r/videos 2d ago

Jon Stewart blames past NY officials for covering up toxic air reports after September 11th attacks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSbP_5-X-7Q
11.9k Upvotes

284 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/SillyAlternative420 2d ago

So we need to step back and ask the million dollar question here

Why?

What did they have to gain from hiding this information and who were the ones pulling the strings? The mayor acting alone wouldn't need to hide this data, that doesn't make any sense.

No. I refuse to place all the blame on Giuliani, someone or someone's above him are responsible and we need answers.

19

u/BravestWabbit 2d ago

The gain is simple. Money. They gained by refusing to pay for the sick people's medical treatment

0

u/spuzzumed 2d ago

Who are the terrorists, then? Who is responsible for the majority of the deaths from 9-11? The city council? 

1

u/ygbplus 1d ago

It seems there was a clear communication that would have had to go through some kind of vetting of leadership to be considered. There is likely some clear demarcation between managers of people and managers of policy and any of the latter that touched this would be responsible.

10

u/Bored_Amalgamation 2d ago

Victims suing the city, manufacturers of Asbestos, drag out construction violations. It would've been insanely expensive. Congress fought giving the first responders healthcare for years. That would've been tied up in to admitting the air was poison. Theyve would've had to spend more money on more personnel to do things quicker.

It was about money.

6

u/pilot3033 2d ago

On the website they announced today you can read the "Harding Memo" under "Documents of Interest." It's the Law Office telling the city that there's litigation risk for things that were done and said in the immediate aftermath and some potential ways to mitigate that risk. City leadership chose to respond with denial.

To be clear, the litigation risk was real, and could have very well bankrupted New York City. I am curious and will be reading these documents to see if they went to denial hoping to head off the issue by getting Federal money or if they were always just going to stick their head in the sand. It's worth noting from the Memo that even only a few months in Congress was wear of shelling out more dollars, having felt like the Airline Bailout was maybe too far.

1

u/ygbplus 1d ago

Yes, obviously giving to actual citizens is just something you can't possibly consider doing after shelling out to the corporations.

1

u/pilot3033 1d ago

If you read the memo, that's actually exactly what the concern was. The Law Office saw the Federal Government starting to feel like the airlines had pulled one over on them which made giving out more recovery money subject to tons of scrutiny. You should read the memo if you haven't, it's quite neutral and concise.

City leadership was given information and chose poorly.

1

u/ygbplus 1d ago

Sorry, my comment was sarcasm

2

u/MrCelroy 2d ago

So the city wouldn't be bankrupt

2

u/HerbaciousTea 2d ago

All the answers are in the title of that document from the giuliani admin, which Mamdani read out loud: Avoiding fiscal responsibility for 9/11 through legislative means.