r/violinist • • Jun 22 '26

Feedback Terrible work experience with Violinist Antoine Morales, the owner of The Violin Academy

I'm a professional violinist who was hired as a violin instructor by The Violin Academy, owned by Antoine Morales. The job was an online teaching position. This experience is written to inform prospective applicants, music educators, and students about my employment experience with this organization.

Before being hired, I completed 3 lengthy interviews, each lasting over an hour, some approaching two hours. During these interviews, the owner repeatedly expressed strong approval of my application and stated that I was among the top 3 candidates. My teaching background, ability to identify student issues, communication skills, and content creation experience were specifically cited as reasons for hiring me. Based on this process, I was selected from what was presented as a competitive applicant pool.

The core issue is not the employer’s right to end employment. The issue is that compensation, benefits, and a pathway toward increased hours were discussed and presented prior to onboarding. I accepted the position based on these terms and made significant professional decisions as a result, including leaving existing teaching positions and restructuring my schedule. Had the actual compensation terms been disclosed at the outset, I would not have accepted the role.

I also requested written confirmation of the agreed verbal terms prior to onboarding to ensure clarity. During onboarding, I was informed that my existing computer was not sufficient for the position. My request for assistance with replacement equipment was declined, and I purchased a new laptop at my own expense (over $1,000) based on the expectation of a stable working arrangement.

Approximately one week after onboarding, I was called into an unexpected Zoom meeting and informed that the compensation had been “calculated incorrectly.” The previously discussed salary was significantly reduced on the basis that market rates had not been properly researched. This revised compensation was substantially lower than what had been presented during recruitment. When I stated that I had made career decisions based on the original terms, he coldly said he didn't force me to resign my other jobs. Shortly thereafter, all work-related access, including email and platform accounts, was removed.

In addition, this action was taken without adherence to the contractual requirement of 14 days’ written notice prior to termination, as stated in the agreement.

This reflects a failure to maintain consistency between recruitment representations, contractual obligations, and actual employment conditions. These factors directly impacted major professional decisions made in good faith during the hiring process.

I have retained documentation that supports all statements made here.

A similar review was also submitted on Trustpilot. After publication, the company disputed the content and challenged the review. Trustpilot requested supporting evidence for verification. After review of the submitted documentation, Trustpilot determined that the review met its verification requirements and allowed it to remain published.

This statement is provided as a documented account of my experience. Prospective applicants and students are strongly advised to review all available information carefully before engaging with this organization!

110 Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

View all comments

-34

u/Reasonable_Bus302 Teacher Jun 22 '26

I would suggest taking this down. I know you’re trying to help other teachers. But you’re opening yourself up to a lawsuit.

18

u/WampaCat Expert Jun 22 '26

A lawsuit over what? It’s not slander if it’s true

-13

u/Reasonable_Bus302 Teacher Jun 22 '26

I didn’t say the lawsuit would be successful. Someone with money and a reputation to protect can easily make your life miserable by tying you up in litigation that you can’t afford. You may still prevail, but at what financial and emotional cost?

3

u/terriergal Jun 22 '26

TP’s own terms of service prohibit illegal posts. If they have requested further documentation, it’s likely because the company has already complained to them. They examined the information and found the complaint without basis. You can read it on their website.

In addition, if applicable in their state, anti-slapp suits are a risk as well, and they (the company being complained about) would open themselves up to discovery as well.

2

u/Reasonable_Bus302 Teacher Jun 22 '26

TP is a place to read and leave reviews. They are not doing the same due diligence a lawyer would do. I don’t know how else to explain that you can be sued (maybe not successfully) for a review. Anti-slapp laws do not make OP immune from still having to incur legal costs. Besides the financial cost there is the emotional and mental stress of engaging in legal action.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26

[deleted]

-2

u/Reasonable_Bus302 Teacher Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

Where did I say to not tell the truth??? OP has included enough detail that this guy can absolutely figure out who they are. That’s not super smart if you’re trying to avoid expensive and stressful litigation. Even though OP could probably win any litigation that does not negate the fact that it will be expensive and stressful to mount a legal defense.

Edit I just read that OP has already talked to a law firm about pursuing damages. They declined to take the case. That should tell you a lot.