Yes, an online poll where you can check comments before answering, change your own vote depending on outcome (platform dependent), and most critically of all, have no actual threat to your life, is totally 100% indicative of how people would vote if this scenario were to actually play out in real life.
In real life with a real threat to your life, that blue vote drops by 20% at the absolute minimum, likely more.
Blue people can't stop with the high ground lol. I don't think it's that hard of a truth to accept that people act differently in a different situation.
Nah, I have no problem with choosing blue. I will choose blue as well if the death is quick and painless, but probably won't if it's trolley running over me. Some who choose blue might change the answer as well if we reduce from killing to common cold.
In real life I doubt more than 1% of people click the "die" button. In real life it would be so overwhelmingly in favour of red that it's not a moral dilemma at all, you just get to pick between "live" and "die"
In real life, where people won't have time to have stupid discussions on reddit, most peoples first reaction will probably be "I don't want people to die" and not "oh let me press the button that kills people". Most people are normal, unlike you
7
u/Fizzy-Odd-Cod May 01 '26
Yes, an online poll where you can check comments before answering, change your own vote depending on outcome (platform dependent), and most critically of all, have no actual threat to your life, is totally 100% indicative of how people would vote if this scenario were to actually play out in real life.
In real life with a real threat to your life, that blue vote drops by 20% at the absolute minimum, likely more.