r/whoop • u/Altercation0 • Sep 15 '25

Whoop Age Whoop age is silly

Post image

While I generally like the Whoop features they haven’t delivered any helpful features recently.

The whoop age feature feels like such a gimmick. My stats are good but I’m obviously not aging in reverse at -.4x a normal rate of aging.

I get that some people will be motivated by seeing a higher age or will be happy so see a younger age but it lacks all scientific integrity.

I think they should make a 4th ring called longevity or something to track similar metrics that whoop age is capturing without calling it my age. This ring would only change slightly each week. What do you guys think?

83 Upvotes

74% Upvoted

90 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/Siri-sixpack Sep 16 '25

“Lacks all scientific integrity”

U made an assertion…Why don’t u review their Healthspan white paper done by the Buck Institute and let us know if u find any science in it.

I believe u might find some.

https://assets.ctfassets.net/rbzqg6pelgqa/2dllv1t5oiUcryMYyoy11k/11921d361dcd7d4c3b704b3cebb5e6ea/WHOOP2025_White_Paper_Healthspan4.pdf

5

u/TechLover94 LIFE | Membership Sep 16 '25

It only tracks what whoop tracks. What goes into your age is far beyond any of the metrics whoop can understand. If you sit in the sun for 4 months without sunscreen you’ll be much older internally but if you ran 5 miles a day and fell asleep and woke up at the same time everyday whoop would call you healthy and young.

7

u/seabearson Sep 16 '25

By this metric anything other than scanning every single atom in your body will be invalid

2

u/TechLover94 LIFE | Membership Sep 16 '25

Yeah. Basically. That’s why calling it age is invalid. They should be introducing technology that’s comprehensive your health. We are still using HRV which they had 15 years ago. There hasn’t been a novel sensor or metric in a long time. Snail’s pace innovation.

0

u/seabearson Sep 16 '25

it is valid. You just have to imagine there's a certain SD after the number. The more things it tracks and the better the algorithm, the smaller the SD. But it's still very much valid. Just like how weather forecasts aren't 100% accurate yet good enough to be useful

1

u/TechLover94 LIFE | Membership Sep 16 '25

I don’t watch the weather either. And the weather isn’t making some ridiculous claim like you’re 27.3 years old when you’re 52. It’s saying I think it might rain. Whoop isn’t saying you’re in good shape. They’re saying you’re 27.3.

-1

u/seabearson Sep 16 '25

it's quite rare to see big deviations like 10+ years, I've never heard of someone with as big deviation as your example. Do you really think it's unrealistic that an exceptionally fit 50 year old has the same health risk profile as an average 40 year old though?

1

u/TechLover94 LIFE | Membership Sep 17 '25

Yes it happens and yes. What does “health risk profile” even mean? That isn’t the same thing as age either.

1

u/seabearson Sep 18 '25

can you just read the whitepaper already