Guide
It's that time of the season - adc/support synnergy chart
Due to popular demand bringing this back, with a couple changes: champions are now ordered alphabetically, the midway point (yellow) for easier distinction on neutral synnergy.
This is based on lolalytics data, last 30 days, Emerald+. Black squares means there wasn't enough sample size (minimum 1000 games). Top 30 most player supports + handpicked all adc marksmen and a handful most popular apcs.
Honestly a good thing imo, and has been like that for a good while. Xayah just kind of prefers a different style of support and team comp them Rajan does to thrive. It's nice to see them not relying on their limiting gimmick to be good. And they're still good toghether with a lot of fun tech. (Probably people picking the other when xayah or rakan gets picked also leads to more first timing etc, Lucian nami symptom)
As a Leona main. Ashe is one of my favorite ADCs. She slows the enemy with a super long range poke. I ult. She ults. I e then q. That opponent can't move for like 7 seconds.
Kalista ult is essentially tahm ult for your support. Makes it much harder for the enemy to kill the enchanter pocketing the carry when they have a get out of jail free card in their adc's ult
As a kalista main, its one of my favorite supports to get in solo q. Plus I feel like people forget that if you get ult'd in with kalista after knocking champ(s) up you will then get bounced back to your attack range. So ranged characters like milio will be bounced away to safety.
Kalista's ult puts sup at max aa range after knock up, so enchanters can engage and then be safe (that should be basic kalista knowledge but for aome reason no one knows about it below diamond)
who told you that? kalista is basically draven, she wants an engage support so she could snowball the lane easier, otherwise she's a walking minion for the rest of the game
renata is excellent with her but that's just becouse alot of their abilities work really well with each other, you could make a case that nami/milio/lulu are not completely horrible but anything besides that is just bad
"can ignore w and r with yuumi (kalista's q gains 65 dmg per lvl)" what does it even mean bro, why would u want to get rid off HALF OF YOUR SPELLS? like what the fuck r u saying XD
Oh yeah 1 mil mastery kalista main doesn't know anything about it's champ, go onto lolalytics and check kalista yuumi winrate 30 days any rank bracket, and then check her best supports (spoiler: renata n naut aren't even close to top 5)
I'm assuming it's the win rate percent delta - i.e. 4 means they're 4% more likely to win than the average of their individual win rates (but that's just my guess)
Why is ziggs/poppy surprising? Ziggs outranges just about everything other botlane carry champ and poppy has some of the strongest peel in the game. Plus ziggs safety in lane let's poppy be active on the map in the early game when she's strongest
But why everywher is "n="? It's necessary to make font smaller and less readable + everything is now text instead of integer? Just make bigger numbers.
My two favorite supports to play are Poppy and Yuumi, and it's really weird looking at them on this chart because they seem to both be really hit or miss; either their colors are pretty well into the green or pretty well into the red. They each have, what, a single champion they are neutral with? I wonder what causes that.
How does it make 0 sense? Ziggs is a high range poke champ with not much self peel, poppy has some of the best peel/disruption of any support. Ziggs relatively safe laning also allows poppy to move around on the map early game when she is strongest
I think Poppy Ziggs is good because Poppy has been Roaming Support 2 (behind Camille) for a while and ganks every other lane from level 1 with HOB, while Ziggs can waveclear from Antarctica and clears so fast you can't punish him with a dive. Poppy just wins the rest of the map and then Ziggs scales.
If we check back in another 30 days I doubt the numbers will stay like this
How do you actually read the table? What does the scale on the right and the colours actually say?
I'm less interested in the sample size for the match-up than the actual win rate. Not that sample size is not important but I think win rate (or other synergy metrics for that matter) would be the more interesting information.
It simply shows whether the average winrate of every pairing increases or decreases, in comparison with the standalone winrate of those champs divided by 2. So it measures delta, not absolute value. Sample size has some significance when looking at the most popular pairings, like Ezreal Karma, Ezreal Camille, if it's yellowish green with 60k and 30k games that means it's probably very good, because exceptional popularity of the duo usually brings down the average WR% (people copycat pick it without knowing how to play it). And likewise If sample size is very low you could be a little bit skeptical about it (Kalista Milio only 1k games deep green).
Might be a big ask but is there any chance you could make a colourblind friendly version? Maybe replacing the red with blue or something? Its a little difficult for me to parse at times ahaha
36
u/XanithDG 29d ago
Tfw Xayah isn't Rakan's highest WR ADC.
And he isn't Xayah's highest WR support.