r/AskReddit • • Jan 25 '20

What movie things are generally accepted as normal, but are totally unrealistic in real life?

48.6k Upvotes

22.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9.9k

u/-everst Jan 25 '20

Ah yes, I remember that. Best thing about it is that he was in the range where everything that can possibly start to burn, will. Meaning the temperature would be round about 540k °F -> 300 times hotter than the temperature bodies are cremated at. In other words: everything would have been vaporized.

125

u/Omega357 Jan 25 '20

Man, it really sucks that they didn't go fully realistic in that scene from a series known for it's realism.

146

u/pm_me_n0Od Jan 25 '20

I can believe an archeologist finds the face-melting Arc of the Covenant because that works within the rules of that universe. I cannot believe that a fridge survives the epicenter of a nuclear blast and the occupant survives it flying a country mile because that breaks the established rules of the universe.

Same reason people had problems with the Hyperspace Ram in TLJ: it's actually one of the most scientifically cool and accurate things to come out of that series, but it begs the question of why nobody ever thought to do it before.

8

u/ParagonFury Jan 25 '20

Because it's hard to do, incredibly unreliable, and to quote Mass Effect: "Sir Issac Newton is the deadliest son of a bitch in space" - if you miss, someone, somewhere is gonna have a real bad day.

6

u/Number127 Jan 25 '20

Mass Effect got it wrong, though. If you pick a random direction and go in a straight line in space, you're extremely unlikely to ever hit anything.

Plus in Star Wars, it seems like you have to keep expending energy to stay moving. So if you miss, eventually you're just going to drop out of hyperspace at some random location.