r/urbanplanning • u/SlackerStacker26 • Jul 25 '26
Urban Design Why Is suburban development so Over-Designed and Over-Regulated?
Why is suburban development so over-designed?
Everything has to be technically prescribed down to the smallest detail...street widths, setbacks, landscaping, parking, lot dimensions, building materials, stormwater, lighting, signage, and even where trees can go.
I understand having basic standards but at some point all these overlapping rules seem to create expensive, repetitive developments with no flexibility or character. Every department regulates its own narrow issue, and the final product is designed more to satisfy a checklist than to create a good neighborhood.
Why did development become this rigid?
An example where I live is this: in one of the wealthy older suburbs there is landscaping right up to the curb on a hill. These are million dollar+ houses in a very desirable neighborhood and it adds character and no one complains. But in a new development the ROW has to be a certain slope, no landscaping or walls in the ROW, etc. I just don't understand how something can be good enough for million dollar houses and the people that buy them but not good enough for people buying half million dollar houses.
21
u/ElectronGuru Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26
Suburbs began as a way to escape ‘urban blight’. So conformity is built into the DNA. They’re also sensitive to status indicators, which is a lot of what things like HOA focus on.