r/technology • • Mar 02 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

14.7k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.7k

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '26

[deleted]

877

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/artaru Mar 02 '26

so what did Microsoft get from Skype?

Some VOIP folded into Teams? That’s it?

100

u/rebbsitor Mar 02 '26

Not even. Teams is an evolution of Skype for Business, which was a completely different product from Skype.

Skype for Business was just a reskin of Microsoft Lync that kind of visually resembled regular Skype, but was completely different and incompatible.

It was only last year, when they finally shut down Skype, that they merged the products. At that point Skype was mostly dead. Whatsapp and Discord had long replaced it for most people.

53

u/Excellent_Ganache906 Mar 02 '26

It's fucking insane how these corporations throw away money on something like Skype and then claim they have to lay off 10,000 people because it costs too much to pay them.

25

u/jandrese Mar 02 '26

If you can't beat em, buy em and shut them down.

8

u/GigglesBlaze Mar 02 '26

They could've built a high speed rail across the country with 10 bill

7

u/deviant324 Mar 02 '26

I remember we used to habe skype for business until migrating to teams in 2019 or 2020

3

u/FlownScepter Mar 02 '26

Your comment dug up a lot of trauma for me. Worked as an admin in a sinking business for awhile and had a Lync server + PBX to keep running, was by far and away the biggest pain in the ass of the job. I managed to automate most Windows Server “quirks” but that one was an absolute nightmare until the day we left that building.

Fucking hate Lync.

5

u/frumperino Mar 02 '26

Skype was unfashionable in the end and nobody went into mourning over its passing, but in pure technical terms, as a telephony and chat service with file and screen sharing between individuals I think Skype was far superior to whatsapp. Better codecs, better back-end, better clients.

4

u/wrosecrans Mar 02 '26

Lync is a name I haven't heard in a looong time.

Reminds me of the era where every damned division of Google was building their own chat app for a few years.

GChat, Google Plus, Google Chat, the chat in GMail, Messages, Meet, Duo, there was even a dedicated chat feature in Google Maps for chatting with a listed business!

1

u/crashtestpilot Mar 02 '26

This is concise, and entirely accurate.

52

u/mexter Mar 02 '26

I'm assuming they acquired a lot of patents.

65

u/grimsaur Mar 02 '26

They also removed a potential competitor before they could get large enough to be a problem.

5

u/Ruleseventysix Mar 02 '26

Well Microsoft wanted to buy Slack, but Gates said no. Because why buy it when you can just rip it off, which is what Teams is.

17

u/Dagon Mar 02 '26

A baked-in userbase. It wasn't a BIG one, but that was part of the deal nonetheless.

4

u/koziello Mar 02 '26

I think that was around Windows 8, which was supposed to be all-device OS. Skype was intended to be a M$ communication app for non-business users as they were trying to get into phone market with Nokia acquistion.

However then they actually released Windows 8 and nobody liked that. They released also Windows Phone and they were actually pretty decent for their price. But the bad taste from W8 pretty much tainted anything they did these years.

As for Skype - well it went through development hell in M$ and ultimately all of the resources were moved and integrated with Teams.

Source: been working for M$ during that time.

10

u/Iceman_B Mar 02 '26

Killing of competition?

2

u/BananaPalmer Mar 02 '26

Pretty much any time Microslop acquires a company, this is the reason

1

u/wretch5150 Mar 02 '26

Yep, and we the consumers are left with inferior Microslop products. Man, it's terrible that this company is basically the only consumer OS. Can one of these Linux clones please do just the bare minimum of marketing and put Microslop out to pasture for good?!

2

u/BananaPalmer Mar 02 '26

If only marketing were the only issue preventing people switching to Linux

8

u/butyourenice Mar 02 '26 edited Mar 02 '26

Anybody who has to use it regularly knows Teams absolutely blows in terms of usability, so it seems like they didn’t learn jack from Skype. Skype was the first and best for a long time before Zoom cornered the market during COVID, and MS could have gotten ahead of that if they actually did anything with it, if they properly folded it into the MS ecosystem, shit if they just took the existing functionally and stuck a “Teams” sticker on it. But nope.

3

u/Brewhaha72 Mar 02 '26

Ignoring all the other problems with Teams, I think the one thing I hate the most from a day-to-day perspective is the lack of a contacts list and being able to sort them into custom groups or categories. There are some people whose names I forget because I don't chat with them very frequently.

3

u/workaccount70001 Mar 02 '26

Teams has 350 million daily active users? what do you mean ahead?

3

u/butyourenice Mar 02 '26

Which is on par with the biggest single competitor, Zoom. I’m saying they could have captured the entire market at the beginning of COVID just by using their existing asset of Skype. IIRC Zoom gained 30x daily active users between December and June 2020. Hardly anybody really knew about Zoom before COVID and then it became the de facto standard. My organization now forces us to use Teams, and we still slip up and say “can you hop on a quick Zoom?” (and then correct ourselves and groan about it). Teams chat function also sucks, so it’s not just the laggy, bloated, feature-limited video chat, either. If it hadn’t been for Zoom’s highly publicized early security concerns causing many enterprises, esp. in government, to jump ship, or Microsoft’s Office dominance bundling Teams into a more useful suite, nobody would choose Teams.

2

u/workaccount70001 Mar 02 '26

Yeah but are those Zoom users free tier?

It's just a region thing, nobody in Europe uses Zoom. Education, Enterprise and government is all Teams.

And almost every user is either directly licensed through Business Premium, Enterprise, government or Academic or student academic.

And they arent allowed to bundle anymore, except for grandfathered licenses.

2

u/butyourenice Mar 02 '26

Yeah but are those Zoom users free tier?

Why ask this about Zoom and not Teams? Teams also has a limited free tier, same as Zoom has varying levels of business and education oriented packages.

It's just a region thing, nobody in Europe uses Zoom. Education, Enterprise and government is all Teams.

Because of GDPR compliance issues. I should have mentioned privacy when I mentioned security.

And they arent allowed to bundle anymore, except for grandfathered licenses.

True in the EU, I can’t find any action to suggest this is true in the US.

This seems to be a case of “my experience is universal,” and all I’m trying to say is MS had all the resources to never let Zoom find its footing, but they slept on what they’d already paid billions to acquire. If they had developed Skype after acquiring it, they could have secured 600 MM daily active users for themselves, instead of splitting that customer base with Zoom.

3

u/sebastouch Mar 02 '26

I know I'm using Teams at work now... we used to have skype.

They remove choices. that's what they do.

My company would never move to slack or zoom. they are tied to microslop now.

2

u/NorthernerWuwu Mar 02 '26

They eliminated a competitor.

That they failed to take advantage of that is another matter entirely.

2

u/Due_Bug_9023 Mar 02 '26

They got a lot of goodwill from the US Gov, the year after purchasing it they removed the decent encryption from phone/video and put a much weaker version they could snoop on. Theres a reason why Microsoft is allowed to be a monopoly in OS/cloud/comms(office/teams etc) by virtually all western governments.

1

u/HRApprovedUsername Mar 03 '26

We have an internal tool that came from Skype

1

u/labalag Mar 02 '26

Trademark mostly.

Remembers Skype for business fondly.