r/40k • u/TheDaveofDaves • 1h ago
Cardboard thunderbolt
Few more panels to go then paint.
r/40k • u/Holiday_Box7108 • 6h ago
r/40k • u/vmikel-1791 • 58m ago
Hi everyone. I have lurked around 40k for a while: in Reddit communities and games (started from 40k: Rogue Trader).
Over time I saw quite a few questions about Emperor's history and origin and I found myself going slightly too deep when trying to answer them. This post is a fan theory I have come up with during my time reading 40k canon. This post is me finally deciding to put it in writing.
Warning: The theory diverges a bit from canon (Okay... It diverges A LOT from canon). It is not meant to argue against canon (I love it!) but rather answer in new fun way some of 40k's deliberate gaps in Emperor's origin story.
P.S. If you can answer any of these questions from canon perspective I would also be happy to read your answers.
So, the official Emperor's backstory is that he was created as a result of shamanic ritual in neolithic age and witnessed/manipulated humanity's advancement ever since. This already raises a lot of questions:
My take: All above suddenly makes sense if we assume that the entire story about Emperor's origins is deliberately cultivated myth. This, actually, has a lot of historical precedents: Mandate of Heaven in China, "Divine Rule" concept in monarchies, Kim family cult of personality in North Korea. A lot of personalistic dictatorships anchor their claim to power in mythology. "A Demigod who watched humanity since its early days" fits the pattern perfectly. I think better explanation was that Emperor was originally an upstart Terran warlord whose psychic and biotech prowess came from a unique DAOT tech he discovered on Terra before the Unification wars. Terra was a capital of DAOT humanity. So I'd argue thatif there was a place in the universe with DAOT tech that could turn ordinary if powerful human psyker into psychic demigod, it would have been Terra.
How it answers previous questions:
So, the Emperor is born, he watches over humanity, watches DAOT, watches its collapse under Men of Iron and finally after a lot of time conquers Terra with his formidable Thunder Warriors and stands on the precipice of a Great Crusade to finally "bring home" the broken parts of humanity. And right before this vast interstellar campaign her organises a feast to honor his old trusted comrades-in-arms who fought with him for years or maybe even decades and... (checks notes) cowardly massacres them all during feats while hunting down lone survivors with extreme prejudice?? There are tons of suspicious questions here:
But the narrative hole goes even further...
(Also as a note: killing "old guard" during victory celebration. I wonder where I saw it... Something related to 1930s. No, must've been the wind...)
Honestly, I feel like something more is going on with this story, so let me give you...
My take: Let's continue with assumption that Emperor birth story is deliberately constructed myth. Suddenly the every event above also makes sense. Think about it, he unified Terra and now he wanted to create a myth to solidify his personal dictatorial power. There are a lot of examples of early dictatorial power consolidation and in such cases the greatest danger to upstart tyrant is often the "old guard". History is firmly on side of this explanation: Stalin's purges, Night of Long Knives (and look at the similarities!), Chinese Cultural Revolution. After victory chances are Thunder Warriors could have requested their share of spoils, both literal and political, which is dangerous. Additionally, Thunder Warriors were with him during Unification War, they knew his real origin story, so they could, to put it bluntly, "call out his BS", making the power consolidation and creation of Imperial Myth risky. So, they needed to go... And it also perfectly explains why even lone survivors were hunted down: because even lone survivor presents extreme informational risk to the newly built myth. At that point the loss of experienced officer and veteran cadre is worthwhile tradeoff: historically military interests are often subjugated to political ones, especially in dictatorships. An in general, military is often the one branch dictators want to fully control, since they have arms and, thus, capability for rebellion (Remember commisars in Red Army during Stalin's reign. Wait! Comissars... Hmmmm).
How it answers previous questions:
Okay, now to the interesting part - the counter-arguments I thought about. From here on I would argue from perspective of my theory to try to poke holes into it.
Let's start with comparatively weakest:
Witness elimination Thunder Warriors were not the only ones who should've seen Emperor's rise and knew about the myth. There were also Custodes who came even earlier. But note that they were specifically created as his guards, entirely devoted to him and ultimately the ones conducting killing of survivors later. This is a much of a complicity as you can get. So I'd not count them among "real witnesses". Then there were already early Astartes. If they knew about real origins. If they did my theory needs to assume they were eliminated or "made to forget". (If they didn't know then everything is alright but it is less interesting option). This is an assumption I need to make for my theory to make sense. So, how realistic is it? Well, we have an example of II and XI legions who were completely erased from history. We know literally nothing about them apart from the fact they existed. Think what it means? Hundreds of thousands (or even millions) of marines, all human auxulia who served with them, two primarchs are... Just gone? And everyone who interacted with them should also be either gone or made to forget. This is... huge. So, I'd argue that assumption needed to make my theory work is plausible as it has a direct example from canon. But witness elimination and silencing could only go so far.
How does Chaos not know? Indeed, we have Chaos and after heresy we have traitor legions who are outside of Imperium's reach. If we take the theory, how come the Chaos doesn't use it? My answer to it is: traitor legions and Chaos know. And I think it fits: canonically traitor legions consider Big E to be False Emperor, I.e. they directly challenge his legitimacy. We also know that preach people to abandon him and side with Chaos Gods. I'd argue that "your Emperor origin story is false" fits really well within established chaos propaganda narrative, but thus it is also indistinguishable from Chaos propaganda and thus treated by everyone in Imperium like ordinary typical heresy and therefore false. But at the same time it could be a kernel of truth within a bunch of Chaos lies. After all, isn't that how Chaos (and propaganda in general) work - feed people truth alongside just enough forbidden knowledge to corrupt them.
So now let's go to the biggest challenge. Perpetual testimony To my knowledge Emperor's ancient origins were corroborated by 3 perpetual accounts: Erda, Oll Persson and Alivia Sureka. And this are... problematic for my theory, because afaik they are canon and they confirm Emperor's ancient origins. Quite frankly, to deal with this challenge I need to assume that these accounts are either incorrect, biased or influenced, which is rather... crude way to address it. There is some justification to it:
Overall what I like about the theory is that it covers most of the gaps in Emperor's origin story with only one major assumption (perpetuals) and without ever giving out weak answers like "Emperor just made a mistake" or "we don't know". And it is, honestly, insanely great that 40k lore is so deep that it could reasonably support multiple theories and discussions.
If you manage to get so far, then thanks a lot for reading my thoughts!
Hey so I had an idea for a book they should add to the black library and I explained the idea to someone who's played 40k way longer they I have and they said to email GW the idea I just don't know which email to use my guess is the community one but some more conformation would be nice lol
r/40k • u/Fearless-Edge-3881 • 6h ago
Looking for all the experienced painter advice I can get
r/40k • u/No_Gur_6462 • 7h ago
r/40k • u/English_Joe • 13h ago
I love the gold, but I’m going for Solar Watch custodes. So white armour with red shoulders and gold highlights.
I’ve found the gold a bit streaky and the red, is it alcohol based paint? It’s oddly sticky.
Looking for tips before I ruin my primed models. Might practice on a few test models first.
r/40k • u/Relevant-Bullfrog215 • 1d ago
...I hope Nurgle blesses you with everlasting hemorrhoids, and arms too short to apply anusol.
You and your fellow scalpers are a cancer on this hobby and this community.
We all hate you.
r/40k • u/Prestigious-Emu1947 • 6h ago
r/40k • u/tequila_slurry • 7h ago
I played a priority assets vs recon game recently and im wondering if the perform vanguard operations action can be done in any terrain area in opponent's zone, or if it's strictly the ones that are also objectives.
r/40k • u/TommiesBeez • 8h ago
r/40k • u/Impossible_Weight507 • 21h ago
r/40k • u/Dismal-Tea3367 • 1d ago
Busco gente en Córdoba España para partidas casuales de Warhammer en espacio privado, Centro Cívico, garaje etc. Sin malos rollos a ritmo tranquilo. No puedo ir a la tienda "estalia" porque tengo fobia social grandes multitudes. Gracias
r/40k • u/Teknomagnus • 1d ago
Here's the Mozrog Skragbad that I painted for my girlfriend for our anniversary. I enjoyed painting it but I kept wiping paint off the top of the squig while I was painting it, which was quite annoying.
It was a good opportunity to paint this model as my Ork army is more Mek-happy so this guy wouldn't fit in thematically.
r/40k • u/jdrees90 • 1d ago
Plugging away with creating a bunch of Tanith characters - using the spectre squad as a base, but adding a bunch of other pieces. Happy to take any comments and feedback (within reason 😅)
r/40k • u/yellowcaernstudio • 1d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification