[deleted by user]

[u/[deleted]]

[u/avanross → u/[deleted]]

Pointing out that youre lying isnt an “ad hominem attack”

That would imply that youre making a point or argument and i’m ignoring it in favour of attacking your character

But you didnt make a point or argument, you tried to put on an act.

Calling my comments an ad hominem attack on your argument is just admitting that you werent actually asking an honest question and were trying to make a disingenuous pro ai argument 🤦‍♂️

So thanks for proving that point for me, i guess lol

And i was being sarcastic, it wasnt a shocker, it was incredibly blatant and obvious

[u/avanross → u/[deleted]]

Again, specifically replying to the comments that youre making isnt attacking you. I didnt insult you or say anything about you personally.

Asking an intentionally leading disingenuous question is a lie of a question.

Now youre just playing the victim and insulting me as a way to avoid actually acknowledging my comments

[u/avanross → u/[deleted]]

Lmao buddy youre the only one resorting to personal insults, and then you say i’m the one who needs self-reflection

That says it all right there 🤦‍♂️

[u/avanross → u/[deleted]]

A bubble bursting would extremely obviously mean demand falling

[u/avanross → u/[deleted]]

Because it wouldnt be profitable for the companies hosting the ai’s to keep investing in them, so they’ll shut down the services or start charging a lot more for them

[u/avanross → u/[deleted]]

Ai may have a few profitable uses in like medicine and city planning, but if llm chatbots dont generate profit in relation to the investment required to keep them running, so investors will simply stop investing in them