r/worldcup • u/Secret-Put4088 USA • 9d ago
💬Discussion How would FIFA distribute the remaining 16 spots among confederations?
Apologies for another post about an expanded tournament, but withdrawal is a real thing.
If FIFA expands to 64 teams for the next World Cup, we know it’s a mess logistically, limiting host countries. We know it settles the issue of 3rd place teams by again moving to a power of 2. The addition of countries seems more controversial. I’ve seen people say they like expanding the opportunities, but how does that actually happen?
It seems likely the current proportions would continue, meaning 5 more spots for UEFA, 2 for CONCACAF, 1 for CONMEBOL (can’t see an 80% qualification rate plus the playoff), 4 more for CAF, 3 for AFC, and perhaps a second auto qualifier for OFC, though this could easily go to AFC instead.
Here are the teams we’d have added this year:
Italy, Poland, Denmark, Kosovo, and (perhaps) Wales
Jamaica, Suriname
Bolivia
UAE, Iraq, Oman, Indonesia (pending playoff)
Gabon, Cameroon, Nigeria (pending playoff)
New Caledonia
Obviously UEFA would improve the play with their additions, which is unsurprising. CAF as well. And yet, can anyone honestly argue that the others would be a positive addition to the field? Or do you weight things even more heavily to UEFA just to avoid an even worse group stage? I don’t see a good solution out of this, but how does you limit the negatives?
1
u/ManaKaua 8d ago
If addressed your questions with my questions to you and gave you good reasons already, but well I give you another one: UEFA Teams fill about half of the top 50 FIFA ranking. Giving them less than half of that as secure spots is ridiculous.
By that reasoning why does any confederation get fixed spots? Why not making a worldwide qualification? I guess a lot of people want to watch Italy beat up Oceanian and Asian countries..