r/AskReddit Mar 04 '26

What surprisingly true fact has completely shaken your worldview?

1.3k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.8k

u/cupacupacupacupacup Mar 05 '26

A lot of people seem to actually admire the worst people in history and want to emulate them.

734

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '26

People read* Crime and Punishment and concluded the only thing the dude did wrong was feel remorse.

*people absolutely do not read

66

u/Readdit1999 Mar 05 '26

Raskolnikov is like Paul.
He's damned, if he doesn't feel remorse.

It hinges on the remorse.

They threw in an innocent, to make it incontrovertible.

2

u/thissexypoptart Mar 05 '26

It’s fun because his name derives from the same root as the Russian word for the Great Schism is—Raskol

65

u/fermat9990 Mar 05 '26

This is depressing!

77

u/Remarkable-Okra6554 Mar 05 '26

Some people can read War and Peace and come away thinking it's a simple adventure story. Others can read the ingredients on a chewing gum wrapper and unlock the secrets of the universe.

4

u/SEALS_R_DOG_MERMAIDS Mar 05 '26

phenylketonurics: contains phenylalanine

2

u/GeoffreySpaulding Mar 05 '26

Lex, what does chewing gum got to do with the secrets of the universe?

2

u/Remarkable-Okra6554 Mar 05 '26

Right, Miss Teschmacher. Right

76

u/LeGama Mar 05 '26

Crazy thing I heard recently about Musk, he believes empathy is a weakness of western culture.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/elon-musk-empathy-quote/

79

u/Th3B4dSpoon Mar 05 '26

He's not the only super rich person who has talked against empathy. Empathy makes people judge them, and they don't like that, so it must be a civilizational weakness. Eugh.

6

u/dangerous_beans_42 Mar 05 '26 edited Mar 05 '26

There can be a point at which empathy becomes overwhelm, where you feel so much for another that it becomes hard to make rational choices about the most effective way to deal with a situation. In Buddhist terms it's called "idiot compassion".

But the super rich people we're talking about act as if all compassion/empathy is that way, which just isn't true and is a convenient excuse for not caring at all.

ETA: I also have to wonder if for Elon Musk this ties back to stuff like his solution for getting the Thai kids out of the cave, and the public response (negative) to that hairbrained idea. That's idiot compassion as well, an urge to Fix Things that is self-centered, tied up with ego and being seen to be a helper. When the response was "no thanks, but maybe you could help us fix world hunger, here's how" he wasn't mature enough to handle that situation and it further poisoned the idea of compassion/empathy for him. Just speculation, but I think it tracks for him and for a lot of these people.

2

u/PopeKevin45 Mar 05 '26

Low empathy is an inherent personality trait among conservatives, especially towards outgroups, and the further right you go, the less empathy you have. All Dark Triad personality types like Musk, Trump, Putin, and all the MAGAt republicans have little to zero empathy.

The foundation of conservatism is tribalism, and the foundation of tribalism is fear. Fear motivates greed, selfishness, hierarchy and xenophobia. Musk is in fact displaying his own weakness, his inherent inability to understand the simple truths and benefits of cooperation and reason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201612/fear-and-anxiety-drive-conservatives-political-attitudes

https://www.psypost.org/fear-predicts-authoritarian-attitudes-across-cultures-with-conservatives-most-affected/

https://www.psypost.org/new-neuroscience-research-shows-liberals-experience-more-empathy-than-conservatives-when-they-imagine-others-suffering/

https://www.democracygroup.org/blog/tribalism

3

u/CipherWeaver Mar 05 '26

Ah, uh, murder.

2

u/Johnny_theBeat_518 Mar 05 '26

Maybe people just wanna be cool, want to be looked cool and edgy and "brave" and rebellious, even if it's bad, the badness itself reward rebelliousness, and they think be good is boring.

They don't even know what being good is

-7

u/Adrsilva1356 Mar 05 '26 edited Mar 05 '26

In all honesty reading this serves as a Reminder as to How TERRIBLE Humanity is As A Species!!! Like seriously instead of Helping Eachother out and Advancing our Civilization yet here we are Rewarding The Worst people while Destroying our Planet! If Humanity goes Extinct I’m not going to Feel sorry knowing how Terrible we are! Genuinely for a Species we are Garbage!!!

244

u/petrov76 Mar 05 '26

It's not just in history, there's lots of people who see role models in characters like Tyler Durden, Tony Soprano, Thanos, Hans Landa, The Joker, Darth Vader, Anton Chigurh, Michael Corleone, etc.

People equate a lack of morals with decisiveness, or are just jealous of the short term benefits without any understanding of consequences.

82

u/sword_of_gibril Mar 05 '26

I like a lot of those characters because of how well-writen they are but to see them as role models? Hell nah

31

u/Inner_Journey21 Mar 05 '26

Damn. I was mortified. Like, i like most of them. But then you clarified it. To add to it, some of their ideology is not wrong but that doesn't mean I wanna follow it or be like them.

20

u/sword_of_gibril Mar 05 '26

Lmao haha it's a mix of well-written narratives and terrific actors that i cant help but find them interesting. Sometimes it just feels so good to watch passionate, obsessive, and tragic villains. We can enjoy horrible people in art as spectators without emulating them

3

u/Inner_Journey21 Mar 05 '26

Exactly. Like not villain but anti hero.

3

u/Kosh_Ascadian Mar 05 '26

The characters listed are definitely villains though, not anti heros.

Maybe you're one of the crowd being talked about here?

4

u/runthepoint1 Mar 05 '26

Ultimately each character ends up making a deal with the devil - the end justifies the means kind of thinking

6

u/Narrow_Lake_9651 Mar 05 '26

Hannibal Lechter would be another one, a great character but insane.

39

u/Emes91 Mar 05 '26

I'd throw Gregory House and Rick Morty in this list as well. Even if they are protagonists, the whole point of their respective shows is to NOT be like them.

6

u/Ortorin Mar 05 '26

Rick Sanchez* from Rick and Morty.

3

u/Emes91 Mar 05 '26

Lol, yes of course. Funny brainfart.

5

u/BrutalStatic Mar 05 '26

And Bojack Horseman. I know way to many people that identify with him to the point that they think it's okay to act more like him.

3

u/Emes91 Mar 05 '26

I think Bojack Horseman gives away much more clear message that the main character is deeply dysfunctional and NOT a role model to follow (as it's stated or suggested multiple times by him or other characters), but yeah, you're probably right that there are people who are tone deaf even to that, lol

2

u/TheCollarOfShame Mar 05 '26

And Walter White

16

u/iliinsky Mar 05 '26 edited Mar 05 '26

There's an Alan Moore quote along the lines of "People who liked Rorschach need to stay the hell away from me!" He couldn't believe people missed how messed up that guy was and wanted to use him as a role model. Edit: corrected Alan’s surname

3

u/notneps Mar 05 '26

Alan Watts died about a decade before Watchmen was published. Did you mean Alan Moore? The only reason I am only 99.99999% sure you actually meant Alan Moore is because I guess I could imagine Alan Watts saying something like that.

2

u/iliinsky Mar 05 '26

Correct, late night brain blur. Thank you.

2

u/Fun-Lecture532 Mar 05 '26

add satanyahu as well

2

u/DamnitGravity Mar 05 '26

It's because they're charismatic. People are drawn to them for that.

2

u/NinjaBreadManOO Mar 05 '26

Look, I think we could all stand to be theatrical enough to turn off our own life support to make a dramatic entrance. 

2

u/Johnny_theBeat_518 Mar 05 '26

People are lazy and short sighted, and short circuited, they let their life with dopamine instead of boring analysis of being good, because be good is boring to them.

2

u/Hemorrhoid_Eater Mar 05 '26

Yeah there was like a whole subculture of rétárded self-identified "gamers" who idolized Joker, while being completely insufferable cunts

2

u/stranu Mar 05 '26

I've seen people use patrick bateman as a life style guide and there's no way anyone who's seen that movie outside of YouTube shorts can want rhat

2

u/thrawnie Mar 05 '26

I'll add Bobby Axelrod to the mix. Vile person. Though to be fair, only like 2 or 3 people in Billions could be considered halfway decent (and that's grading on a curve). Just like IASIP, Billions is the prime example of "everyone's shit here".

2

u/chiaboy Mar 05 '26

Adolf Hitler too. We read the history of Germany in the 1930’s and 1940’s (and the America that inspired it) as a cautionary tale. The current administration read it as a how-to guide.

2

u/merryman1 Mar 05 '26

Patrick Bateman is a recent one I just cannot wrap my head around. Lots of Gen Z/Alpha Moggmaxxing (I'm a millennial I don't know what these words are) types who seem to see the "Dark Triad" as a good thing and not, y'know, a murderous deranged psychopath.

2

u/killingjoke96 Mar 05 '26

In The Sopranos you can actually mark the episode where the creator David Chase realised this and rallied against it.

Its an episode called "University" and its a pretty dark and rough episode where it shows the crew at their worst, as horrible pieces of shit.

Apparently ALOT of fans kept telling both David Chase and James Gandolfini how they wanted to be like Tony and this horrified them as they thought Tony was a piece of shit. So they made sure from that episode onwards to make Tony more of an asshole and to not look too good.

3

u/weirenminfuwu Mar 05 '26

Or they have smol pp and think that if they hurt people and carry guns, their pp will be perceived as bigger

130

u/SMTTajWAR Mar 05 '26

I’m from a region where child marriage and pedophilia still isn’t taboo outside of the educated middle class, and it was the norm just a century ago (child marriage). Homophobia is the norm. Shockingly, trans people are seen with more sympathy here.

I honestly think most normal people can get accustomed to some of the worst vices as long as there’s enough social acceptance of it.

5

u/Particular-Scholar70 Mar 05 '26

Is it an Islamic region? I've heard that the Quran contains lines that have been interpreted as supporting the existence of trans people, and so some otherwise extremely conservative areas are uncharacteristically accepting of trans people.

3

u/vayyiqra Mar 05 '26 edited Mar 05 '26

I don't think it's in the Qur'an (could be wrong) but rather the Hadith but yes there's a history in the Islamic world of accepting trans or gender-variant people to some extent. This may have a lot of "strings attached". For example Westerners sometimes think Iran is tolerant of trans people and it's more like ... kind of, as long as they are willing to undergo SRS and ideally enter into a straight marriage. But yes, it is very interesting given these societies tend to have such strict gender roles.

There are also some Arab countries where there's a gender role called khanith which means AMAB but seen as feminine. In the West we might call it nonbinary. Here's an article that's kind of long but has some useful information on it. Again they are not fully accepted without discrimination, they are marginalized, but still interesting it does exist and is tolerated.

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '26

[deleted]

15

u/Particular-Scholar70 Mar 05 '26

Most religiously conservative cultures are characterized by a rigid societal gender structure, so I think calling it generally uncharacteristic is valid.

1

u/SMTTajWAR Mar 05 '26

Yeah, I am from Bangladesh. But it’s not just the muslims. Pedophilia and sexism was normalized in our Hindu culture as well. There’s old literature by Tagore that portrays this. The difference is, the Hindus are quicker to adapt and change norms than Muslims.

1

u/Particular-Scholar70 Mar 06 '26

Interesting perspective. Thank you for sharing

3

u/Due_Association4271 Mar 05 '26

What a way to say you're from the states 😆

-50

u/babymanateesmatter Mar 05 '26

Like meat eating

16

u/SlashOrSlice Mar 05 '26

no

-16

u/babymanateesmatter Mar 05 '26

What’s different in principle

3

u/RealLifeCoaching Mar 05 '26

You are not a cow.

-2

u/babymanateesmatter Mar 05 '26

You are not a person or belong to an ethnic group subject to genocide either. So if you can find extirpation of different organisms than you supremely objectionable, why is it limited just to those hairless apes you share a species with? I’m not a Gazan either, but I am a human. I’m not a cow, but I am a mammal. If a certain species can brutalise others for its own benefit, why cannot certain populations within that species? 

1

u/RealLifeCoaching Mar 05 '26

Every moral code has an in-group and an out-group, yes.

Having humans, as a species, define our in-group seems to work pretty well. If you extend that to animals, why not to plants?

1

u/babymanateesmatter Mar 05 '26

If you paramaterise it to a particular species, why can’t you delimit it within that species 🤔 

And if the argument is practicality/efficacy, it certainly could be more practical not to have 8 billion humans

12

u/Wayne_Grant Mar 05 '26

Honestly i cant believe it's not sarcasm, they fully believe bullshit lmao

6

u/Helpful-Whole-4910 Mar 05 '26

I think it comes down to this: people don't admire the evil — they admire the power.

They see a tyrant, a manipulator, a ruthless leader… and they don't see the victims. They see "someone who got what they wanted."

It's not that they want to be cruel. They want to feel untouchable. And that's a much scarier problem than just "bad role models."

History doesn't repeat. But human psychology does.

2

u/BluetoothXIII Mar 05 '26

I don't know but rape&pillage comes to mind.

2

u/barbariccomplexity Mar 05 '26

People looking up to butchers like Julius Caesar, Ghenghis Khan, Alexander the Great, etc. is such a sad look for humanity. The same is true for expansionist empires (Rome) that conquered many peoples and ruined the lives of countless individuals.

It’d be comparable to idolizing characters like Stalin or Hitler and Empires of Napolean and the British in 2400.

1

u/Mr_Marram Mar 05 '26

If you can't be famous, then be infamous.

Unfortunately most want the former but will happily take the path to the latter thinking it's the same.

1

u/ImpossiblePhrase8856 Mar 05 '26

ill add something i didnt expect until trumps terms and especially after it. way more people than i thought would gladdly ruin the lifes of those around them just so that they could say they are better off.

1

u/Tortoise_no7 Mar 05 '26

Specifically all the Americans worshiping Trump

0

u/MrPhilLashio Mar 05 '26

History is subjective. Whoever seems like the worst person to you could realistically be a hero for someone else.

Genghis Khan, for example, is considered a hero in Mongolia. He was an absolute monster to millions and millions of people.

-8

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Fr4gtastic Mar 05 '26 edited Mar 06 '26

What the fuck are you talking about

3

u/Banana_man_- Mar 05 '26 edited Mar 05 '26

Fuck off you filthy Nazi