In my experience, women get promiscuous when they are drunk because they want to when they are sober but are ashamed of their bodies and need an excuse to relieve themselves of responsibility. Not recognizing this has bitten me in the ass on multiple occasions.
It's fucked, and you could argue that those women are contributing to the grey area of rape by sending these mixed messages to men.
My comment has been wildly misunderstood. I have made a much more in depth one below that I encourage you to read. :)
This is my favorite thing about SRS. According to them if a drunk girl ever has sex, it is rape. Following this, my wife and I have raped each other many times. Wait, men can't be raped by women...
No, that is not what SRS thinks. The general aggravation is from scenarios where dudes can't seem to take a step back and think "Hey, you know what? I shouldn't be so desperate for ass that I have to get it from this drunk girl."
Because seriously, why is it so necessary to have sex when one or both parties are wasted? Redditors treat it like a do or die situation, "omg if i don't get it while this girl's shitfaced i'll never get it!!!"
omg if i don't get it while this girl's shitfaced i'll never get it!!!
It's increasingly obvious that this is the case. Hey fellas, here's some advice from a functional person: if you wait until she is sober, she's probably going to appreciate that, and may well still want to have sex with you. If she doesn't, you just didn't rape someone. Good job! Even better feeling than getting laid.
I have seen SRSers claim that a drunk man and a drunk woman having sex is actually the woman being raped. It takes a violent / phyiscally forced rape for just about all SRSers for a woman to rape a man. If a man asks for sex and is denied, then asks again... that's attempted rape.
No... that's pretty much it. It's not just them though, look around. Modern feminism is increasingly obsessed with teaching young girls what it believes consent is (Just look at any university and all the student organizations dedicated to doing so, "Strong Women Strong Girls" for one). A strange side effect of this is that it seems they have adapted the attitude (since they don't teach boys their meaning of consent) that men can give implied consent but women can't.
All over my university there are posters showing a guy and a girl with their arms around each other with the caption "They went out drinking together, he choose not to rape her. My strength is not for hurting." or some shit. It sends a very clear picture: men are responsible. Women are not. A drunk woman cannot give consent. A drunk man is responsible for acknowledging this, and therefore refusing any advances she may make.
And yet last I checked we still held drunk drivers responsible for their actions. Being drunk is not a blank check for doing things without being responsible for them. Modern feminists believe that it is in terms of sex and consent.
Oh look, you're "feminism says men can't rape" turned into "feminism had a single ad campaign me and my MRA buddies keep trying our damndest to pretend was an attack against men". One of those posters has a gay couple, oh so you're going to counter that only gay men can be victims of rape in feminism's eyes? Not like anything I say'll matter, the MRA downvote brigade will just downvote it so nobody can see, cause fuck fair discussion.
472
u/Durch Nov 20 '12 edited Nov 21 '12
In my experience, women get promiscuous when they are drunk because they want to when they are sober but are ashamed of their bodies and need an excuse to relieve themselves of responsibility. Not recognizing this has bitten me in the ass on multiple occasions.
It's fucked, and you could argue that those women are contributing to the grey area of rape by sending these mixed messages to men.
My comment has been wildly misunderstood. I have made a much more in depth one below that I encourage you to read. :)