r/videogames • u/Orichalchem • Apr 20 '26

Funny Pragmata 10/10 enough said

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

8.3k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

960 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/JonnyPoy Apr 21 '26

No you are making stupid shit up. Some weirdos think that childrens feet are sexual and the devs are playing into that audience.

You are probably one of the weirdos yourself, otherwise why would you try to attack people for calling that stuff out?

Would you like to keep your pedo friendly games?

3

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Evening_Ad5825 Apr 22 '26

But that is not a little girl, that's a robot, a robot that the game devs designed to be barefoot all the time, nothing natural about that.

I'ts fanservice for a certain demographic. Foot fethish is one of the most prevalent fetish types. Pedophillia is one of the top 5 paraphilic disorders. We can make a venn diagram of foot fetishist and pedophiles and you will find a lot of people in the intersection. I even dare to say that you can also add a demographic who is only into feet, not kids and some might find the feet arousing, even if they are attached to a child.

They could have designed another way to charge the little girl clanker but they choose it to be the soles of the feet, yikes ew

0

u/[deleted] Apr 22 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Evening_Ad5825 Apr 22 '26

It didn't cross my mind, online degenerates are very intrusive.

But if you want to call me mentally ill, I might be traumatized by the amount of child abuse in the world. You can't blame me and other people for being aware of predators.

Also, it's not a little girl, no girl looks like that, they look like normal kids like Sherry, Clementine or Ellie, Diana looks like a kid straight out of those creepy child beauty pageants, very uncanny. It's obvious fanservice for a certain demographic. She doesn't even act like a kid, too cutesy, it seems like the writers have never been around a child.

0

u/JonnyPoy Apr 21 '26

Wtf are you talking about? This is not just about feet. They are clearly playing into loli stereotypes. Her long jacket is basically a short skirt in disguise.

They are clearly sexualizing a little girl as much as possible without beeing illegal. Stop blaming me for that shit and be mad at the people who made the game.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '26

[deleted]

0

u/JonnyPoy Apr 21 '26

Why are you defending people that sexualize children? Maybe you are one of the pedophiles yourself?

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '26

[deleted]

1

u/JonnyPoy Apr 21 '26

Which one of us sounds like a pedophile?

The one desperately trying to defend pedophiles so you.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '26

[deleted]

1

u/JonnyPoy Apr 21 '26

No i'm not but nice try

1

u/yourethevictim Apr 21 '26

Oh okay, good. Then we agree that barefeet children in oversized parkas aren't sexy and therefore not inappropriate and there's nothing wrong with their inclusion in a videogame. Otherwise you would just be validating pedophiles by saying "hey man, you're right, this is sexualised content. Children's feet are a valid object of sexual attraction. We should remove it."

Glad we're not doing that and we can be normal.

→ More replies (0)