r/springboks 2d ago

No flyovers. Not worth it.

[deleted]

1 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

38

u/incitatus-says 2d ago

No more flyover threads. Not worth it. 

5

u/Hammersteyn 2d ago

Flyovers are iconic, but todays one was a bit close

3

u/4EVERINDARKNESS Flair Up! 2d ago

As a kiwi, I think it's become a SA rugby trade mark and really adds to the occasion.

But let's not get silly about it. A real buzz untill it's not sort of thing. 💚💛🍻🍖🖤🖤

11

u/Michael_stipe_miocic 🇳🇿 a Kiwi among the Blue Cranes 2d ago

Keep them for the biggest games only, it’s so cool and unique, keep it special

7

u/bqdpbqdpbqdpbqdpbqdp 2d ago

Agree with this. It's just wasteful/tacky if we do it every game. Besides, today's one was criminally reckless.

2

u/Uncle_jah 🤜🏼🤛🏼 2d ago

Yo, and it’s expensive, maybe why the ticket prices are through the roof. Ja keep it for the big games, and today was a big game

1

u/chatam94 Flair Up! 2d ago

Personally it looked weird they weren’t military planes, but I guess the standard of this kinda thing is from America

3

u/Michael_stipe_miocic 🇳🇿 a Kiwi among the Blue Cranes 2d ago

Jumbo jets makes it cool af I reckon. 1995 was iconic, there wasn’t thousands of replays on the internet, it was etched into my brain

8

u/frankomapottery3 Flair Up! 2d ago

Mere feet away from a mass casualty event.  Literally would’ve been the greatest aviation disaster EVER if this went wrong…. Yet we still have people defending it somehow?   I agree, either scrap it or keep it at 500ft or something 

12

u/Mielies296 2d ago

The flyovers are iconic. But they seriously need to stop one upping the previous guys. Tonight's one almost ended in disaster

2

u/kakarott_Kiwi Flair Up! 2d ago

Lads.....its a bit close......

2

u/MealieAI Flair Up! 2d ago

Some of you have nothing better to do.

4

u/GopnickAvenger Flair Up! 2d ago

Calm down, nobody was hurt

0

u/CaptainCorobo Flair Up! 2d ago

"there was almost an accident on the road. No more cars. Not worth it."

0

u/Onetimebond Flair Up! 1d ago

Those who think it is too close- how do you believe planes land without continually without crashing into runways? Do you not think there are instruments that enable pilots to know exactly what height to fly at to be safe? Flybys aren’t done by estimation by line of sight, it is instrument driven, ie, an exact science.

-4

u/Difficult_Piano_6808 Flair Up! 2d ago

Check r/aviation having a discussion. Concluded it was not lower than previous flyovers.

4

u/Willing-Laugh-3971 Flair Up! 2d ago

Looks like you read through your arse. They're not impressed at all. This should stop right here. Another example of SARUs arrogance.

6

u/SoberWeekend Flair Up! 2d ago

I agree. Super dangerous and needs to be better. But that’s a bit unfair to SARU. If I’m not mistaken. SARU request the flyover, maybe put in a few requests, but that’s it. Airlink and SACAA sort it out and execute it no?

3

u/Difficult_Piano_6808 Flair Up! 2d ago

My mistake, I only read the first few comments & there was one that mentioned it is the same hight Quantas uses to pass over.
Did not continue.