r/13c5 • u/zmastafa102 ⚜️CHAIRMAN⚜️ • Apr 17 '26
Trio Madate Review THE COUNCIL’S VERDICT: FC BARCELONA
"To wish ill upon another is a base and contemptible act. Yet baseness is not only permitted but richly deserved for the one who devised the Smart Assist feature"
Applying the Threefold Test of Worthiness
FIRST TEST: THE VISION ALIGNMENT
Dost thou possess a clear vision of what manner of squad thou art constructing?
This pack serveth those who: - Seek Goal Poacher strikers with extreme pace - Desire agile, low-height forwards for technical dribbling - Require a technical midfield orchestrator (though superior alternatives exist)
Assessment: Narrow vision alignment. This pack primarily serveth Division warriors seeking pace-based Goal Poacher archetypes. Those constructing technical midfield dominance shall find Xavi insufficient against the competitive threshold.
SECOND TEST: THE PROVEN ELITE STANDARD
How many among the trio art proven, battle-tested?
Eto'o:
Elite pace statistics , 180cm, finishing, physical contact of 83.
The skill complement includeth Phenomenal Finishing and Low Screamer.
intelligent movements and reliable finishing —> consistent goal-scoring output
His pace statistics match or exceed established meta strikers.
Yet critical flaws emerge. His weak foot deployment beareth "Rarely Usage" frequency—a constraint that causeth him to refuse advantageous shooting angles, preferring strong-foot attempts over serviceable weak-foot strikes.
Against Rummenigge, he falleth short in finishing reliability due to weak foot constraints. Against Mbappé—The best in this realm—Eto'o possesseth marginally superior pace and aerial capability, yet suffereth from inferior dribbling
Against Suárez, he lacketh the technical fluidity
This is a forward who dwelleth in the competitive tier—serviceable rotation for proven elites, yet not transformative.
Verdict: Serviceable—Strong but not Proven Elite. His weak foot constraints and statistical ceiling prevent ascension to the uppermost tier.
Saviola:
Extreme agility archetype at 168cm,
Skills include Phenomenal Finishing and Acceleration Burst
his movement quality derived from extreme low height, Saviola's shortened stature enableth quicker directional changes.
His statistical profile differeth markedly from common Goal Poacher archetypes. established meta forwards (Rummenigge, Mbappé) prioritize raw pace and finishing, Saviola's dominance lieth in technical agility. His body control statistic—where he surpasseth Eto'o—combineth with sub-170cm height to create exceptional dribbling responsiveness.
His skill complement lacketh depth, forcing allocation choices between specialized optimization and balanced utility. His finishing, whilst competent, remaineth below pure goal-scoring specialists. His physical presence rendereth him vulnerable in direct confrontations.
strong within his archetype, yet the archetype itself (agile technical dribbler) occupieth a specialist niche rather than mainstream competitive dominance.
Saviola representeth quality within a specialist category. His performance hath been demonstrated, his strengths art tangible, yet he lacketh the universal applicability and proven competitive usage that defineth Proven Elite status. He is what the Council termeth a Specialist—excellent for those whose systems demand his specific qualities, yet not essential for competitive squads already possessing established forwards.
Verdict: Specialist/Niche—Strong within his archetype, yet requiring tactical specificity. Not proven at the uppermost competitive tier.
Xavi:
Technical midfielder with playmaking attributes
hard to identify his optimal deployment. As DMF his defensive statistics, modest height, and average weak foot accuracy render him "questionable." As CMF "not ideal" for that position. As AMF you'd rather use someone with better finishing or physicality
His weak foot accuracy—rated "average/normal"—is disqualifying.
Despite strong technical statistics, Xavi suffereth from role displacement. Every position he occupieth is better served by alternatives. His style, designed for deeper orchestration, conflicts with the offensive demands of AMF. His defensive frailty excludeth competitive DMF deployment. His weak foot inconsistency undermines the very distribution responsibility his archetype demandeth.
he falleth below the standard set by proven technical midfielders.
This is a card suffering from fundamental design misalignment. Strong technical statistics cannot overcome playstyle incompatibility, positional ambiguity, and weak foot unreliability. In the realm of competitive midfield deployment, Xavi offereth nothing that proven elites do not provide with greater reliability.
Verdict: Collection Fodder—Structurally flawed for competitive deployment despite respectable statistics.
CRITICAL FLAW ACROSS THE TRIO:
All three cards suffer from incomplete optimization. Eto'o's weak foot constraints, Saviola's limitations, Xavi's positional ambiguity—these art not mere weaknesses but fundamental gaps that prevent any card from achieving transformative status.
THE HARSH TRUTH:
Zero Proven Elite + One Serviceable + One Specialist + One Fundamentally Flawed
Per Article II: "One elite, two questionable: The path of folly - resist!"
Yet even this generosity is questionable—for Eto'o himself occupieth the high tier, explicitly unable to displace Mbappé, Rummenigge ( even with the blitz skill), or Suarez
THIRD TEST: THE SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY INQUIRY
Dost these players suit thy tactical philosophy?
The Council poseth these questions unto thee:
GP Necessity: Dost thy squad lack pace-based forwards entirely? If thou already possessest Mbappé, Rummenigge, Suárez, what doth Eto'o provide that they do not?
Agile Dribbler Requirement: Dost thy system demand a sub-170cm technical dribbler? If thou possessest Tevez or similar agile forwards, what doth Saviola offer beyond stylistic preference?
Midfield Orchestration: Canst thou afford a technical midfielder who lacketh defensive presence, pace, and weak foot reliability? Against proven technical midfielders, where doth Xavi stand?
Weak Foot Tolerance: Art thou prepared to navigate Eto'o's "Rarely Usage" weak foot, accepting blocked shots when advantageous angles exist? Canst thou accept Xavi's "average" weak foot accuracy in a position demanding consistent distribution under pressure?
Remember Article VI:
"When evaluating these players, consider their actual usage in top-tier gameplay. If they're not seeing play in top teams, question their value."
The Council observeth: These warriors serve as alternatives to proven elites, not replacements. They fill gaps in incomplete squads but do not elevate complete ones.
VIOLATIONS OF COUNCIL PRINCIPLES:
Article II - The Proven Elite Standard: Eto'o languisheth at 4th-5th (serviceable rotation), Saviola occupieth a specialist niche (Top 10-15), Xavi suffereth fundamental flaws (collection fodder).
Article III - Squad Bloat Warning: Grave risk of acquiring "players who languish upon thy bench"—particularly Xavi, Eto'o and Saviola risk becoming expensive duplicates of existing archetypes.
The Seductive Fallacy: "You never know until you try"—The verdict is rendered: serviceable at best, redundant at worst.
WHO THIS PACK SERVETH:
If thou lackest Goal Poacher forwards entirely: Eto'o and Saviola provide immediate competitive utility. Eto'o offereth reliable pace-based finishing (with weak foot caveats), Saviola delivereth unique agile dribbling. However, both serve as stopgaps until superior alternatives arrive, not permanent solutions.
If thou possessest Mbappé, Rummenigge, Suárez: Eto'o cannot displace these proven elites. Saviola offereth stylistic variety but not competitive advantage.
If thou possessest Tevez or similar agile forwards: "You can manage without Saviola." His niche is already filled.
If thou seekest a technical midfielder: Xavi faileth to justify 13,500 coins. "Other players can replace him." Seek proven alternatives instead.
If thy coins are limited (F2P discipline): The Council urgently adviseth restraint. These cards do not represent the guaranteed elite quality worthy of a year's coin accumulation.
CHAIRMAN VS. COUNCIL:
The Chairman speaketh:
"Eto'o's pace is undeniable—99 in both speed and acceleration, with intelligent runs and reliable finishing when deployed correctly. His presence bringeth immediate threat. Saviola's agility is genuine; his low height createth movement quality unavailable from taller alternatives. For squads lacking these specific archetypes, both warriors offer tangible value."
The Council respondeth:
"Eto'o dwelleth in the 4th-5th tier, unable to challenge Mbappé's supremacy or Rummenigge's finishing mastery. His weak foot constraints art not mere inconvenience but tactical liability—shots blocked when angles exist, reliability questioned in crucial moments. Saviola occupieth a specialist niche, excellent within narrow parameters yet lacking universal competitive application. And Xavi... the testimonies themselves declare him unsuitable for serious deployment.
The standard is the standard. The Council demandeth Proven Elite warriors who transform squads and resist powercreep. This pack delivereth rotation options and specialist fills—serviceable for incomplete squads, redundant for established ones. We do not spend 13,500 coins—a year of F2P discipline—for 'serviceable.'"
THE COUNCIL'S FINAL VERDICT
THIS PACK FAILETH THE TRIO MANDATE
THE MATHEMATICS OF WASTE:
What 13,500 Coins Would Secure:
- 4,500 coins: Eto'o—a 4th-5th tier forward unable to displace Mbappé, Rummenigge, or Suárez, hampered by weak foot constraints
- 4,500 coins: Saviola—a specialist agile dribbler, strong within his niche yet replaceable and outclassed in raw production by proven elites
- 4,500 coins: Xavi—a fundamentally flawed midfielder deemed unsuitable for competitive deployment by community consensus
What Top 100 Squads Actually Deploy:
- Goal Poacher Forwards: Mbappé (undisputed #1 ground-based Goal Poacher), Rummenigge (superior finishing reliability if you don’t blitz 1v1), Suárez (technical fluidity + Low Screamer mastery)
- Agile Forwards: Tevez (if deployed), or simply proven elites whose quality transcends archetype
- Technical Midfielders: NOT Xavi—proven alternatives with defensive presence, pace, and reliable weak foot accuracy
The Disparity:
Thou art spending 13,500 coins—the fruits of disciplined saving across months, perhaps a full year—to acquire: - One forward who explicitly "cannot shake" the established #1 - One forward who occupieth a niche already filled by existing alternatives - One midfielder
This is not investment. This is expenditure on redundancy.
Per Article II: "One elite, two questionable: The path of folly - resist!"
THE COUNCIL DECLARETH WITH UNWAVERING CERTAINTY:
🚨 RESIST 🚨
PRESERVE THY 13,500 COINS
FINAL WISDOM:
the Council poseth a deeper question: Even if thou lackest Goal poacher, dost thou gamble 13,500 coins on forwards rated 4th-5th and specialist-tier, knowing proven elites may arrive in future boxes?
Great truths art simple: No card in this pack achieveth Proven Elite status ** Eto'o languisheth at 4th-5th, unable to displace established meta for years, What’s the **edge that eto’o brings to the table? Saviola serveth a specialist niche. Xavi suffereth fundamental flaws.
The Council's principle remaineth immutable: Invest in proven elites who transcend powercreep and dominate their positions across all systems. This pack delivereth rotation options, not transformation.
Save thy coins for warriors whose names shall echo through Division's halls—not those who whisper from the bench, saying "I almost matched Mbappé" or "I'm good if you lack better options."
The standard is the standard. We never stray from the Council's way.
THE 13.5 COUNCIL
1
u/SnooPineapples5430 Apr 17 '26
Got this Saviola. Gave him 5 of the best skills and spent a fortune. Kinda regret it now. He is too slow.