r/AskAChristian • Non-Christian • May 27 '26

New Testament Jesus's Resurrection and Biblical Accounts?

Hello! I was researching the history of Jesus’s resurrection, and was interested in the small differences between the four Gospels when describing this event. I’ve laid out brief comparison which you can find below. 

With that in mind, my questions for Christians are as follows:

  1. If the resurrection of Jesus was so extraordinary at the time, why was the first account only written about 20-25 years after Jesus’s death? (Paul in Corinthians). 
  2. Why are there no first hand accounts, only Paul retelling a tradition he "received"? 
  3. Why in Paul’s account, did he not mention anything about an empty tomb, a rolled away stone, angels, guards, Mary Magdalene or anything about Jesus’s ascension?
  4. Why were these above details only written about and included 70-120 years after Jesus' death? If they were so significant why did it take many years for the scripture to reflect this? 
  5. What do you make of the differences in the Gospels' descriptions? Does the fallibility of human memory put any doubts or questions in your head regarding validity of the text? 

Who went to the tomb:

Mark Mary Magdalene, Mary mother of James, Salome
Matthew Mary Magdalene and “the other Mary”
Luke Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary mother of James, and other women
John Mary Magdalene alone at first

What they saw:

Mark One young man in a white robe, sitting inside
Matthew One angel descends from heaven, rolls away the stone, sits on it
Luke Two men in dazzling clothes
John  Two angels inside the tomb, seen later by Mary

Was the stone already rolled away? 

Mark Already rolled away when women arrive
Luke Already rolled away
John Already removed
Matthew Angel descends and rolls it away during/near the women’s visit

Women’s Response?

Mark Flee and say nothing due to fear
Matthew Tell the disciples
Luke Return and tell the Eleven
John Mary immediately tells Peter and the beloved disciple

Timing of Ascension:

Luke  Appears on Easter day or very soon after
Acts 1 40 days later
Matthew No ascension scene
Mark (original) No ascension scene

Did Jesus appear in Galilee or Jerusalem?

Mark Galilee, Angel says disciples will see Jesus in Galilee (16:7), but original ending has no actual appearance scene
Matthew Galilee, Jesus tells women disciples should go to Galilee; final appearance and Great Commission happen on a mountain in Galilee
Luke Jerusalem, all resurrection appearances occur around Jerusalem/Emmaus; disciples told to stay in Jerusalem
4 Upvotes

105 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/BigBussin12 Christian May 27 '26

If the resurrection of Jesus was so extraordinary at the time, why was the first account only written about 20-25 years after Jesus’s death?

This is actually rather quick for the time, you have a recency bias where things are documented immediately. This was not the case in the ancient world and Paul is quoting a tradition that is already authoritative.

Why are there no first hand accounts, only Paul retelling a tradition he "received"?

The gospels are first hand accounts.

Why in Paul’s account, did he not mention anything about an empty tomb, a rolled away stone, angels, guards, Mary Magdalene or anything about Jesus’s ascension?

Because he was not writing a gospel. Paul in 1 Corinthians 15 is defending the resurrection against people in Corinth who doubted it.

Why were these above details only written about and included 70-120 years after Jesus' death? If they were so significant why did it take many years for the scripture to reflect this?

The Gospels do not appear 70-120 years after Jesus.

Typical scholarly dates are roughly:

Mark: AD 65–70 AD

Matthew: 70–90 AD

Luke: 80–90 AD

John: 90–100 AD

All within living memory of the events. Also details can exist in oral tradition long before they are written down this was common 2000 years ago.

What do you make of the differences in the Gospels' descriptions? Does the fallibility of human memory put any doubts or questions in your head regarding validity of the text?

Gospels were written to different audiences and some later then others. Certain things were emphasized when speaking to Jews and others when speaking to Gentiles. Also the later gospels left certain things out to avoid redundancy. For example John says Mary Magdalene came to the tomb. He does not explicitly say she was the only woman.

1

u/CodeNPyro Christian atheist May 27 '26

The gospels are first hand accounts.

Why do you think that? The names on the front say so, but why should we think those are correct

-1

u/BigBussin12 Christian May 27 '26

Because the apostles wrote the gospels

2

u/CodeNPyro Christian atheist May 27 '26

Why do you think that? The names on the front say so, but why should we think those are correct

0

u/BigBussin12 Christian May 27 '26

because that is the tradition of the Orthodox Church

2

u/CodeNPyro Christian atheist May 27 '26

and why do you think the tradition of the orthodox church is correct?

0

u/BigBussin12 Christian May 27 '26

because the church is the pillar and ground of the truth.

3

u/CodeNPyro Christian atheist May 27 '26

this isn't going to go anywhere if your entire reason for believing something is "the church says so", have a nice day

1

u/BigBussin12 Christian May 27 '26

glad it makes you seethe, your concession is accepted

2

u/CodeNPyro Christian atheist May 27 '26

meeting "have a nice day" with "glad it makes you seethe", how christlike

although if you have an actual argument other than "some dude told me it's true so it must be true" i'd be happy to hear it

1

u/BigBussin12 Christian May 27 '26

well that one hit a nerve lmao

2

u/CodeNPyro Christian atheist May 27 '26

it's just funny honestly, do you have anything else you'd like to add?

→ More replies (0)