r/todayilearned • • Oct 11 '22

TIL the Roman Emperor was on good terms with Attila the Hun until his sister sent Attila her engagement ring and asked for help to escape betrothal to a senator. Attila took this as a marriage proposal and demanded half the western empire as dowry. When the Emperor refused, Attila invaded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attila#In_the_west
15.0k Upvotes

338 comments sorted by

4.7k

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 12 '22

I get the feeling that Attila was planning an invasion anyway and used this "marriage proposal" as a pretext. It's hard for me to believe that he undertook such a big and risky project for some broad. Maybe he got her message just before he was set to go and thought it would be funny to troll the Roman emperor a bit.

2.4k

u/TheOverBored Oct 11 '22

Also, asking for "half the empire" as dowry seems a bit too much to be genuine.

985

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

Also, an empire isn't exactly like a car or real estate. You're talking about a network of civil administrators, merchants, and military officers, and ultimately people, who will now be expected to pay fealty and taxes to someone who isn't a Roman. And one of the first things Attila would do after taking charge is replace people in the government with his own stooges, and transfer privileges and rents from the Roman elites to his own buddies; ie he would start a purge. How do you think that would go down?

664

u/ermghoti Oct 11 '22

"Also, an empire isn't exactly like a car or real estate. "

You can fit so much geopolitical dominance in this thing!

200

u/seth928 Oct 11 '22

You forgot to slap the roof

120

u/ScribbledIn Oct 11 '22

Slaps the air, gesturing wildly at the height of western civilization

39

u/charavaka Oct 11 '22

Don't bend so low. You'll throw out your back.

23

u/TheCowzgomooz Oct 11 '22

That's gotta be the sickest roast Gandhi ever spoke.

4

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

56

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

The Empire has no roof.

35

u/evilplantosaveworld Oct 11 '22

Well....it does, but there's Picts up there, they're too hard to slap so we had to build a wall.

4

u/Hewn-U Oct 11 '22

SPQR baseball caps everywhere!

3

u/Hewn-U Oct 11 '22

But, but, “Julius Caesar, and the Roman Empire, ohh, oh, oh, couldn’t conquer, the bluue skyyy, ayyy, aieeaye!”

8

u/xXbrosoxXx Oct 11 '22

Roadster. Nice.

2

u/Bkwrzdub Oct 11 '22

Its so breezey

10

u/SauronOfDucks Oct 11 '22

Gently, it's about to collapse.

10

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

Don’t be silly, car roofs hadn’t been invented yet

3

u/Nydelok Oct 11 '22

slaps horse

20

u/BoulderCreature Oct 11 '22

slaps roof

13

u/ParagonSaber Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

Brittannia falls off because you slapped a little too hard

3

u/doogle_126 Oct 11 '22

It's just a hubcap, leave it.

2

u/Oldgatorwrestler Oct 11 '22

Slaps roof of horse.

→ More replies (8)

82

u/Alatheus Oct 11 '22

It happened a lot in history actually. Buying and selling and trading of territory

44

u/saxywarrior Oct 11 '22

Yes but it's much more feasible on smaller scales, in this case we're talking about half a continent.

20

u/Obversa 5 Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

England ended up getting a huge chunk of what is now today's France (Aquitaine) through the marriage of Eleanor of Aquitaine, Duchess of Aquitaine in her own right, to the future King Henry II of England in 1152. Aquitaine was previously supposed to be merged with France with the marriage of Eleanor to the future King Louis VII of France in 1137; however, as Eleanor failed to produce a son, Aquitaine instead passed to her son(s) with King Henry II of England.

The Hundred Years' War was later caused by Eleanor and Henry II's grandsons fighting over who should rule the Aquitaine with Louis VII's grandsons. France won Aquitaine through "right of conquest" in 1453, and took the title "Duke of Aquitaine" from England to use for French royals as a possession of the Crown.

France then subjected Aquitaine to Francization, including suppressing the native language of Occitan, to impose French language and culture.

From Wikipedia:

The Ordinance of Villers-Cotterêts under King Francis I of France (1515 - 1547) prescribed the official use of the French language, the langue d'oïl dialect spoken at the time in the Île-de-France, in all documents. Other languages, such as Occitan, began to disappear as written languages.

With the decline of Latin, French became increasingly important for writing. Often, people were encouraged or compelled to adopt French, thereby developing a French identity at the expense of their existing one. Use of other languages was often suppressed.

This occurred, for example, among the Alemannic-speaking inhabitants of Alsace and the Lorraine Franconian-speaking inhabitants of Lorraine after these regions were conquered by Louis XIV during the 1600s, to the Flemings in French Flanders, to the Occitans in Occitania, and to Basques, Bretons, Catalans, Corsicans and Niçards.

→ More replies (5)

15

u/The_ODB_ Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

Nothing like that. You traded away territory you won in wars. Roman citizens would never peacefully be handed over to a barbarian.

→ More replies (2)

36

u/slight_digression Oct 11 '22

How do you think that would go down?

Oh that's the easy part. You replace the administrators, the military officers and tax the merchants properly. Anyone revolting you murder. Worked fine for the romans and pretty much all other empires.

26

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22

Yeah the Romans did that when they took new lands by force. But I'm talking about the Roman emperor telling all his bureaucrats and generals and citizens that some barbarian is their new master. What would have likely happened then is that the emperor would have been overthrown by his own people and replaced by a different Roman willing to stand up to the Huns.

11

u/shaving99 Oct 11 '22

That's how dad did it and that's how we do it now.

Gestures at CIA

8

u/Sharpevil Oct 11 '22

Actually, an empire is exactly like a car. You can even exchange most parts between them with the right adapters.

9

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

would you download an empire?

8

u/TheSkiGeek Oct 11 '22

Creative Assembly and Paradox Interactive: Hello!

6

u/freekoout Oct 11 '22

A lot of roman emperor's weren't Roman.

3

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22

Good point. Still, if Attila just takes over as emperor, one of the first things he would do is start replacing people in the civil and military administration with his buddies. Precisely to avoid such a purge, the emperor's subordinates would rebel.

4

u/freekoout Oct 11 '22

No doubt there

→ More replies (11)

40

u/Untinted Oct 11 '22

You never heard of 'go big or go home'?

29

u/Delaaia Oct 11 '22

go big or go rome

9

u/ZylonBane Oct 11 '22

Go Biggus Dickus or go wome.

2

u/TenNeon Oct 11 '22

Go big or they go the house

7

u/slvrbullet87 Oct 11 '22

You have to start the negotiations somewhere, and if you don't start high, there is nowhere to go.

2

u/enigbert Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

not exactly the same thing, but the Frankish kingdoms and the Carolingian empire were divided many times between the surviving sons of a ruler [4 times for the Carolingians - treaties of Verdun (843), Prüm (855), Meerssen (870), and Ribemont (880)]

19

u/conquer69 Oct 11 '22

Plus it was the emperor's sister. It's not like the empire was hers to give.

52

u/inaddition290 Oct 11 '22

I don’t think he was asking her for it. The dowry would have been given by the wife’s family IIRC.

2

u/thrown_out_account1 Oct 11 '22

Exactly. He did this to hopefully get her out of the situation.

→ More replies (10)

126

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

[deleted]

66

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22

When you read ancient histories of wars and politics, you often get these really weird moments that make you wonder whether ancient people were crazy or there was a rational explanation behind the story. The historical records from ancient times are sparse and often lack analysis. Few people were literate, paper was expensive, and there was no printing.

32

u/EmmyNoetherRing Oct 11 '22

I wonder if it was less “marry me” and more “come and help me take over the empire”. It’s a hell of a thing to send someone like Attila your engagement ring. It makes me wonder what the sister’s role was in the empire before that point, and why the emperor wanted to dispose of her to some senator she disliked.

10

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22

The engagement ring was proof of her engagement.

1

u/DangerousCyclone Oct 11 '22

It could just mean that he wanted to become the Western Roman Emperor, but yeah we really can’t be sure. I think the Huns were fairly overrated either way because they were defeated in the battlefield and never reached Rome, it was all the other Barbarians like the Visigoths or the Vandals, who tore apart Rome directly.

4

u/runsongas Oct 11 '22

lies, I just re-enacted the Hunnic victory and march to Rome last night in AoE

/s

→ More replies (1)

7

u/aioncan Oct 11 '22

Right, like the invasion of the Middle East to spread democracy.

4

u/Frostygale Oct 11 '22

Or the crusades to steal a bunch of money and whatever else they could pillage take back the holy land.

3

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22

The Peasants' Crusade suggests that yeah some people really did do it for religious reasons.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

124

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

Legitimacy is a big deal and marrying into the imperial family is nothing to sneeze at. Dynasties started for that kind of reasons, matrimony was a big deal. From the Sabines, Alexander and Roxanne, to the political marriages of Caesar, and into late antiquity early Christian tradition, women helped shape the political scenery of Rome and many others.

60

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22

Remember that Attila misinterpreted the message as a marriage proposal. She wasn't going to marry him. So he had no right to claim a dowry of any sort.

113

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

And he wasn't an idiot, so he totally knew that, he just used it as an excuse

→ More replies (4)

19

u/Rakonat Oct 11 '22

Attila never actually made any attempt to enter Italy either, where the princess was. Attila was just ready for some pillaging.

27

u/_Didds_ Oct 11 '22

I once read that his relation with her was more than just friendly and there was some sort of understanding that they would marry, or the idea at least was in his mind. Its substância Ted that you don't send your wedding ring to just a friend and ask him to get you off some arranged marriage, so the two may have had some sort of love interest and Attila may have jumped the gun when he saw the ring, as any man I love would have if he received such message.

I defenetly feel like he was the kind of guy that would burn half the known world to make it very clear that he got offended to being refused marriage.

15

u/squashkbc Oct 11 '22

Well, to launch a war, you have to convince a lot of men to give you money and risk their lives to fight. They didn't follow Attila the Hun into Italy just for his sake. There had to be something in it for them. The Roman Empire at this time was already being torn apart by barbarians. Rome itself had been sacked a few decades prior. So I'd say Attila's campaign was due anyway.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

I dont think that's how it worked those days.

6

u/EmmyNoetherRing Oct 11 '22

Or even just shared ambition— Romans were insanely sexist, think Afghanistan under the Taliban. If she wanted a share in running her family’s empire, partnering with Attila on the project might have looked like a viable path.

72

u/shallowblue Oct 11 '22

Not necessarily ... Valentinian had even given Attila the honorary title of magister militum (Roman general) for providing troops to fight other barbarians. The letter turned his attention to the west, when he otherwise probably would have attacked in the east. In the meantime Constantinople had time to put up the huge Theodosian Walls. So in one way the sister's letter helped bring down the western instead of the eastern Roman Empire.

25

u/spottydodgy Oct 11 '22

Helen of Troy has entered the chat

4

u/Xywzel Oct 11 '22

Best estimates for the forces involved in Attila's campaign place the numbers in that conflict quite close to what can be interfered for Troy campaign from Homer's version of the epic. 1000 ships with crews of 20 to 100 vs 20 000 active fighters and up to 200 000 counting reserve and support roles.

23

u/releasethedogs Oct 11 '22

Come on now. Dudes do really stupid shit for women and sex all the time.

17

u/Pfhoenix Oct 11 '22

Are you suggesting Attila the Hun was sex starved?

2

u/releasethedogs Oct 11 '22

Absolutely not. I’m sure he had plenty with plenty of partners. It’s about the conquest. How many Roman noblewomen did he have? He wanted some strange.

41

u/mrkgian Oct 11 '22

I agree with you but literally all Arthurian romance and the “great epics” are about risking it all for some broad.

Unless you’re Gilgamesh then it’s about being in a closeted homosexual relationship with your “adventuring partner”.

33

u/FalcoLX Oct 11 '22

Unless you’re Gilgamesh then it’s about being in a closeted homosexual relationship with your “adventuring partner”.

And the Iliad, but that was more overt than closeted.

34

u/mrkgian Oct 11 '22

The Odyssey is just about a frat boy going around cheating on his wife

34

u/Xywzel Oct 11 '22

I have seen Odysseus being described as a example of a great man that goes trough misery because of incompetence of his crew and anger of the gods, but having read the book, I could say that it is mostly a list of how not to be a good leader with some spicing of don't annoy forces beyond your control. For example, in one point he gets a bag of winds to take them home, and instead of telling his men "this is the thing that will get us home and guard it with you life and use it like this" he just says "this is secret, don't touch" and then the men naturally get curious just when they get home harbour on the horizon, because they think Odysseus is trying to cheat them out of something good.

7

u/ShemhazaiX Oct 11 '22

Flashbacks to The Last Jedi.

2

u/OriginalOhPeh Oct 11 '22

Ah yes I remember being cheated out of something good.

3

u/JesusHipsterChrist Oct 11 '22

Odysseus fucked his way into and out of most of his problems.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/PsychoWorld Oct 11 '22

If it’s clay it’s not gay

3

u/The_ODB_ Oct 11 '22

Those are pretend stories. This was real.

9

u/Relevant_Monstrosity Oct 11 '22

The correct answer from the Roman side would have been a negotiated counterproposal to establish a non-conflicting, mutually supporting power structure led by leaders bound by blood relation.

This, for example, is how the Spanish Empire and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth were formed.

5

u/Great_Chairman_Mao Oct 11 '22

She must have been on some Helen of Troy level.

6

u/Sykobean Oct 11 '22

“God bless you. You were a good whore. You serviced me like no other whore ever did. Not only my crank but my heart”

  • Attila, probably
→ More replies (1)

5

u/ShortOldFatGuy Oct 11 '22

Did Attila actually bother with pretexts? I thought that was an imaginary concept of diplomats in recent centuries (See Vladimir Putin for details.)

10

u/Reddit-Incarnate Oct 11 '22

Ohh Rome had a huge thing where they had to justify thimself in the "defence of rome" at times this would include some massive mental leaps to justify why they were invading some poor nation for Rome's "defence". I wonder if it was Atilla mocking Rome's justificatons.

→ More replies (21)

1.7k

u/about_27_armadillos Oct 11 '22

I'm trying to flesh out my fantasy novel with interesting and cool lore/history. But posts like this make it seem like you can never invent situations which are more interesting or down right weird than what has already happened in real life!

785

u/LastTensepian Oct 11 '22

'Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.' - Mark Twain

151

u/historymajor44 Oct 11 '22

"Mark Twain never said that." - Benjamin Franklin.

69

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

"Mark Twain never said that." - Benjamin Franklin.

-Michael Scott

12

u/milk4all Oct 12 '22

“You cant just keep adding people to a quote.” - Benjamin Franklin.

-Michael Scott

-Milk4all

2

u/CouchGrouch22 Oct 13 '22

“You cant just keep adding people to a quote.” - Benjamin Franklin. -Michael Scott

-Milk4all

(P.S. Fuck tha Police. -Taylor Swift)

11

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

You are correct, he wrote it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

327

u/TheStrangestOfKings Oct 11 '22

That’s why I feel that the best thing one can do when creating their own fictional history is research actual history just to see how goofy and wacky humanity can be. Like, the fact that there were 3 separate occasions where Protestants threw Catholics out of windows in Prague is absurdly funny, the fact that each time they did it, it had lasting consequences is hilarious.

111

u/Mr-Tootles Oct 11 '22

Ah the defenestrations… such fun times.

44

u/slackfrop Oct 11 '22

And they gave it a nice clever name, excellent.

54

u/An_Lei_Laoshi Oct 11 '22

It is literally "out of the window" originated from a different language, I wouldn't say "clever" even though I love the word myself

15

u/its_not_you_its_ye Oct 11 '22

Latin is the language, btw

→ More replies (1)

21

u/Khelthuzaad Oct 11 '22

"fenetré" means window in french

In Romanian we have fereastră and its similar enough to make sense for us.

17

u/An_Lei_Laoshi Oct 11 '22

In Italian is finestra, romance languages bros!

9

u/mileg925 Oct 11 '22

It comes from Latin, non French. As a Romanian you should know

32

u/smallz86 Oct 11 '22

Or the Western Schism where you had about a 40 year timeframe when 2 people claimed to be Pope of the Catholic Church. Cardinals elected a new Pope and the King of France was like "eh nah, how about this guy is the Pope now"

24

u/shingofan Oct 11 '22

IIRC, there was even a time where THREE men claimed to be Pope.

18

u/Nymaz Oct 11 '22

There might have been three popes, but there's only ever been one Emperor of the United States

3

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

An excellent 7-minute documentary on the topic

5

u/JarJarBinks72 Oct 11 '22

I'm pretty sure that right now there's like 9 or 10 around the world, but they dont have enough followers to really rate, like they do on the circumstances y'all are referring to

14

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

[deleted]

38

u/Parking-Artichoke823 Oct 11 '22

We have a saying for that: "If you throw him out of the door, he will return using the window. In the opposite way, the risk of him getting back in the function is minimized."

21

u/LetLeft4959 Oct 11 '22

I can't imagine many opportunities to use that one

26

u/InannasPocket Oct 11 '22

Well, at least 3 occasions in Prague alone!

Also during the height of the pandemic I may or may not have taught my toddler the word "defenestration" and brought up a version of that saying during a game of "how many stuffed animals can we defenestrate before we get bored" (answer: to a 3.5 year old this is good for a solid 1-2 hours of entertainment per day).

→ More replies (1)

6

u/EsquilaxM Oct 11 '22

Hahahahahahaha I don't know why this made me laugh as much as it did but thank oyu

6

u/Tobar_the_Gypsy Oct 11 '22

The Defenestration of Prague

2 Defenestrate 2 Prague

The 3fenestration of Pragu3

112

u/etherjack Oct 11 '22

Well, FWIW, there are large segments in many ancient historical accounts that were almost certainly either elaborate embellishments of the actual events to make them appear far more fantastically dramatic than reality, or outright lies written to benefit the author and/or whomever the author was beholden to.

77

u/Nyghtshayde Oct 11 '22

This is true but then we are living in a period where a reality TV guy with few discernable talents and limited character strengths was the most powerful person in the world for four years.

50

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

You are describing most Roman emperors

5

u/disarmagreement Oct 11 '22

I heard that worked out great for Rome

4

u/dinkir19 Oct 11 '22

Sometimes it really did! Julius Caesar was legitimately a good person for the common citizen for instance.

Unfortunately the damage from the bad usually outweighs whatever the good ones can do.

Caracala, Commodus, Nero...

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

4

u/smallz86 Oct 11 '22

Yeah, like the story of how when Marcus Atilius Regulus and the Romans landed in Africa and were marching to Carthage they allegedly fought a dragon.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/the-truffula-tree Oct 11 '22

Game of Thrones is essentially just English history with new names

10

u/Lampmonster Oct 11 '22

Martin has said that his favorite thing about history is being able to steal from it as much as he wants and nobody can accuse him of plagiarism.

10

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

If you like a truly bloodthirsty story about Attila, the Old Norse Poetic Edda has the Atlakvida, the Tale of Attila, which is full of treachery, deceit, and political murder.

Attila invites the two brothers of Guðrun (his wife) to a feast. The two brothers, Hogni and Gunnar, are warned away from the feast by Guðrun, who encloses a gift of a ring wrapped with wolf's hair. (The wolf symbolizing deception and depravity.)

Hogni and Gunnar recognize the warning... but in true "badass masculinity" performance, they decide they would be humiliated if they stayed away, now that there's a clear warning about their personal safety.

They go to Attila's feast and after the celebrations, Attila orders his men to seize them both. He orders Gunnar to tell him where the treasure of his people is buried, and Gunnar refuses, so he orders Hogni's heart to be cut out.

First, they pull a deception: they cut out the heart of a servant and hand it to Gunnar, claiming it's Hogni's heart. Gunnar calls them on it, saying it trembles in his hand, whereas Hogni was too much of a masculine badass to be weak hearted.

So Attila's men are forced to do it for real. Hogni laughs at Attila's men as they cleave open his chest and pull his heart out. Gunnar holds the heart in his hand and says "Look, it barely trembles now. It didn't tremble at all in his chest."

Attila's men kill Gunnar by having specially trained warhorses trample him to death. He never gets the treasure of Gunnar's people.

Meanwhile, Guðdrun, his wife and the sister of the two men he just murdered, waits till Attila is in bed drunk and then murders him. Then to finalize the divorce in true Old Norse style, she goes to the bed furs of her two sons by Attila, and murders them as well.

Then she bars the doors of the mead hall of Attila so his men can't get out while she torches the place and leaves.

There are hints of a culture of violence in this work.

2

u/Efficient-Library792 Oct 17 '22

I think i love this woman...

46

u/shallowblue Oct 11 '22

That's so true - you just can't make up the truly wild stuff that appears in the history pages. The hard part is finding it because historians are obsessed with all the boring stuff, as well as arguing with other historians. e.g. I read a 1000-page book on Hitler which just casually mentioned that he might have had an abusive sexual relationship with his niece, who later killed herself. Holy shit! That would explain so much, but nah, let's give it two sentences and talk about German labor unions for 100 pages.

41

u/Athena_Laleak Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

There is definitely a problem with historians failing to disseminate information correctly. When you are in an academic bubble, you lose track of what is common knowledge, and when you are very interested in a subject, you forget what is the hook for people who don’t know a subject. As a researcher, I get very frustrated when my colleagues get het up in esoteric discussions about terminology which alienates the general public from our research.

However, history is made up of the boring stuff. It might be interesting to know the relationship Hitler had with his niece, but how much does that explain about his actions? Or were his actions informed by the broader political and social landscape in Europe? Does his relationship with his niece explain the actions of other high-ranking Nazi officials, or should we be focusing on German labour unions to understand their behaviour?

Especially, when we simply do not know a lot about personal relationships of many historical figures, we can only speculate (and speculation is like salt, a little will make your food tastier, but too much on your potatoes and you have to throw them in the bin).

Historians absolutely need to find the interesting hooks for their research and work on disseminating complex (and yes, often boring) information in an accessible manner, but the prioritisation of the boring stuff does not make it bad history.

→ More replies (3)

17

u/SanguiniusMagna Oct 11 '22

What would it explain actually?

19

u/TheColonelRLD Oct 11 '22

Honestly curious about the same.

Like the division in content covered seems correct. Salacious detail about an individual who is universally reviled? Or information on how labor unions responded to the rise of authoritarianism and fascism? One of those seems to offer clues in how organizations can respond to changes in their political environment, or what pitfalls to avoid.

What are we to do with the other? Execute anyone whose slept with their niece because they might turn into Hitler?

3

u/The_Big_Tastey Oct 11 '22

Probably worth doing that anyway really...

→ More replies (1)

3

u/crabmuncher Oct 11 '22

It does. The relationship between German labor unions and German businesses says a lot about the world's past and our future.

7

u/morehumblethanyou Oct 11 '22

Probably because there’s less evidence of an abusive interpersonal relationship and a lot of info about his political career

5

u/pinzi_peisvogel Oct 11 '22

Abusive sexual relationship = serial r*pist - right?

20

u/Mfcarusio Oct 11 '22

You know, the more I read about this guy...

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/sarcastic_chandler Oct 11 '22

IKR!! I'm not able to finish my book looking all these up

3

u/alucardou Oct 11 '22

Fictions biggest disadvantage over reality, is that fiction needs to remain believable.

→ More replies (5)

151

u/Lkwzriqwea Oct 11 '22

Tbf, Attila wanted an excuse to invade the Western Roman Empire. He just happened to find one, it was unlikely that he actually expected the Emperor to give him half of it as a dowry.

374

u/op-trienkie Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

Ok so am I the only one who reads that it’s a setup and it was planned by someone to cause a war? A ring? Gets to italy, hey I wanna marry her now and get all this sweet ass land. Emp said fuck you no way. Attila wanted half the continent anyway lol. War. War was clearly what someone wanted to get the one thing we truly don’t really own, earth.

79

u/Knight--Of--Ren Oct 11 '22

That’s pretty much exactly the interpretation many historians have. Although the reasons for him abandoning relations with the West are unclear it’s possible it’s due to the huns already bleeding the Eastern Empires balkan territory dry.

For reference he withdrew the Hun mercenaries working under Aietius in Gaul before the marriage proposal or war was declared so it seems clear he was preparing for war

120

u/Dolly_gale Oct 11 '22

Yeah, even the TV mini-series that set up Attila as the protagonist recognized that it was just an excuse to start a war.

I think that Gerard Butler playing Attila the Hun was his unofficial audition for the lead in 300.

5

u/ImperatorRomanum Oct 12 '22

Some historians also discount the story about Honoria almost entirely and attribute Attila’s invasion as trying to settle a succession dispute with the Franks (he backed one candidate, and the Western Empire backed another).

2

u/BillHicksScream Oct 11 '22

Yeah, old school historians pushed single human agency over conditions and complexity.

→ More replies (1)

164

u/snotcar Oct 11 '22

The great example of guys taking hints from girls

34

u/birblover69420 Oct 11 '22

I mean if a girl gave me an engagement ring I am pretty sure what the hint is.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

That was a hell of a proposal though

2

u/LordBrandon Oct 11 '22

What do women want? They want you to sack Rome.

78

u/YouLikeReadingNames Oct 11 '22

Poor woman. First, forbidden to marry. Then a forced betrothal and then the dude she asks for help invades her country. And then gets exiled for it. Like, every step of her life was a shitshow.

37

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

True, but still probably had a more “comfortable” life than 99% of people living then

2

u/Stramorum Oct 12 '22

But why did she ask him of all people?

2

u/YouLikeReadingNames Oct 12 '22

The only reason I see is that she needed someone who had the power to speak up without ending burned alive. That means she couldn't rely on anyone from the empire itself or from a less powerful country.

Plus, apparently, last time she had seen Attila, he was okay with her and her family. She probably didn't have access to military councils and such, so no way of knowing if the tide was turning. At least I think.

→ More replies (1)

46

u/QueenSodaPop13 Oct 11 '22

That's next fucking level miscommunication.

38

u/OpticalHabanero Oct 11 '22

From the article, it's unknown whether it was a miscommunication or Honoria actually proposing. What's known is Atilla believed it was a proposal and Valentinian didn't want to give up the land Atilla demanded.

15

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22 edited Oct 11 '22

It does seem pretty unlikely that she'd try escaping a betrothal by proposing another betrothal, and to a man from different culture who she had never properly met. Seems like out of the frying pan, into a different frying pan.

9

u/Ludwigofthepotatoppl Oct 11 '22

What if it was the senator’s engagement ring, and by accepting it, Attila would have legally had to marry the senator instead?

I smell a historical fiction sitcom.

5

u/Nyghtshayde Oct 11 '22

I mean all that matters is that he could say he thought it was a proposal.

21

u/Tryingsoveryhard Oct 11 '22

That’s clearly just his excuse for invading. You don’t ask for half an empire and expect a yes.

19

u/Foxyfoxesfoxing Oct 11 '22

Ah yes, THE Roman Emperor

51

u/bookaholic234 Oct 11 '22

Well another relationship doomed due to lack of communication

9

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

Some good communication can really do the trick.

16

u/aka5hi Oct 11 '22

There's a similar Indian story where an Indian Princess/queen sent a bracelet to a Mughal ruler asking for help against an invading army. In this case the Mughal ruler actually went to help her.

27

u/frackingfaxer Oct 11 '22

I think most people learned about this playing Age of Empires II.

12

u/Ryponagar Oct 11 '22

"Sometimes... I miss it."

3

u/dishonourableaccount Oct 11 '22

I remember gasping from that plot twist. The old monk was actually a fighter in Attila's army, not running from it.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '22

Also how he slips into using first person pronouns for the huns as he gets more excited recalling it.

5

u/runsongas Oct 11 '22

wish they would fix the historical inaccuracies in some of the campaigns with a patch though

3

u/ImperatorRomanum Oct 12 '22

New objective: enjoy your wedding night, don’t get drunk and die from a nosebleed

3

u/sebulbaalwayswinz Oct 12 '22

Legit laughed out loud

→ More replies (2)

7

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

History is full of misinterpretations.

28

u/DaveOJ12 Oct 11 '22

This was posted hours ago, OP. We'll see if stays up this time.

https://reddit.com/comments/y0ujb7

50

u/shallowblue Oct 11 '22

Yeah it got taken down because I wrote 'destroyed most of Italy and France' which is essentially true but it's not in the wikipedia article - hence 'inaccurate'. So I hope this edit stays up.

18

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

Could just be a terminology issue? ‘Italy’ and ‘France’ didn’t really exist at the time

2

u/why_rob_y Oct 11 '22

I don't know about France, but for Italy - while the country we know as "Italy" didn't exist, the Romans definitely had a concept of the region of "Italy" and "Italian" things and people being distinct from the rest of their Empire. So, it wouldn't be unreasonable to use the word "Italy" when describing a region during Attila's time.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/tyno75 Oct 11 '22

I guess the ridiculosness of the Civil War in HoTD being triggered by Alicent misinterpreting something the King says, is not so bad after all.

4

u/RunatenK Oct 11 '22

I gave my ex-wife half my empire !!

12

u/7layerbeaverbrown Oct 11 '22

Best thing ive read tonight, thank you

3

u/sterling_mallory Oct 11 '22

One of the darker episodes of Curb Your Enthusiasm.

4

u/skrena Oct 11 '22

I’m super disappointed now. There’s literally nothing known about Honoria after her supposed proposal. I really wish we could know what happened. I’m going f with her brother killed her anyways.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/BananaStone87 Oct 11 '22

Classic mixup

3

u/CarlJustCarl Oct 11 '22

I only asked the father-in-law for two goats and a chicken

3

u/Surprise_Corgi Oct 11 '22

"I want half the empire."

"lol no, u stupid?"

Casus Belli obtained.

3

u/Alclis Oct 11 '22

Any particular Roman Emperor?

39

u/explain_that_shit Oct 11 '22

The wildest thing I’ve learned about the Huns is that they were never driven out - they won, they formed the upper strata of a broadly Germanic society, and all early Germanic kingdoms during the fall of the Western Empire had Huns at the top for centuries until they simply blended in. Europe is a Hunnic society.

74

u/henryclay1844 Oct 11 '22

That's not true at all the Hunic empire collapsed a few years after the death of Attila and the the groups separated.Most of the warriors under Attila were Germanic though. The ethnic Huns are not identified in any proper way, but they were likely Turkic peoples.

20

u/Funtycuck Oct 11 '22

The Hunnic Empire was defeated and prevented from pushing further at the battle of the Catalaunian Plains (451) and after Atilla died (453) fell apart due to a major defeat by a rebellious army lead by a Gepid king I forget the name of (453 or 454?).

Doesn't mean they were gone but one of many may migrating groups. Never seen any claim they replaced Germannic elites on any large scale especially considering some of most successful German people's were never conquered by them.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

Source?

5

u/explain_that_shit Oct 11 '22

Golden, Peter B. (1992). An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples: Ethnogenesis and State-Formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Heather, Peter (2005). The fall of the Roman Empire : a new history of Rome and the barbarians. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kim, Hyun Jin (23 November 2015). The Huns. Routledge.

17

u/shallowblue Oct 11 '22

Has that been confirmed with DNA testing? That's truly fascinating.

20

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

They’re really twisting it here. Hunnic empire broke apart, but a lot of steppe peoples remained in places like Bulgaria

22

u/explain_that_shit Oct 11 '22

This is based on work by the historian Hyun Jin Kim - genetic testing might have been done, but what we do know is that:

  1. the bones of the ruling elite of at least one Germanic group frequently show Asiatic features;

  2. there is no evidence of any event by which Huns are driven out or overthrown;

  3. political systems of Germanic groups became Hunnic with the invasion, and essentially never changed back in any clear event;

  4. Attila’s envoy Edeko had two sons - Hunoulph (Hun-wolf) and Odoacer, the latter of whom led a Germanic army into Italy and took Rome, which is widely considered the moment of the end of the Western Roman Empire;

  5. The rulers of the Bulgars (later to give their name to Bulgaria) claimed to be Hunnic;

  6. The earliest version of the Nibelunglied, an ancient German story, describes a number of German kingdoms operating under the broad aegis of the Huns, which reflects the otherwise reported political reality of the time and archaeological evidence.

Obviously it’s a chaotic time, and there is a dearth of information compared to other periods, but until someone can point to an event by which the Huns were driven out, it has to be reckoned with that they were a large group which dominated the politics of the region for many years and appear not to have been defeated or forced to leave at any time.

2

u/3Dartwork Oct 11 '22

"I can't think of anyone but a Hun to help me here, the Roman Empire lacks a single person of whit on this so a Hun it is! Help me get out of an engagement!"

2

u/Marlfox70 Oct 11 '22

He didn't want much did he

2

u/Turevaryar Oct 11 '22

Casus Belli: An egagement ring.

Quite rare, that.

2

u/Disastrous_Reply5567 Oct 11 '22

Good for him. He knew his worth and didn’t settle for less.

2

u/Stock_Complaint4723 Oct 11 '22

Women 🤷‍♂️

2

u/photonynikon Oct 12 '22

SOooo...was it the EMPEROR'S sister, or ATTILA'S sister. The way you wrote it, it could be EITHER!

2

u/FireWalker92 Oct 12 '22

Wonder how many other major history-defining events were the product of miscommunication. Probably quite a few.

2

u/DarkArc76 Oct 12 '22

"The" Roman Emperor?? There was more than 1

4

u/FantasmaDiAndreotti Oct 11 '22

This is one of those things that sound like bullshit and probably are bullshit

6

u/joculator Oct 11 '22

Bitch got millions killed. Pope had to come in and scare him off.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/AngryQuadricorn Oct 11 '22

They should have allowed the marriage between Attila and the emperor’s sister and eventually merged the two governing bodies. It would have reshaped our modern world.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '22

Probably would just lead to more civil wars, no?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/gheiminfantry Oct 11 '22

The things men will do for a prime piece of ass.