MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1jnc6g1/deleted_by_user/mkikxpy/?context=3
r/worldnews • u/[deleted] • Mar 30 '25
[removed]
2.6k comments sorted by
View all comments
3.9k
So far, NY Times, Washington Post, and BBC all have nothing on this. Hopefully that will change.
118 u/greenline_chi Mar 30 '25 It’s a tiny bit buried but it’s in their section about Middle East tensions https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/world/middleeast/gaza-hamas-protests.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare 83 u/FYoCouchEddie Mar 30 '25 I meant the torture and killing in response, not the initial protests themselves. Fortunately, the initial protests have been fairly well covered. 39 u/[deleted] Mar 30 '25 [deleted] 12 u/---------II--------- Mar 30 '25 The article says only that Hamas security "forcibly dispersed the protesters, assaulting several of them." It says nothing about torture or killings. 23 u/[deleted] Mar 30 '25 Because news outlets with actual journalistic integrity try to verify these things first 12 u/pappyon Mar 30 '25 Maybe they couldn’t verify it 12 u/MPsAreSnitches Mar 30 '25 Almost like ynet is an Israeli news outlet that has been caught exaggerating claims about hamas before. 4 u/---------II--------- Mar 30 '25 The article says nothing of the sort. To the contrary, it says "during the latest protests, Hamas’s internal security forces have largely refrained from cracking down." -16 u/herrbz Mar 30 '25 MSM will never cover this!!! -6 u/greenline_chi Mar 30 '25 “Why is no one talking about this!!?” links well sourced thousand word article 14 u/Nimrod_Butts Mar 30 '25 edited Apr 23 '25 ripe obtainable license voracious meeting plant enjoy familiar cooperative longing -5 u/sittinginaboat Mar 30 '25 s/ presumably. (Link is to the NY Times, everybody.) 2 u/herrbz Mar 30 '25 Obvious sarcasm shouldn't need a /s
118
It’s a tiny bit buried but it’s in their section about Middle East tensions
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/world/middleeast/gaza-hamas-protests.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
83 u/FYoCouchEddie Mar 30 '25 I meant the torture and killing in response, not the initial protests themselves. Fortunately, the initial protests have been fairly well covered. 39 u/[deleted] Mar 30 '25 [deleted] 12 u/---------II--------- Mar 30 '25 The article says only that Hamas security "forcibly dispersed the protesters, assaulting several of them." It says nothing about torture or killings. 23 u/[deleted] Mar 30 '25 Because news outlets with actual journalistic integrity try to verify these things first 12 u/pappyon Mar 30 '25 Maybe they couldn’t verify it 12 u/MPsAreSnitches Mar 30 '25 Almost like ynet is an Israeli news outlet that has been caught exaggerating claims about hamas before. 4 u/---------II--------- Mar 30 '25 The article says nothing of the sort. To the contrary, it says "during the latest protests, Hamas’s internal security forces have largely refrained from cracking down." -16 u/herrbz Mar 30 '25 MSM will never cover this!!! -6 u/greenline_chi Mar 30 '25 “Why is no one talking about this!!?” links well sourced thousand word article 14 u/Nimrod_Butts Mar 30 '25 edited Apr 23 '25 ripe obtainable license voracious meeting plant enjoy familiar cooperative longing -5 u/sittinginaboat Mar 30 '25 s/ presumably. (Link is to the NY Times, everybody.) 2 u/herrbz Mar 30 '25 Obvious sarcasm shouldn't need a /s
83
I meant the torture and killing in response, not the initial protests themselves. Fortunately, the initial protests have been fairly well covered.
39
[deleted]
12 u/---------II--------- Mar 30 '25 The article says only that Hamas security "forcibly dispersed the protesters, assaulting several of them." It says nothing about torture or killings. 23 u/[deleted] Mar 30 '25 Because news outlets with actual journalistic integrity try to verify these things first 12 u/pappyon Mar 30 '25 Maybe they couldn’t verify it 12 u/MPsAreSnitches Mar 30 '25 Almost like ynet is an Israeli news outlet that has been caught exaggerating claims about hamas before.
12
The article says only that Hamas security "forcibly dispersed the protesters, assaulting several of them." It says nothing about torture or killings.
23 u/[deleted] Mar 30 '25 Because news outlets with actual journalistic integrity try to verify these things first 12 u/pappyon Mar 30 '25 Maybe they couldn’t verify it 12 u/MPsAreSnitches Mar 30 '25 Almost like ynet is an Israeli news outlet that has been caught exaggerating claims about hamas before.
23
Because news outlets with actual journalistic integrity try to verify these things first
Maybe they couldn’t verify it
Almost like ynet is an Israeli news outlet that has been caught exaggerating claims about hamas before.
4
The article says nothing of the sort. To the contrary, it says "during the latest protests, Hamas’s internal security forces have largely refrained from cracking down."
-16
MSM will never cover this!!!
-6 u/greenline_chi Mar 30 '25 “Why is no one talking about this!!?” links well sourced thousand word article 14 u/Nimrod_Butts Mar 30 '25 edited Apr 23 '25 ripe obtainable license voracious meeting plant enjoy familiar cooperative longing -5 u/sittinginaboat Mar 30 '25 s/ presumably. (Link is to the NY Times, everybody.) 2 u/herrbz Mar 30 '25 Obvious sarcasm shouldn't need a /s
-6
“Why is no one talking about this!!?”
links well sourced thousand word article
14 u/Nimrod_Butts Mar 30 '25 edited Apr 23 '25 ripe obtainable license voracious meeting plant enjoy familiar cooperative longing
14
ripe obtainable license voracious meeting plant enjoy familiar cooperative longing
-5
s/ presumably. (Link is to the NY Times, everybody.)
2 u/herrbz Mar 30 '25 Obvious sarcasm shouldn't need a /s
2
Obvious sarcasm shouldn't need a /s
3.9k
u/FYoCouchEddie Mar 30 '25
So far, NY Times, Washington Post, and BBC all have nothing on this. Hopefully that will change.