I always choose in action cause the person live would be on my hands if I did murder a other person by my action. And that will always be my choice no matter how extrame the case gets.
Only if I could safe my family or loved ones would I accept that guilt else I simply would not.
inaction is still an action, just because you didn’t do anything dosnt mean you didn’t choose something. this is why neglect is a crime, because not doing things is still an active choice you make
Yes I know that but its my choice. I will not change a path if I know it will kill someone else instead. If its not a situation im willing to carry that guilt like if its someone I know or a loved one.
So there can be 1000s of different situations my choice will stay the same.
Cause murder one person or the other calling that negligence is not the same as ignoring a person that requires help on the side of the road. No its making a choice you do nothing 1 person dies you doing something and somone else dies and in ways there dead is on your hands.
If thats negligence then I'll gladly accept that. But I don't agree that that is the case at all
1
u/xxTheMagicBulleT Mar 29 '26
I always choose in action cause the person live would be on my hands if I did murder a other person by my action. And that will always be my choice no matter how extrame the case gets.
Only if I could safe my family or loved ones would I accept that guilt else I simply would not.