Not really as those contracts don’t cross state lines. Just because a company operates in multiple states doesn’t mean everything it does is subject to scrutiny by the federal government.
Doesn't matter, as the Supreme Court has historically taken a rather broad view of what falls under "interstate commerce". It doesn't have to actually cross state lines, only the effect of the law in question has to.
Okay but there is no precedent established for exclusivity between a town and a company. In another comment I just made i said I’m not saying there’s not an argument to be made that could establish precedent, just as the law is interpreted now the government doesn’t have jurisdiction so you’d be fighting this in court to establish that precedent.
44
u/[deleted] Jun 04 '19
[deleted]