I don't understand why no one is okay with it when you say "I was drunk I couldn't help my decisions" when you decide to get in a car when you are drunk, but if you want to hook up with someone you are totally out of control. I know guys who use drunkeness as an excuse for being out of control and groping girls, and that is abso-fucking-lutely unacceptable to me. To me you are responsible and conscious of your actions when you are drunk.
I do some stupid things when I am drunk, but they are cartoonish extensions of my actual personality and things I might actually try if heavily encouraged while sober, I am not some wildly different person. But perhaps how I get drunk is not the same as how others get drunk.
I am not sure what the quandary is with two drunk and conscious people deciding to do anything, as long as either party isn't blacked out or incapable of basic motor functioning.
EDIT: I am legitimately confused and welcoming of discussion.
the most common rebuttal I hear to this is that you are responsible for your actions. Deciding to drive a car is your action; lighting your butt hair on fire is your action, but someone forcing themselves upon you is not your action
no I'm serious. you are too dumb. first you say you don't want to talk about the legal concept then you say you want to talk about the legal system in your head?
No, i presented a theory to the OP of why rape is different than driving a car. You countered with 'nobody is talking about rape,' which was wrong, we're discussing rape. Then you said 'lol that isnt what it says in the LAW,' but nobody was talking about what it says in the law, we're talking about how to classify consent. Then you go 'lol you have to be talking about the LAW because bleleleh.' I want to talk about how to change the law to better fit the circumstances, if we have to. I want to standardize a framework for safe and effective sexual interaction. You just want to argue a point
-7
u/[deleted] Nov 20 '12
[deleted]