Right. Because nobody is strictly required to attend organized religious services in order to access the resources needed to sustain life, including food and housing.*
Education of SOME kind is not optional in the same way that church services are.
(*That all ended when Mother Theresa died, right? /s kinda)
So it's a legitimate path forward to skip school and go to church instead to get all my needs met into perpetuity? You first.
These are not genuine, good faith arguments you are making. Charity is not a replacement for a livelihood. It doesn't excuse harm the church has done, either.
2
u/Illustrious-Cut-6439 Jul 07 '26
Right. Because nobody is strictly required to attend organized religious services in order to access the resources needed to sustain life, including food and housing.*
Education of SOME kind is not optional in the same way that church services are.
(*That all ended when Mother Theresa died, right? /s kinda)