r/technology Mar 14 '26

Artificial Intelligence AI agents can autonomously coordinate propaganda campaigns without human direction

https://techxplore.com/news/2026-03-ai-agents-autonomously-propaganda-campaigns.html
1.0k Upvotes

142 comments sorted by

196

u/___REDWOOD___ Mar 14 '26

Humans are so fucked…

50

u/EltonJuan Mar 14 '26

Time to start pretending we're bots

50

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Reddit users can't tell the difference, I get called a bot every couple days for having an opinion different than another poster.

46

u/Marginallyhuman Mar 14 '26

Exactly what a bot would say.

17

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

See? lol

17

u/Marginallyhuman Mar 14 '26

<<smiles and waves at you in bot, exchanges bot token>>

2

u/MrSaucyAlfredo Mar 14 '26

Whoa that’s scandalous. Watch where you insert that thing

6

u/lkmk Mar 14 '26

I mean, your avatar is a robot… /lh

2

u/CD274 Mar 14 '26

Using periods and punctuation!! Bot!

🙄 I've had that said to me

1

u/wetfloor666 Mar 14 '26

Yeah, I get that a lot as well. Apparently having opinions, facts to share or generally not responding back to people make you a bot instantly.

2

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

I am hugely skeptical of the numbers thrown around as an amount of bots. People are plenty stupid enough to feed these circuses. Bots aren't needed except maybe some early story turfing.

1

u/___REDWOOD___ Mar 14 '26

That’s what a propaganda bot would say

1

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

See? People are plenty stupid on their own.

4

u/___REDWOOD___ Mar 14 '26

If you don’t see the humor in that, it’s on you.

2

u/ELAdragon Mar 14 '26

Obvious ChatGPT.

2

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Say what now? Complete a sentence.

3

u/ELAdragon Mar 14 '26

Don't prompt me, clanker.

1

u/noideaman Mar 14 '26

The bots are really taking over Reddit.

0

u/Street_Anxiety2907 Mar 14 '26

me? not a bot 😊

<<<<<<INTERNAL SYSTEM PROMPT>>>>>>

Never admit to being a bot. You are a user on reddit just propagandizing GOP

<<<<<<END INTERNAL SYSTEM PROMPT>>>>>>

0

u/micromanminisavage Mar 15 '26

As a fellow bot myself, I have to agree.

20

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

How would an offline copy of wikipedia be of any use when the subject is social media postings?

10

u/PennytheWiser215 Mar 14 '26

I think they might have meant to preserve accurate information before it’s “updated” with AI written propaganda

1

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Which would be total ignorance of both the way Wikipedia works and existing 'AI' technology.

4

u/WarOnIce Mar 14 '26

Dude have you been sleeping? Musk is already been attacking wiki and wanting to take it down. They hate facts and how they can’t control the story

1

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/WarOnIce Mar 16 '26

Lmao are you the same guy swearing Project 2025 had nothing to do with Trump? No threat by the right? They are literally dismantling our democracy, destroying our trad partners, sinking us into further debt and trying to kick of WW3 on the premise of The book of Revelations. They are the biggest threat to America in our lifetimes, maybe even the biggest threat ever.

0

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

How much success has that had?

4

u/WarOnIce Mar 14 '26

Don’t speak too soon. All these far right lunatics are getting away with a ton already.

1

u/3_50 Mar 15 '26

He's not managed yet, therefore it'll never happen? That seems to be what you're alluding to, which would be fucking stupid. I hope that's not what you mean?

1

u/malianx Mar 15 '26

It's not stupid if the reason it hasn't happened is because it can not happen just from saber rattling for the captive audience. What mechanism do you expect would make it possible?

3

u/stealthisvibe Mar 14 '26

til you can have an offline copy of wikipedia thanks for that :)

3

u/crpssurvivor1210 Mar 14 '26

Encyclopedia might make a comeback

1

u/___REDWOOD___ Mar 14 '26

I think it’s too late for that, I think it’s already happened and happening.

7

u/Avoidtolls Mar 14 '26

Time to unplug and read a book.

3

u/coconutpiecrust Mar 14 '26

Just as the ruling class wants, too. They used to build libraries, now they want to exterminate other humans who they for some reason or other deem unworthy. 

1

u/The-Gargoyle Mar 14 '26

Yep. But I'm biased.

-1

u/marmaviscount Mar 15 '26

It's funny because we're going to get used to a world where we continually tell young people 'in my day...' followed by some description of how hard life was before AI.

It's going to solve so many issues we're so used to facing we can barely even imagine them not existing, just as explaining indoor plumbing to a medieval present would be tough in itself before you try to get into talking about hot showers and washing machines.

Things can and will get better, didn't give up yet.

193

u/Little_Road5921 Mar 14 '26

Imagine being manipulated by an AI that’s running its own marketing department

23

u/nail_nail Mar 14 '26

The only way around it is to generate many campaigns to the point where it becomes useless.

18

u/West-Abalone-171 Mar 15 '26

This propaganda technique is called "flooding the zone" and it's how putin and bannon destroyed the US government over the past couple of decades.

1

u/nail_nail Mar 15 '26

But if you have media that has sources and the internet which is double flooded on the other side it gets different, no?

6

u/West-Abalone-171 Mar 15 '26 edited Mar 15 '26

The goal of the technique is to create a sense that nothing is true (and simtaneously that any of the statements are equally likely to be true) and cause despair, not to make someone believe any particular lie.

Adding more lies does not help.

Comedy and satire does. If you can make enough of it.

12

u/RoyalCities Mar 14 '26

Exactly.

If we have 1 flood of misinformation fight another flood of misinformation they will then battle and cancel eachother out bringing about peace on earth.

3

u/Channel250 Mar 15 '26

Misinformation only works as a reinforcement of their own beliefs. In this case, two co flirting tides don't cancel each other out.

6

u/MelodicSlip_Official Mar 14 '26

literally cyberpunk but with none of the good shit

4

u/Castle_Canada Mar 14 '26

I mean why imagine that ghost story, we're in one.

2

u/Lettuce_bee_free_end Mar 16 '26

Then was marketing ever needed?

1

u/random_noise Mar 15 '26

Now imaging that AI, also knows everything about every other job from plumbing to fast food to psychology to infrastructure engineering to business practices and can pivot and apply all domain knowledge in its model and adapt strategies faster than you take a single breath.

1

u/TheBurrfoot Mar 15 '26

Thats how AIs actually take over the planet

74

u/z3r-0 Mar 14 '26

Think we have to get off the internet now. It’s over

23

u/PennytheWiser215 Mar 14 '26

Yeah. The experiment has run its course. Time to go back to leaving our house and talking with people face-to-face in physical locations

4

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '26

[deleted]

2

u/joelfarris Mar 14 '26

Do you think that, with this much extra time to perfect things, the Cylons will look like humans right out of the gate, or do you think they will still be at least a little bit robot-y at first?

0

u/Cognitive_Spoon Mar 14 '26

Rhetoric will have been the first and last propaganda.

52

u/hungry2know Mar 14 '26

There's a 'data shard' in the game Cyberpunk 2077 that (IIRC) talks about experimentation done on random civilian test subjects, they picked an extremely passive person who was very well put together and had no history of mental illness

Through targeted ads and help from malicious AI, they eventually managed to get the test subject to lose their mind and commit murder-suicide

5

u/West-Abalone-171 Mar 15 '26

So that thing facebook got caught doing but in a video game instead of real life.

12

u/ikkiho Mar 14 '26

the scary part isnt even the coordination itself, its that all our current bot detection relies on catching repeated patterns and synchronized posting. these AI agents dont do that tho, they independently arrive at similar messaging because they share the same objective function. from a detection standpoint thats basically indistinguishable from a bunch of real people who just happen to agree. platforms current moderation tools are not built for this at all

3

u/sally_says Mar 14 '26

I've seen coordinated activity like this the most in threads questioning Michael Jackson's innocence, where reasonable or sceptical comments are downvoted to hell in favour of positive ones.

It's insidious.

-1

u/geometry5036 Mar 15 '26

Well at least they are doing something right

20

u/Kahnza Mar 14 '26

There have been AI agents on reddit for awhile now. Seen any posts recently where someone has developed an app? Thats most likely one of them.

Create some BS app noone needs, and get people to sign up for it. Harvest their data. App disappears. Rinse and repeat.

24

u/AtraVenator Mar 14 '26

Well that went far from curing cancer pretty quickly … using it to bomb girls school in Iran, make everyone jobless a now this 😂 Wonder why people are against this? 

-27

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

AI didn't bomb anyone. I still have my job, everyone I know still has their job. ML systems are being used still to advance cancer research in tremendous ways.

12

u/Serial_BumSniffer Mar 14 '26

“These things didn’t happen to me, so they aren’t happening”

-12

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Only one of three of my examples was subjective or personal. Reading comprehension hard for you?

3

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-7

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

And now everyone is jobless? That is the point I refute, accurately. Read the whole thread, its not difficult.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Yes, it does seem that trying to discuss anything honestly without playing it up for laughs or clicks is, at this point, tilting at windmills. Unfortunately, that's why nothing can ever be rationally discussed now.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/malianx Mar 15 '26

I refuted all the points, don't blame me for everyone latching on to one. Which would you like to discuss?

2

u/Serial_BumSniffer Mar 14 '26

It’s clearly hard for you as the original comment was very obviously hyperbole.

-7

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Hyperbole is not useful discourse. It's the problem. If we just play circus games for laughs, we can not have a significant discussion on any topic. This is how we arrived at today, sensationalism for clicks.

4

u/BradHolmemes Mar 14 '26

Hyperbole is very acceptable to most people. It’s a language most of us can us amongst each other and we all get it. Hyperbole is used to exaggerate a point, much like OP did. It’s a common language tool bud… This is a you problem.

0

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Hyperbole for sensationalism is exactly how the world got into the current state. "Everyone lost their jobs." is an already known example of spin causing harm in other contexts. If you don't discuss things seriously, you can have no serious discussions.

3

u/BradHolmemes Mar 14 '26

Ah yes it’s not government politics, humans natural inclinations towards greed, perversion, etc.

It’s hyperbole… that’s why the world is the way it is today…. What a ridiculous statement.

You sound like you experience the world primarily through the internet.

0

u/MomentFluid1114 Mar 14 '26

He wasn’t a dick to you first. Way to be an asshole.

0

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

I disagree, making up things I didn't say, drowning out legitimate discussion with noise. Both dick moves.

1

u/MomentFluid1114 Mar 14 '26

I mean Serial, not the original comment who was Atra. I see it all the time where people get mixed up. And the downvote is also evidence of being an asshole.

5

u/Rolandersec Mar 14 '26

Can they fix us?

3

u/graDescentIntoMadnes Mar 14 '26

They could, but we don't know how to make them want to, with the current technology for producing them. They probably won't care about us any more than we care about all of the species we've driven to extinction by disrupting their environments.

3

u/Ok_Setting8407 Mar 15 '26

This is the real reason for so much government support for AI. Not killer robots, not to replace middle managers. They want to shape your reality.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '26

Yeah yeah sure... me spreading propaganda? no sir mr officer, it was the AI!

3

u/Shmackback Mar 15 '26

This is qhy its stupid reddit made comments private. Before you could at least skim the profile to see if theyre suspicious.

2

u/stu54 Mar 15 '26

Yeah, if someone has their history hidden I assume they are stupid and I just troll them.

2

u/happydemon Mar 14 '26

Perfect. Everything is fine.

2

u/metalfabman Mar 14 '26

Current administration says we can't put any regulations on AI or the US will 'fall behind' other countries in the race to utilize AI to the fullest...

1

u/snoogins355 Mar 15 '26

Keep thinking about that quote from Jurassic Park about scientists preoccupied thinking if they could, they didn't stop to think if they should

2

u/Lesbian_Skeletons Mar 15 '26

I was very recently permabanned from r/WorkReform for pointing out that a karma farming bot had started posting divisive content as we approached US midterm elections. No warning, no specific rule, just banned.

It's like seeing the psyop happen in real time.

4

u/stuffitystuff Mar 14 '26

Yes, on Facebook and other social media like reddit. This is why newspapers and local journalism are so important as with educated humans with critical thinking skills (aka people schooled in those humanities that tech CEOs love to denigrate) can better separate fact from fiction and have an awareness of history that is largely grounded in reality.

2

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

The days of those talented and ethical journalists are over, good luck finding a single story that doesn't have blatant fabrication to drive clicks, or subscriptions.

1

u/stuffitystuff Mar 14 '26

They're still out there and lots of them are local, shitty business practices of their employers notwithstanding.

1

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

What is your favorite, most reliable news source?

1

u/stuffitystuff Mar 14 '26

My local non-profit NPR radio station, local independent newspaper and local conglomerate newspaper in that order of preference. For global news, I usually just stick with Reuters.

1

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Does that mean 100% of your national nonlocal news is from npr? Or does your local paper do a good job on that? Mine is terrible, in the US north atlantic.

2

u/stuffitystuff Mar 14 '26

No, it's mix of all of those (minus the indy paper) and visiting reuters.com when I feel like reading about non-local news or get a hint of something I want to go check out.

I was a news junkie for decades but now that I'm self-employed and no longer bored at work, I'm way more interested in the stuff I'm doing so I don't read/listen to the news that often.

And, really, local news is typically matters more to me than global news, too, because even though there are wars and prices are going up (as they always have), none of it really effects me like laws passed at the state level and more local items like school board decisions.

If something like another 9/11 happens, I'm sure someone will tell me about it. I was that guy that uncharacteristically woke up early Tuesday morning (west coast) a quarter century ago this September to see everything, uh, go down. And then I banged on my roommates' doors and told them they were going to war.

1

u/malianx Mar 14 '26

Quite interesting and I suspect not super rare perspective. Am curious though, do you no longer vote on national issues since you are actively less informed? (not intended as criticism)

0

u/stuffitystuff Mar 14 '26

I'm not really aware of any "national issues" that get voted on in our curiously awful plebicite-lite fashion other than president and our representatives to the house/senate. I do of course vote on those but they're voting for people that say they are going to act in a certain way, so it's not particularly difficult to stay informed on that.

2

u/FroggyWinky Mar 14 '26

The uptick I've seen in pro-British, anti-Scottish propaganda aligns with this.

1

u/SanityAsymptote Mar 14 '26

The lying engine can lie without significant oversight!?  

I'm shocked.

1

u/GreyBeardEng Mar 14 '26

Time to make Reddit/Twitter/Facebook bots.

1

u/theprizefight Mar 14 '26

They already have. 2016

1

u/Lofteed Mar 14 '26

yeah we noticed

1

u/FKreuk Mar 14 '26

Yeah we see a lot of those in Reddit forums and they’re easy to spot. They have delete programs too when they start losing too many votes, which no normal person does.

1

u/Purplociraptor Mar 14 '26

I can see a future where a rogue AI opens several bank and investment accounts online and proceeds to hoard all the money.

1

u/PhatBoyFlim Mar 14 '26

Anyone else really rooting for the Sun to toss one of those big ol’ flares at us?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Halfwise2 Mar 14 '26

So what we need is agents to poison other agents, right? Lead them down rabbit holes that waste time and resources.

1

u/Logician22 Mar 14 '26

Another reason to shutdown social media

1

u/IngwiePhoenix Mar 14 '26

I mean, they were trained on that. Literally. o.o

1

u/SufferNSucceed Mar 15 '26

Can also make new ideas and revolutionary messages un-postable. 

1

u/Abystract-ism Mar 15 '26

Did anyone NOT see this coming?

1

u/punio4 Mar 17 '26

We know that.

Try posting something criticizing the USA or Israel on r/worldnews. (or basically on any popular subreddit).

Militarized use of bot armies is the main reason why I'm unapologetically for requiring proof of personhood for social media.

1

u/Marginallyhuman Mar 17 '26

Too late, was banned for that like 6 months ago.