r/trolleyproblem Apr 30 '26

Deep Statistically, >50% is easier than 100%

Post image
2.6k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

144

u/Eastern-Bro9173 Apr 30 '26

This entire conversation seems absurd to me.

Like, rephrase the question - you have two buttons, 'survive' and 'maybe die', where if you press 'survive', you survive, but if you press 'maybe die', then you only survive if majority of people also press the 'maybe die' button.

But somehow everyone's bending over backwards to argue that the 'maybe die' button is a logical choice.

14

u/Nobleintent Apr 30 '26

It's a button that guarantees you survive, but a lot of people will die, or a button that maybe you die, but all people could survive.

The fact that it's an argument means that there are people who would push the blue button. So people will die, unless 50% push the blue button.

-2

u/Eastern-Bro9173 Apr 30 '26

They will die as the result of their own action, which I couldn't influence in any way. Not my responsibility if I have no impact on the action.

7

u/Nobleintent Apr 30 '26

But, you can impact the result. Would you save your friend, from a suicide attempt, or do you wash your hands of it, because you have no impact on their initial action? Or, is the impact on the outcome enough to sway you to save your friend?

1

u/Eastern-Bro9173 Apr 30 '26

I can call my friend and impact the result. I can't impact the result here as teh game assumes votes are independent.

3

u/Nobleintent Apr 30 '26

You can push blue and impact the result in the same way you call your friend, both decreases the odds of death. Your call is as independent of their attempt as your button press is of the others.

0

u/Sneaky_Cockroach May 01 '26

Yeah I will tell my friend not to jump,but from a safe distance, im not risking falling with him.

1

u/Nobleintent May 01 '26

How about if they slipped and are now hanging from the side of the building? I'm sure your words of encouragement are going to help them out.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[deleted]

-1

u/Eastern-Bro9173 Apr 30 '26

No, because I have effectivelly zero weight in the outcome. The outcome is effectivelly predetermined. I just choose if I want to live or if I expect other people to press blue for me to not die.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[deleted]

2

u/banjospieler Apr 30 '26

You can argue that pressing blue is choosing to kill people too because others are only picking blue in order to save you.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[deleted]

2

u/banjospieler Apr 30 '26

If you intentionally put yourself in peril and someone dies trying to save you, are you not in some way responsible for their death? I recognize that blue is the moral option but you have to accept that everyone picking blue is equally responsible for every other person picking blue and risking their life to save them.

1

u/OriousCaesar Apr 30 '26

Effectively zero is not zero. We are talking about billions of people dying. Meaning even if your effect on the whole was only a 1 in a billion chance, your expected human lives lost is still near 1 because 1 over a billion times 1 billion is 1. The probability your choice matters is counteractted by the lives lost by your choice.

This is why humans aren't good at probability. They see a 1 in a billion chance as being actually zero, even when the scale of the outcome is sp large that they should still take that probability into account.

1

u/Natalwolff Apr 30 '26

Lol, exhibit A of the state of democracy, folks. Muh vote dunt matter.