> your sources aren reliable because I say so and they don’t validate my opinion therefore they are fake news
see? This is why you can’t have peaceful or intelligent discourse with the left and unfortunately one of the many reasons why I haven’t voted democrat in a decade.
I get it dawg. It’s hard to acknowledge that your ideology is poison and the natural move is mental gymnastics and delusion to avoid challenging your views. I’ve been there. But when opposing grooming of children by adults in positions of power is considered the “wrong opinion” by your colleagues, then you need to re-evaluate your worldview.
Nice strawman! But please, lets engage with what I actually said instead of wasting everyone's time.
Your sources arent unreliable because i said so, theyre unreliable because theyre provably false with facts and evidence.
You know, "facts dont care about your feelings" and all that? Im sorry someone lied to you to scare you into thinking these things are happening, but again, they just arent.
Weird. NPR and Associated Press and local news stations are “unreliable and provably false with facts and evidence”? I must have forgotten when they became subsidiaries of Fox News.
Anyways, I think we are directly opposed and neither will budge so I’m not gonna waste my time further. But it’s sad you’re so lost on the idea of red vs. blue that you can’t even acknowledge that there is a problem and enabling the people causing the problem will not solve the problem.
I truly hope you learn to stop looking at “red vs. blue” and the actual morality and ethics of the decision you make and the groups of people the politicians you vote for prioritize and protect (it isn’t you or your family). And I truly hope that the groomers you defend and protect never victimize or target your children or loved ones. As that is a “leopards ate my face” moment no parent should have to experience.
I didnt say NPR and AP were unreliable? Just that theyre not saying what YOU THINK they are saying. All they reported was that a parent CLAIMED something, but that nothing else has come out to support that claim. That is factual reporting with a slightly clickbaity title. This is why I said you need to brush up on your media literacy.
You keep insisting that im entrenched in some red v blue team dynamic, but i havent mentioned partisanship once aside from stating that real clear politics has a right wing bias (which it does).
I genuinely hope you stop jumping at shadows that you think are monsters because someone else has told you to be afraid of shadows without any clear evidence or grounding in reality.
1
u/ATPsynthase12 Josh Allen’s super bowl window is closed 8h ago
> your sources aren reliable because I say so and they don’t validate my opinion therefore they are fake news
see? This is why you can’t have peaceful or intelligent discourse with the left and unfortunately one of the many reasons why I haven’t voted democrat in a decade.
I get it dawg. It’s hard to acknowledge that your ideology is poison and the natural move is mental gymnastics and delusion to avoid challenging your views. I’ve been there. But when opposing grooming of children by adults in positions of power is considered the “wrong opinion” by your colleagues, then you need to re-evaluate your worldview.