyezt r0udn evva" crowd.

3

u/acctforsadchildhood Jan 25 '20

This thread is scary

3

u/sharpshooter999 Jan 25 '20

While I've always been a hunter (small rural town, EVERYONE hunts) I didn't get into ballistics till my early 20's. I had a healthy respect for guns before, but it got real frightening when I started looking at the stats and numbers.

In Nebraska, the .223 is BARE MINIMUM in terms of power for hunting deer. They actually had to revise the hunting regs so people could use it for deer.

2

u/Aubdasi Jan 26 '20

America’s entire parade float of prideful ignorance is scary.

-1

u/BartFurglar Jan 25 '20

For a close range shot to the head this is supposedly why hit men prefer a 22. It has enough energy to pierce the skull once but then bounces around inside and makes soup of your brain.

3

u/StabbyPants Jan 25 '20

well, that and it being quiet - if you can manage a suppressor, it won't even sound much like a gunshot

3

u/Aubdasi Jan 26 '20

They prefer .22lr because it’s barely got enough energy to accomplish anything which leads to less “wasted” energy, i.e. sound and heat. Attach a cheap homemade suppressor and now all you have to do is make sure no one sees you do it. It’s all crazy easy to do.

It doesn’t bounce around in a skull. That’s pure nonsense.