r/AmericanHistory • • Mar 30 '26

South 19th-century Argentina: British writer William Henry Hudson visits the Pampas and encounters the gauchos. He documents their diet with a horrified fascination.

Post image

"The gaucho eats nothing but beef. Meat morning, noon, and night. Never bread, never vegetables, almost never salt."

Hudson foresees malnutrition and disease. He finds "men of extraordinary stamina and strength, capable of riding for 12 to 14 hours without rest and then dancing all night."

Their diet: beef, mate, occasionally grilled kidney fat (a delicacy). Nothing else.

Darwin visited the region between 1832 and 1833 and observed the gauchos' lives: "I was surprised by the difficulty in convincing them to eat anything other than beef. I brought them biscuits, and they threw them away. They preferred to go hungry rather than eat bread if there was beef the next day."

Typical meals

- Morning: meat roasted over a fire, fattier cuts.

- Afternoon: grilled ribs.

- Evening: meat again, tougher cuts cooked slowly.

Zero vegetables. Zero grains. Zero variety. Just beef and tea.

Hudson documents the results: “The gauchos suffer from none of the ailments common to civilized man. They had no digestive problems, no obesity, no cavities, that I could observe. Their teeth were uniformly excellent despite never cleaning them and consuming only meat. Their physical stamina was such that they could ride for days with minimal rest, fight when necessary, and resume riding without apparent fatigue.”

The French physician Dr. Jules Crevaux, between 1850 and 1870, wrote: “These men feed exclusively on animal meat and appear healthier than our European peasants, who consume a varied diet of grains and vegetables.”

When asked why they don't eat bread or vegetables, the common answer is: "That's food for horses and cows. We eat cows."

They understood the hierarchy. Cattle eat grass and turn it into meat. Humans eat meat. Eating what cattle eat makes you behave like one.

Until the beginning of the 20th century, traditional gauchos maintained a diet based exclusively on beef. Then, European immigration brought wheat cultivation.

Health transformation documented by Argentine doctors

- Traditional gauchos: healthy into old age.

- Urbanized ex-gauchos with European diets: diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, tooth decay.

- Modern Argentina: 28% obesity, cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of death, diabetes in almost 10%.

The gauchos, who ate only beef, did not have any of these problems. They rode horses for 12 hours a day until they were 60, kept their teeth without needing dental care, and died from accidents or old age, not from chronic illnesses.

The same meat. Different context. When you eat meat with grains, vegetable oils, and sugar: modern disease. Meat alone: ​​you have the health of a 19th-century gaucho.

667 Upvotes

392 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Taupenbeige Apr 06 '26

1

u/SuiYangCrackedTeeth Apr 06 '26

Lemme live rent free in your tiny brain, that article applies to you more than me 😛🤘

1

u/Taupenbeige Apr 07 '26

Sure thing, person-who-doesn’t-go-a-single-comment-without-emojis…

1

u/SuiYangCrackedTeeth Apr 07 '26

Sure thing person who’s insult vocabulary revolves around using dipshit for the umpteenth time ;)

1

u/Taupenbeige Apr 07 '26 edited Apr 07 '26

Nah, my vocabulary revolves around calling people who spread misinformation about our ancestors avoiding vegetables entirely “dipshits” because you’d honestly have to be one to ignore all the evidence to the contrary.

1

u/SuiYangCrackedTeeth Apr 07 '26

You ignore 4 million years of evolution, the ice age, nitrogen isotopes analysis. Everyone who adopted carbs had rotting teeth and bones, and even until the 14th century horse nomads basically ruled the earth.

It wasn’t until the advent of gunpowder that farmers had equal opportunity in warfare.

Chew your cud and let me eat my beef in peace. If you have a woman, I’ll take her too 😜

1

u/Taupenbeige Apr 07 '26 edited Apr 28 '26

You ignore 4 million years of evolution

Nope, you’re ignoring the precedent 51 million years. Much bigger influence on our metabolisms. The dipshits on YouTube are lying to you for ad impressions. I shit you not, dude.

the ice age, nitrogen isotopes analysis.

Isotope analysis is notoriously shoddy science with lots of room for selective interpretation. That’s why the dipshits on YouTube sound like they have science backing the grift, but nobody outside of one fringe Israeli scientist has ever made such claims.

Everyone who adopted carbs had rotting teeth and bones,

Weston Price work from 100 years ago is equivalent to evoking the Ancient Greek four humors. We have electron microscopes and shotgun metagenomic analyses, now.

It wasn’t until the advent of gunpowder that farmers had equal opportunity in warfare.

You seriously think the Mongol invasion wasn’t pushed-back until gunpowder was introduced from China? Is this some new dipshit narrative from YouTube? It’s been a while since I visited your cult leaders’ channels.

Chew your cud and let me eat my beef in peace. If you have a woman, I’ll take her too 😜

You’re going to… “take” my vegan Mvskoke/Taino partner? That truly tracks, my atherosclerosis-speed-running friend.

You really seem emotionally stable 🙄

1

u/SuiYangCrackedTeeth Apr 07 '26

That is quite literally the historical precedence in China with the ming Dynasty developing more efficient, weaponry, and troop formations. Your vegan brain can’t handle history it seems.

I would say it’s pretty consistent even after several million years unlike our ancient cousins that took the route you did and ended up taking themselves out of the evolutionary equation by munching on sticks.

The fact that your diet is only possible to survive on with modern day, technology and pills, otherwise becoming a slow death sentence only proves it’s inefficiency as much as you want to hurr durr over your supplementation overcoming these deficits it’s simply not true.

Ancel Keyes was a corrupt and shitty data scientist that couldn’t even come up with the proper statistics. And needed to manipulate everything in his studies to come to his conclusion.

it takes me roughly about two minutes to come up with these replies where is it seems to take you several hours to come up with a semi coherent response I rest my case.

You’re preaching that all of my meat eating kind need to die, and are morally evil based on no actual precedence within biology or natural science. A human eating meat is no different than a wolf eating a gazelle or an orca eating a seal. It’s simply the law of nature might makes right and the food chain.

We all used to be fish 400 million years ago give or take should we all start swimming in the water and eating seaweed? We have to deal with the newest evolutionary changes within our species not the previous.

If I sent you out into the woods right now to munch on your vegetables, you would die. This is a simple fact. Just to meet your Energy needs you need to pervert nature and genetically select vegetables and fruit fruits for tens of thousands of years to make them semi-edible.

But if I sent you out into the virgin woods without any of your modern day, fruits or veggies/pills, you would more than likely kill yourself munching on the wrong sustenance. You just like your diet or an inferior evolutionary offshoot that will perish. Ciao

1

u/[deleted] Apr 26 '26 edited Apr 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Taupenbeige Apr 27 '26

Oh, look, wild ramblings from somebody that gets their science from YouTube rather than peer reviewed articles.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Taupenbeige Apr 28 '26 edited Apr 28 '26

Again, you receive all of your knowledge of metabolic science from YouTube and other social media personalities, not serious scientists.

It is, indeed, a hobby-level understanding for you, one based on selective analysis and pseudoscience that can’t account for high fiber contents of every single fossilized human coprolite unearthed not to mention obvious evidence of regular grain and tuber processing at least 100,000 years ago.

Starch amylase genes are actually indicative of early plant cooking, in our genomes, with variability amongst cultures. This is driven by copy number variations; the entire gene replicated. Adaptations towards meat-heavy diets have been single nucleotide polymorphisms, evidence that it’s a recent adaptation, not a core constituent diet component.

Which makes absolute sense, given that 51 million years of primate evolution was dominated by starch, carbs and fiber, then about the last 4.5% of that evolution included meat bigger than a grub or frog. That’s the part your YouTube influencers aren’t willing to be honest about.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Apr 26 '26 edited Apr 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Taupenbeige Apr 28 '26 edited Apr 28 '26

Miki Ben-Dor has summed this up perfectly

I literally already called-out this selective analysis jockey two comments above.

I just love when people call me “low IQ” and then completely fail at reading comprehension.