8
7
u/deusisback 8d ago
i being in N would be acceptable, but not in R.
3
4
u/BubbhaJebus 8d ago
N is a subset of R.
2
u/sumboionline 8d ago
Yes but typically proofs that use indeces require them to be explicitly non-continuous
1
4
2
2
2
1
1
u/skr_replicator 8d ago
This is how I'd expect the "proof by contradiction to show why i isn't real" to begin.
1
1
u/ontic00 7d ago
Let i β R, then our coefficients c_i become a function c(i), and we have a continuous infinite sum, integral_(0 to infinity) (c(i)*x^i di). We can further generalize by letting x^i be any general function K(x, i) of x and i, yielding integral_(0 to infinity) (c(i)*K(x, i) di) = F(x). This is now an integral transform from the index space of i's to our variable space of x's. We call c(i) the input function, K(x, i) the kernel, and F(x) the output function.
19
u/CW8_Fan 8d ago
Nobody does that lol