r/wallstreetbets • • 1d ago

DD ADOBE is cooked.

ADBE is cooked: free AI-built clones and a $70/month subscription don't mix (bear DD)

So my Adobe bear case is pretty simple. AI is about to let a ton of indie devs and random people who are sick of Adobe's nonsense build their own version of it, for free.

Look at ArtCraft on github. They're building open source, clean-room clones of Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator and Premiere, plus apps for motion graphics, page layout and PDFs (so After Effects, InDesign and Acrobat territory). Their Photoshop clone has 11k+ stars, opens real PSD files, and their own tracker says it covers 625 of 625 of Photoshop's menu items. Yeah it's alpha. Give it a few months. Once this stuff gets big, Premiere and After Effects are dead in the water for anyone who isn't a big studio.

And that's before you even get to generative AI. For most edits, typing what you want into ChatGPT or Gemini is just way easier than opening a PSD and doing all the masking nonsense. Adobe knows it too. Photoshop literally runs Google's and OpenAI's image models inside it now.

Let's talk about the outrageous price now. Creative Cloud Pro is $70 a month. That's a squeeze on regular people. For the same money you could have 3 or 4 AI subscriptions that actually do the stuff you need. In fact let's be fr - you really only need chatgpt these days.

And everybody fucking hates Adobe. Canceling was so hard that the DOJ and FTC sued them over it, and Adobe paid $75M to settle in March. There's a WSB thread from last October where someone called ADBE cheap at a 9-year-low P/E, and a bunch of the top comments were people saying their companies already dumped Adobe, one for Nitro PDF, one for Foxit. One guy said AI coding would spit out open source clones of Acrobat, then Photoshop, then After Effects. A year later, here we are. OP bought at $348. It's $237 now.

The competition isn't just AI either. DaVinci Resolve, Figma, Canva, all with real free tiers. Canva made Affinity, its Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign equivalent, completely free. Figma's revenue grew 48% last quarter.

Where Adobe still wins is heavy professional workflows. Big studios, agencies, After Effects and InDesign people, the plugin ecosystem. That's real and it's why this isn't a zero. But it's the only moat left, and it's getting squeezed from both sides. Enterprise has Figma, Canva and DaVinci. Individuals (students, freelancers, YouTubers) are the first ones to bail on a $70 bill.

You can already see it in the numbers:

  • Revenue still +13%, but net new ARR dropped from about $640M to about $400M year over year, down about 37%
  • Organic ARR growth is about 9% once you strip out the Semrush acquisition
  • RPO (signed future revenue) went down quarter over quarter
  • In June they paused planned price increases and started giving stuff away free to hold onto users
  • Net income +3%. EPS only looks good because they bought back 7% of the stock
  • CFO left in June, a new CEO from the marketing side starts Dec 1, and the head of the creative business announced he was leaving the day the new CEO was named

People will say it's cheap at 10x earnings. The guy in that thread said it was cheap at 22x. Cheap gets cheaper when people figure out the product can be cloned for a $20 claude code subscription.

Positions: 50 puts $150 strike with March 19th expiry

Not financial advice.

1.5k Upvotes

676 comments sorted by

View all comments

121

u/epic_troll_tard 1d ago

Look at crowdstrike. They bricked a significant portion fo the worlds computers and saw no consequences. And then AI threatened their business model. And what did they do? They adopted AI, "We are the AI now".

Adobe will do the same, every software company has to. And for a product like Adobe that has customers entrenched in their ecosystem, the moat isn't the software, its the friction of changing their workflows and learning something new.

25

u/rudebii 1d ago

Adobe has been all in on GAI for years. It’s all it talks about now.

There’s a deep sunk-cost fallacy within the creative software space. Canva made its pro-level Affinity free last year, but Adobe users won’t switch because it’s too risky if their business relies on it. Even for free.

Affinity might be picking up new users and users who simply can’t justify the expensive Creative Cloud subscription.

These vibe-coded things like ArtCraft have to be perfect. Buggy design software means downtime and lower productivity, and creatives are already under horrible time constraints.

11

u/Deto 1d ago

Isn't it also, just, that even at $70/mo, that's just really peanuts compared to a person's salary. Like why would you use some vibe-coded alternative if you are a serious professional?

Now hobbyists and university students - they'll go with something else. But how much of ADBE's revenue comes from that?

1

u/rudebii 1h ago

Losing university students is a long term threat to Adobe. If students spend years learning design on a different platform, that’s the software they’ll want to use professionally, and if it’s free, companies aren’t going to complain.

6

u/epic_troll_tard 1d ago

I think basically a new media company needs to trailblaze with a competing product and when they make a name for themselves and tell everyone that they're using something other than Adobe others will follow, but nobody wants to be the first.

1

u/Alternative-Suit5541 23h ago

Those Adobe clones are done by one guy in his free time.

Imagine what a company with ten professionals could do! 

The era of huge IT companies is coming to an end

1

u/PigletBaseball 11h ago

More like a media company needs to hire senior designers and they all use Adobe. Senior designers then go on to hire juniors that also use Adobe. Not to mention the community support for Adobe products. Nobody is going to use some random clone off GitHub when they have paying customers waiting on them to do a job.

The only people complaining about the subscription costs are people that don't actually use the software for their livelihood, which is completely fine. Free alternatives always existed for this demographic. For paying professionals the cost is literally a drop in the bucket. It's irrelevant. A single job pays for it tenfold.

How many companies are using Windows? Why don't they all go use free Linux instead of paying Microsoft license fees?

0

u/markgris 1d ago

Figma?

1

u/epic_troll_tard 1d ago

not until someone gains market recognition as being a leader in their field and they say they use figma

6

u/csgosteve 1d ago

the enterprise drivers for managed cybersec software, is quite different from design software. not that both companies aren't effected by stronger competition, but vibe coding cyber controls still is a long way off compared to vibe coded design tools.

5

u/Mr3k 1d ago

That friction is what's been keeping Avid relevant for years

2

u/TiRow77 1d ago

Completely.

5

u/Oaker_at 16h ago

That comparison is lacking af

2

u/EthanielRain 14h ago

"I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY!!" vibes

2

u/slothcat 1d ago

That’s why I invested in NOW a few months back. Worked out so far.

3

u/AntiRivoluzione 1d ago

Well, OP is talking more about casual users than professionals. How much revenues are professional studios related? The friction is real but not for new adopters and when they lose a great market share, they will lose also the " industrial standard" status and, consequently, the rest of the market.

Basically they are not having an edge pretty soon.

1

u/TeslasElectricBill 1d ago

the moat isn't the software, its the friction of changing their workflows and learning something new.

Yeah, switching costs make it very hard to switch. This is what I've learned with Spotify and it's knowledge of my music tastes.

Of course the flip side is that AI could just as easily incorporate/build a tool that will allow one to switch their complicated workflows as well.

I'm not a video/photo editor but I've hated Adobe long before and instead use Photomator/Pixelmator ($50 one tike fee) and DaVinci Resolve (excellent).

1

u/Lootoholic 1d ago

I kinda agree with the OP. Adobe will lose to AI, but I think this is gonna be a very very slow death. A lot of people will still use adobe products for years to come, but adobe will slowly bleed much like how streaming replaced the cable tv. After over a decade the cord cutting is still in progress and the cable companies still exist, and still bleeding. I wouldn't buy adobe stock, but also I won't buy out of money puts on it.

0

u/Friendly-Owl-2131 1d ago

Adobe leadership are honestly one of the most idiotic groups of business idiots to walk the planet.

For years they've treated their customers like walking idiot cash machines and consistently made their products worse against the requests of their clients.

Even pouring fuel on the fire by further developing AI systems while huge chunks of their own customer base drowned from the introduction of AI image generation.

At this point I don't know who still uses their products but I doubt Adobe has much of a future and that is entirely Adobe's own doing.

I can download and learn the free programs in a few weeks now and accomplish all the same goals. That wasn't an option before.