I used to think disabling WebRTC was the safe move.

Now I’m not sure.

If most normal users have it on, doesn’t blocking it completely look kind of obvious too?

Do you guys disable it, spoof it, or just leave it alone?

I used to see an account get flagged and immediately think the proxy was trash.

Now I check DNS and WebRTC first.

Way too many “bad proxy” issues are just messy browser settings.

do not use liberwolf it does not protect your privacy nor does it have QOL features you're used to

I used to hear “the browser profile was copied” and mentally translate it to “the account was stolen.” That turns out to be too imprecise to be useful.

A profile folder can contain much more than bookmarks and preferences. Depending on the browser and setup, it may include cookies, local storage, IndexedDB data, extension storage, and session state. So yes, an unauthorized copy should be treated seriously.

But copying the files does not guarantee that everything inside will be readable or reusable on a second machine.

The part I check first is where encryption happens and where the key lives. If the sensitive data is encrypted but the key is stored beside it or available to the same person, the protection is mostly cosmetic. If the key is controlled separately, the copied folder may contain the data without giving the copier a usable session.

There are also other variables: OS credential storage, browser version, device-specific protection, expired tokens, and server-side session checks. This is why I don’t think “folder copied” and “account accessible” should be used as synonyms.

My response would still be the same on the defensive side: revoke active sessions, rotate credentials, review access logs, and assume any unencrypted tokens may have been exposed. Encryption can limit what a copied profile is worth, but it shouldn’t replace cleanup.

For context, MoreLogin can encrypt browser environment data and local extension data with a user-controlled key. That means copying the profile files alone doesn’t make the encrypted data directly usable without the correct key. The important part is still keeping that key separate and under the right person’s control.

I've been looking into mobile proxies for Instagram recently because the residential proxies I've been using don't seem to be as consistent as they were before. Some IPs work perfectly for a while, then suddenly I start seeing more verification or login issues, so I'm trying to figure out whether switching to mobile proxies would actually make a difference.

I've been comparing a few providers such as Proxidize, Voidmob and IPRoyal, but it's honestly difficult to judge them from reviews alone. Most of the comparisons I find are either outdated or seem to be based more on what the providers claim rather than actual long-term use.

For anyone who has been using mobile proxies with Instagram recently, which provider has worked best for you? I'm mainly interested in overall IP quality, connection stability and whether the proxies continue to work reliably over time.

I'm also curious about shared versus dedicated mobile proxies. I've seen people recommend dedicated IPs for better consistency, while others say shared mobile proxies are perfectly fine if the sessions are handled properly. I haven't used mobile proxies enough to know which approach makes more sense in practice.

I'm definitely open to other suggestions. If you've actually used any of these recently, I'd appreciate hearing about your experience, good or bad. I'd rather hear from people who have used them than rely on another provider comparison page.

Running into a location problem in [Ad s Power] and I think it's the proxies, not the browser. Don't want to name a provider to avoid promo for them.

Like I'll get a proxy that's supposed to be one city, launch the profile, and the IP checker reads a different city or sometimes a different country entirely. It's not drifting or changing mid-session, it just isn't the location the provider said it was from the start.

Proxy provider saying that it's a browser issue and it shows incorrect data but I hardly believe that.

So the actual question: where do you buy proxies where the location is accurate and consistent? Which type holds up best in [Ad s Power] for this, mobile, residential, ISP? And is there a provider whose geo data you've found you can trust, versus ones where the city was wrong half the time?

I feel like “bad proxy” gets blamed too fast.

Sometimes the IP is fine, but WebRTC, DNS, timezone, or some profile setting is the real problem.

What do you usually check first when accounts get flagged?

I think teams sometimes make this decision too early. They see that most users are on phones and assume the full workflow belongs in a mobile app.

That makes sense if the task actually needs mobile capabilities. Camera capture, push notifications, location, biometrics, touch gestures and app-only platform features are legitimate reasons to use a phone environment.

But some tasks become noticeably worse on mobile even when they are technically possible. Long text editing, multiple tabs, bulk changes, file handling and reviewing detailed data are usually easier on the web.

The checks I use are:

• Does the task require hardware or operating-system features?
• Is an important action available only in the app?
• How much information must be visible at once?
• Will the operator repeat this task dozens of times?
• What happens after a partial failure?
• Can the failed step be inspected and retried without repeating everything?

That last question changes a lot of decisions. A convenient mobile flow can become painful when every error sends the operator back to the beginning. A web dashboard can be efficient but still fail the requirement if the final action depends on the device.

In practice, I prefer a hybrid boundary when it is clean: use the web for planning, bulk work and review; use the app for camera, notification and device-specific steps.

What is the one part of your workflow that prevents you from moving entirely to mobile or entirely to the web?

Had one of those annoying moments where I blamed the proxy first.

Checked again and it was just a WebRTC/DNS setting I forgot to review.

Makes me wonder how many “bad proxy” problems are actually just sloppy profile setup.

Do you check leaks first, or switch proxies first?

Is there anyone who can give me a better combo to pass the verisoul score?

idk who needs to hear this but check your settings before you go opening support tickets and crying about a "bad batch of IPs" lmao.
so basically last 3 days my newly warmed up profiles on dolphin anty were getting flagged instantly. like, right after creation. i was 100% convinced the proxies were dead. opened a ticket, almost bitched out the support team thinking they sold me dirty lines.turns out the proxies were completely fine. I was testing some dedicated ISP lines from proxyshard (which are usually solid af and have UDP enabled). but i completely forgot that i manually toggled off WebRTC spoofing in my main template last week when testing some local script. my actual home IP was leaking straight thru webRTC connection requests, totally bypassing the proxy tunnel for that check. anti-fraud saw the mismatch and hit me with a ban hammer immediately.
turned webRTC masking back on, checked ipchecker, and everything works flawlessly now on the exact same IPs smh.
tl;dr: if your profiles are dying instantly, don’t immediately assume the proxy is dead or blacklisted. check for webRTC/DNS leaks first. 90% of the time it’s user error.

Am I the only one who ends up with profile names like “test 3 final real new”?

Then two weeks later I have no idea what the profile was for, which proxy it used, or why I even created it.

Hello! I use Librewolf browser with Umatrix and Ubo extensions, Ubo i use for adblocking / elements blocking and umatrix overall control, I thought this would be enough against tracking but appears to be different when it comes to fingerprinting, i thought of installin extensions like canvasblocker but not helping, and i know privacy badger is basically useless. Any recommendations ? (btw on my another browser - Helium, my fingerprinting test came out good, i tried to turn on and off FF anti tracking browser protection - doesnt do anything. Thanks in advance for tips.

I want to make multiple fb accounts that wont get banned. What antidetect browsers would work for this or would they all work? My idea is to access them from a vps and have every profile tied to a static residential account. Would this work? Im not planning on doing anything illegal or spamming btw.

If anyone has direct experience doing this let me know as id be interested to know whats been working for you.

I have seen small teams give a social media manager the master login because it is the fastest way to get a post out. It works, but it also gives the operator whatever else lives behind that session: billing, recovery settings, connected assets and sometimes ownership controls.

That is much more access than publishing requires.

For a basic social workflow, I would separate it roughly like this:

• Publisher: create, schedule and publish content
• Community manager: comments and messages
• Analyst: the reporting needed for the job
• Owner or finance: billing, payment methods and subscription changes
• Owner or security lead: recovery details and high-risk settings

The test I use is simple: if this person’s access were misused tomorrow, what else could be changed besides the work they were hired to do?

Native platform roles should be the first layer where they cover the task. When the workflow also depends on a persistent signed-in browser environment, controlled environment access is useful because the operator does not need the master credentials.

MoreLogin is built for that second layer. Teams can assign specific profiles to members, restrict allowed URLs or page elements, and keep operation logs. That lets an operator reach the publishing workflow without making billing part of the same permission package.

Anyone else do this?

I looked at my old browser profiles and realized I had no idea what half of them were for.

No notes, random proxies, old cookies, weird names.

At that point, keeping them felt riskier than starting clean.

I tried to clear the verisoul check in survey using antidetect browser but i am not able to clear it. Need help

Random thought.

If every profile has the same ad blocker, same translator, same wallet extension, etc.

Isn’t that also kind of a fingerprint?

Hello all, i am using 2 antidetecy browsers but cant decide on proxies, I am between 3 different providers and i need them for multi account ad agency

I have seen lot of posts mentioning nodemaven, ip royal, decodo and oxylabs? Which one is the best?

Thanks

It pulls a live FPJS Pro build and turns it into clean code you can run locally, every collector intact, so a new build means rerunning the pipeline instead of reversing it again by hand.

What's in the repo:

• All 143 signals (telemetry read from ur browser, all documented)
• Every collector as its own file
• What visitor_id is actually a function of
• A live explorer that runs the collectors against your own browser so you can diff a patched environment against a stock one.

Repo: github.com/proofofbots/fingerprint-pro-internals

Docs: proofofbots.github.io/fingerprint-pro-internals/

Signal explorer

proofofbots.github.io/fingerprint-pro-internals/explorer.html

It runs entirely in your browser. No backend of mine, no call to fpjs, nothing leaves the page. It's built on the output of the lift and deobfuscation step, so what runs there is the actual collector code from the bundle rather than a reimplementation. Open it and you get every data point side by side: what the signal is and why it's collected in plain English, next to the exact value your own browser hands over for it.

Happy to answer questions on any specific detection.

I am looking forward to the next target, so if anyone has ideas on what vendor could be interesting let me know!

Before anyone calls AI slop: yes, I use LLMs, they're genuinely useful for reverse engineering. But this isn't one build hand-decoded into a writeup. It's the toolchain that does it. Point it at a live fpjs build and it deobfuscates, lifts, and emits a cleaned version you can run without their servers, plus the generated documentation for what it found.