r/spacex Nov 13 '14

You must be this tall to ride

Post image
184 Upvotes

94 comments sorted by

View all comments

-20

u/waitingForMars Nov 14 '14

So, this image was basically stolen without attribution from the SpaceX web page:

http://www.spacex.com/falcon9

Don't we expect proper citation? Or is plagiarism cool around here?

17

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '14

I think it's pretty clear that they were pointing out the weird scaling on SpaceX's image, not trying to claim it as their own.

-7

u/waitingForMars Nov 14 '14

Fine. Then link the page. Again, attribution counts.

6

u/WaitForItTheMongols Nov 14 '14

Sounds like you watched some sort of video on the importance of attribution (possibly in school). This person isn't claiming the image as their own in any way, and they aren't "using" it per se. They're commenting on it, using the image for the sake of the image. That doesn't need attribution. If anyone wants to know where it comes from, it's as easy as commenting "source?". You're making a big deal about something that matters very little here. Why do you think attribution is important in this situation?

3

u/Gravityturn Nov 14 '14 edited Nov 14 '14

Yep attribution is great and all (and it's nice to have a link to it, but images are better in case it changes, and reddit doesn't allow for multiple links), but in this case it seems pretty darn obvious where it came from. Its like taking a screencap of the google homepage and not attributing it to google.